Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Stroke
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Published Online
on September 30, 2004

Stroke. 2004
Published online before print September 30, 2004, doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000143453.78005.44
A more recent version of this article appeared on November 1, 2004
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
35/11/2477    most recent
01.STR.0000143453.78005.44v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wardlaw, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Sandercock, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wardlaw, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Sandercock, P.
Related Collections
Right arrow Health policy and outcome research
Right arrow CT and MRI
Right arrow Acute Stroke Syndromes
Right arrow Computerized tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Right arrow Antiplatelets
Right arrow Thrombolysis

Submitted on May 3, 2004
Revised on July 10, 2004
Accepted on July 19, 2004

Immediate Computed Tomography Scanning of Acute Stroke Is Cost-Effective and Improves Quality of Life

Joanna M. Wardlaw FRCP, FRCR, MD*; Janelle Seymour; John Cairns; Sarah Keir MD, MRCP; Steff Lewis PhD; and Peter Sandercock FRCP, MD

From the Division of Clinical Neurosciences (J.M.W., S.K., S.L., P.S.), Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK; and the Health Economics Research Unit (J.S., J.C.), University of Aberdeen, Foresterhill Hospital, Aberdeen, UK.

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: jmw{at}skull.dcn.ed.ac.uk.

Background and Purpose--Stroke is very common, but computed tomography (CT) scanning, an expensive and finite resource, is required to differentiate cerebral infarction, hemorrhage, and stroke mimics. We determined whether, and in what circumstances, CT is cost-effective in acute stroke.

Methods--We developed a decision tree representing acute stroke care pathways populated with data from multiple sources. We determined the effect of diagnostic information from CT scanning on functional outcome, length of stay, costs, and quality of life during 5 years for 13 alternative CT strategies (varying proportions and types of patients and rapidity of scanning).

Results--For 1000 patients aged 70 to 74 years, the policy "scan all strokes within 48 hours" cost £10 279 728 and achieved 1982.3 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). The most cost-effective strategy was "scan all immediately" (£9 993 676 and 1982.4 QALYs). The least cost-effective was "scan patients on anticoagulants and those in a life-threatening condition immediately and the rest within 14 days" (£12 592 666 and 1931.8 QALYs). "Scan no patients" reduced QALYs (1904.2) and increased cost (£10 544 000).

Conclusion--Immediate CT scanning is the most cost-effective strategy. For the majority of acute stroke patients, increasing independent survival by correct early diagnosis, ensuring appropriate subsequent treatment and management decisions, reduced costs of stroke and increased QALYs.


Key words: cerebrovascular disorders • computed tomography • cost-benefit analysis • decision analysis • intracerebral hemorrhage • stroke




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
StrokeHome page
R. I. Lindley
Is Intraarterial tPA Within 3 Hours the Treatment of Choice for Selected Stroke Patients?: No
Stroke, July 1, 2009; 40(7): 2613 - 2614.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
N. Losseff, D. Ames, G. Cloud, G. Cluckie, P. Gompertz, B. Grant, H. Markus, and M. M Brown
The London stroke strategy
BMJ, June 29, 2009; 338(jun29_2): b2616 - b2616.
[Full Text]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
R. B. Gunderman and P. J. Mehta
Continue Drawing Back the Curtain: Educating the Community About Radiology
Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2009; 192(5): 1388 - 1390.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
E. M. de Lucas, E. Sanchez, A. Gutierrez, A. G. Mandly, E. Ruiz, A. F. Florez, J. Izquierdo, J. Arnaiz, T. Piedra, N. Valle, et al.
CT Protocol for Acute Stroke: Tips and Tricks for General Radiologists1
RadioGraphics, October 1, 2008; 28(6): 1673 - 1687.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
R I Lindley
Commentary on NICE guidelines for alteplase for the treatment of acute ischaemic stroke
Heart, December 1, 2007; 93(12): 1617 - 1618.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
QJMHome page
C.J. Dickinson
Intracerebral haemorrhage revisited
QJM, November 1, 2007; 100(11): 715 - 719.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
H. Markus
Improving the outcome of stroke
BMJ, August 25, 2007; 335(7616): 359 - 360.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Age AgeingHome page
P. K. Myint, S. L. Vowler, O. Redmayne, and R. A. Fulcher
Utilisation of diagnostic computerised tomography imaging and immediate clinical outcomes in older people with stroke before and after introduction of the National Service Framework for older people. A comparative study of hospital-based stroke registry data (1997-2003): Norfolk experience.
Age Ageing, July 1, 2006; 35(4): 399 - 403.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
C. Steger, J. Slany, and C. Stollberger
Comment on stroke with atrial fibrillation: data from the Austrian stroke registry: reply
Eur. Heart J., April 2, 2005; 26(8): 848 - 848.
[Full Text] [PDF]