Published Online
on October 28, 2004

A more recent version of this article appeared on December 1, 2004

This Article Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 35/12/2776    most recent 01.STR.0000147037.12223.d5v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Hyde, D. E. Articles by Holdsworth, D. W. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Hyde, D. E. Articles by Holdsworth, D. W. Related Collections Cardiovascular imaging agents/Techniques Carotid Stenosis Angiography Other imaging Carotid endarterectomy

Submitted on January 27, 2004
Revised on September 10, 2004
Accepted on September 13, 2004

Internal Carotid Artery Stenosis Measurement. Comparison of 3D Computed Rotational Angiography and Conventional Digital Subtraction Angiography

Derek E. Hyde PhD; Allan J. Fox MD; Irene Gulka MD; Paul Kalapos MD; Don H. Lee MD; David M. Pelz MD; and David W. Holdsworth PhD^*

From the Robarts Research Institute (D.E.H., D.W.H.), Imaging Research Laboratories, London, Ontario, Canada; Department of Medical Biophysics (D.E.H., D.W.H.), University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada; and Department of Diagnostic Radiology (A.J.F., I.G., P.K., D.H.L., D.M.P., D.W.H.), London Health Sciences Centre, University Hospital, London, Ontario, Canada. Current affiliation for A.J.F. is Neuroradiology, Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, Sunnybrook and Women’s College Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

^* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: david.holdsworth{at}imaging.robarts.ca.

Background and Purpose--Clinical trials have shown that carotid endarterectomy reduces stroke risk in symptomatic individuals with severe internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis. As a result of these trials, digital subtraction angiography (DSA) became a standard of reference for ICA stenosis diagnosis. Newer 3D techniques provide a larger number of views than DSA, which may influence the estimated degree of stenosis. We evaluate this possibility by directly comparing stenosis grades from 3D computed rotational angiography (CRA) and DSA.

Methods--As a prospective diagnostic study, we performed CRA and DSA on 26 consecutive symptomatic patients. Only 1 angiographic procedure was performed on normal asymptomatic arteries, yielding 42 arteries for comparison. Four neuroradiologists graded the CRA maximum intensity projections (MIPs) and DSA images, according to the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial guidelines. CRA studies included a search for the narrowest view by evaluating 60 MIPs generated at 3° intervals and measurement of actual artery diameters. Artery diameters and stenosis grades were analyzed graphically; statistical significance was determined using a paired t test.

Results--The mean difference of 1.2% (CI, -18%, 21%) between CRA and DSA stenosis grades was not statistically significant (P=0.55). Agreement of the optimal CRA viewing angle was limited, with an interobserver variability of 24±13°. The interobserver variability of DSA and CRA stenosis grades, 9.1% (CI, 0%, 21%) and 9.4% (CI, 0%, 22%), respectively, was not significantly different (P=0.79).

Conclusion--CRA provides stenosis grades equivalent to DSA, as well as absolute measurements, providing a comparison for newer 3D techniques.

Key words: angiography • carotid endarterectomy • carotid stenosis • computed tomography

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. Van der Heyden, M. J. Suttorp, E. T. Bal, J. M. Ernst, R. G. Ackerstaff, J. Schaap, J. C. Kelder, M. Schepens, and H. W. Plokker Staged Carotid Angioplasty and Stenting Followed by Cardiac Surgery in Patients With Severe Asymptomatic Carotid Artery Stenosis: Early and Long-Term Results Circulation, October 30, 2007; 116(18): 2036 - 2042. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. Pelz, T. Andersson, M. Soderman, P. Lylyk, and M. Negoro Advances in Interventional Neuroradiology 2005 Stroke, February 1, 2006; 37(2): 309 - 311. [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. E. Heiserman Measurement Error of Percent Diameter Carotid Stenosis Determined by Conventional Angiography: Implications for Noninvasive Evaluation AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., September 1, 2005; 26(8): 2102 - 2107. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]