Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Stroke
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Published Online
on June 10, 2004

Stroke. 2004
Published online before print June 10, 2004, doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000132569.33572.75
A more recent version of this article appeared on August 1, 2004
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
35/8/1914    most recent
01.STR.0000132569.33572.75v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Michaelsen, S. M.
Right arrow Articles by Levin, M. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Michaelsen, S. M.
Right arrow Articles by Levin, M. F.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
Medline Plus Health Information
*Stroke
Related Collections
Right arrow Exercise/exercise testing/rehabilitation
Right arrow Rehabilitation, Stroke

Submitted on April 1, 2004
Accepted on April 20, 2004

Short-Term Effects of Practice With Trunk Restraint on Reaching Movements in Patients With Chronic Stroke. A Controlled Trial

Stella M. Michaelsen DEA and Mindy F. Levin PhD*

From the School of Rehabilitation, University of Montreal (S.M.M., M.F.L.) and the Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation (M.F.L.), Rehabilitation Institute of Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: mindy.levin{at}umontreal.ca.

Background and Purpose--In prehension tasks with objects placed within arm’s reach, patients with hemiparesis caused by stroke use excessive trunk movement to compensate for arm motor impairments. Compensatory trunk movements may improve motor function in the short term but may limit arm recovery in the long term. Previous studies showed that restriction of trunk movements during reach-to-grasp movements results in immediate increases in active arm joint ranges and improvement in interjoint coordination. To evaluate the potential of this technique as a therapeutic intervention, we compared the effects of short-term reach-to-grasp training (60-trial training session) with and without physical trunk restraint on arm movement patterns in patients with chronic hemiparesis.

Methods--A total of 28 patients with hemiparesis were assigned to 2 groups: 1 group practiced reach-to-grasp movements during which compensatory movement of the trunk was prevented by a harness (trunk restraint), and the second group practiced the same task while verbally instructed not to move the trunk (control). Kinematics of reaching and grasping an object placed within arm’s length were recorded before, immediately after, and 24 hours after training.

Results--The trunk restraint group used more elbow extension, less anterior trunk displacement, and had better interjoint coordination than the control group after training, and range of motion was maintained 24 hours later in only the trunk restraint group.

Conclusion--Restriction of compensatory trunk movements during practice may lead to greater improvements in reach-to-grasp movements in patients with chronic stroke than practice alone, and longer-term effects of this intervention should be evaluated.


Key words: hemiplegia • rehabilitation • recovery of function




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ptjournalHome page
J. M Wagner, J. A Rhodes, and C. Patten
Reproducibility and Minimal Detectable Change of Three-Dimensional Kinematic Analysis of Reaching Tasks in People With Hemiparesis After Stroke
Physical Therapy, May 1, 2008; 88(5): 652 - 663.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Neurorehabil Neural RepairHome page
M.C. Cirstea and M.F. Levin
Improvement of Arm Movement Patterns and Endpoint Control Depends on Type of Feedback During Practice in Stroke Survivors
Neurorehabil Neural Repair, October 1, 2007; 21(5): 398 - 411.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
S. M. Michaelsen, R. Dannenbaum, and M. F. Levin
Task-Specific Training With Trunk Restraint on Arm Recovery in Stroke: Randomized Control Trial
Stroke, January 1, 2006; 37(1): 186 - 192.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]