on January 15, 2004
Published online before print January 15, 2004, doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000110984.91157.BD
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Submitted on September 4, 2003
From the College of Pharmacy, University of Illinois at Chicago (A.S.P.); Division of Neurology (A.M.N., A.S.), Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry (J.A.J., D.H.F.), Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences (D.H.F.), and Department of Mathematics and Statistics (K.C.C.), University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta; Institute of Health Economics (J.A.J., D.H.F.), Edmonton, Alberta; and Health Utilities Incorporated (D.H.F.), Dundas, Ontario, Canada. * To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: pickard1{at}uic.edu.
Background and Purpose--Proxy informants can provide information on patients who are limited in ability to self-assess health-related quality of life (HRQL) after stroke. One alternative is to exclude assessments of such patients and attenuate generalizability. The purpose of this study was to examine patient-proxy agreement on the domains and summary scores of the EQ-5D and Health Utilities Index Mark 3 (HUI3) after stroke. Methods--An observational longitudinal cohort of 124 patients hospitalized after ischemic stroke and their family caregivers completed the HRQL measures at baseline and were followed up for 6 months. Patient and proxy agreement was assessed by use of weighted Results--At baseline, the more observable domains of HRQL demonstrated greater agreement than the more subjective components. Cross-sectional point estimates of agreement were generally acceptable (ICC >0.70) for the EQ-5D Index and HUI3 summary scores when assessed Conclusions--Results suggest that proxy assessments obtained 6 months after stroke are more reliable than those obtained within 2 to 3 weeks after stroke. Although proxy-assessed change scores for indirect preference-based summary scores of the EQ-5D and HUI3 provided suboptimal agreement with patient assessment, limited systematic bias may support their consideration as alternatives to missing data or statistical imputation. Further research into the validity and reliability of proxy assessments is suggested.
Accepted on October 14, 2003
Agreement Between Patient and Proxy Assessments of Health-Related Quality of Life After Stroke Using the EQ-5D and Health Utilities Index
A. Simon Pickard PhD*;
or the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).
1 month after baseline. Agreement between change scores was generally poor to fair (ICC <0.60), but systematic bias was not observed for the indirect preference-based summary scores between baseline and 6 months.
Key words: observer variation • outcome • quality of life • stroke assessment
This article has been cited by other articles:
 |
|
 |
|
  F. J. Carod-Artal, L. F. Coral, D. S. Trizotto, and C. M. Moreira Self- and Proxy-Report Agreement on the Stroke Impact Scale Stroke, October 1, 2009; 40(10): 3308 - 3314. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 I. Muus, M. Petzold, and K. C. Ringsberg Health-Related Quality of Life After Stroke: Reliability of Proxy Responses Clin Nurs Res, May 1, 2009; 18(2): 103 - 118. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 K. Hilari, S. Owen, and S. J. Farrelly Proxy and self-report agreement on the Stroke and Aphasia Quality of Life Scale-39 J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, October 1, 2007; 78(10): 1072 - 1075. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. S. Williams, T. Bakas, E. Brizendine, L. Plue, W. Tu, H. Hendrie, and K. Kroenke How Valid Are Family Proxy Assessments of Stroke Patients' Health-Related Quality of Life? Stroke, August 1, 2006; 37(8): 2081 - 2085. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. J. Calvert, N. Freemantle, and J. G.F. Cleland The impact of chronic heart failure on health-related quality of life data acquired in the baseline phase of the CARE-HF study Eur J Heart Fail, March 2, 2005; 7(2): 243 - 251. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|