| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Submitted on March 31, 2004
From the Department of Medicine (S.H., M.R.D., R.R.S.) and the Neurological Institute (R.L.S., J.P.M.), Columbia University, New York, NY. * To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: sh23{at}columbia.edu.
Background and Purpose--Patent foramen ovale (PFO) is associated with cryptogenic stroke. There is no study that assessed the effect of age on adverse event rates in cryptogenic stroke patients with PFO. The purpose of this retrospective analysis from PFO in Cryptogenic Stroke Study (PICSS) database was to assess the effect of age on the risk of adverse events in medically treated cryptogenic stroke patients with PFO. Methods--250 cryptogenic stroke patients from PICSS were followed-up for 24 months, with death and recurrent ischemic stroke as primary endpoints. Hazard ratios were calculated for determination of relative risk in cryptogenic stroke patients with and without PFO in 3 age groups (younger than 55, 55 to 64, and 65 years or older). Results--Among the 2 younger age groups, the presence of PFO did not significantly affect the risk of adverse events (P=0.15; hazard ratio=0.21; 95% CI, 0.02 to 1.78; 2-year event rates, 2.0% versus 9.3%; and P=0.70; hazard ratio=0.72; 95% CI, 0.14 to 3.73; 2-year event rates, 10.0% versus 13.9%). However, in those aged 65 years or older, the risk of adverse events was significantly higher in the patients with PFO (P=0.01; hazard ratio=3.21; 95% CI, 1.33 to 7.75; 2-year event rates 37.9% versus 14.5%). Conclusions--In this exploratory analysis, the presence of PFO in the younger cryptogenic stroke patients did not increase the risk of adverse events. However, in the older patients, PFO significantly increased the risk of adverse events.
Revised on May 15, 2004
Accepted on May 26, 2004
Age As a Determinant of Adverse Events in Medically Treated Cryptogenic Stroke Patients With Patent Foramen Ovale
Shunichi Homma MD*;
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
N U Weir An update on cardioembolic stroke Postgrad. Med. J., March 1, 2008; 84(989): 133 - 142. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Handke, A. Harloff, M. Olschewski, A. Hetzel, and A. Geibel Patent Foramen Ovale and Cryptogenic Stroke in Older Patients N. Engl. J. Med., November 29, 2007; 357(22): 2262 - 2268. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Meier Patent Foramen Ovale, Guilty But Only as a Gang Member and for a Lesser Crime J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., January 17, 2006; 47(2): 446 - 448. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. R. Kizer and R. B. Devereux Clinical practice. Patent foramen ovale in young adults with unexplained stroke. N. Engl. J. Med., December 1, 2005; 353(22): 2361 - 2372. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Homma and R. L. Sacco Patent Foramen Ovale and Stroke Circulation, August 16, 2005; 112(7): 1063 - 1072. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
|
Stroke Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2004 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |