Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Stroke
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Published Online
on January 27, 2005

Stroke. 2005
Published online before print January 27, 2005, doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000155720.47711.83
A more recent version of this article appeared on March 1, 2005
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
36/3/625    most recent
01.STR.0000155720.47711.83v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Carey, L. M.
Right arrow Articles by Donnan, G. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Carey, L. M.
Right arrow Articles by Donnan, G. A.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
Medline Plus Health Information
*Stroke
Related Collections
Right arrow Behavioral Changes and Stroke
Right arrow PET and SPECT
Right arrow Rehabilitation, Stroke

Submitted on August 5, 2004
Revised on October 29, 2004
Accepted on December 7, 2004

Motor Impairment and Recovery in the Upper Limb After Stroke. Behavioral and Neuroanatomical Correlates

Leeanne M. Carey PhD*; David F. Abbott PhD; Gary F. Egan PhD; Julie Bernhardt PhD; and Geoffrey A. Donnan MD

From the National Stroke Research Institute (L.M.C., J.B., G.A.D.) and Brain Research Institute (D.F.A.), Austin Health, Heidelberg West; LaTrobe University (L.M.C.), Bundoora; and Howard Florey Institute (G.F.E.), Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: lcarey{at}nsri.org.au.

Background and Purpose--Motor recovery after stroke is associated with cerebral reorganization. However, few studies have investigated the relationship directly, and findings are equivocal. We therefore aimed to characterize the relationship between motor impairment, motor recovery, and task-related changes in regional cerebral blood flow ({Delta}rCBF) longitudinally.

Methods--We obtained a profile of motor impairment and recovery in the upper limb and conducted positron emission tomography motor activation studies using a simple finger-tapping task in 9 stroke patients 2 to 7 weeks after stroke and 6 months later. For correlation analysis, mean images of task-related {Delta}rCBF for each individual were linearly regressed with motor impairment scores. Motor recovery was correlated with longitudinal {Delta}rCBF images.

Results--Patients (7 males; 72.0±9.8 years) demonstrated a wide range of impairment severity and variable recovery. Upper-limb motor function was linearly correlated with task-related {Delta}rCBF. Importantly, sites of correlated {Delta}rCBF differed over time. Subacutely correlated {Delta}rCBF was observed in supplementary motor area (SMA), bilateral cingulate, and contralesional insula with a small area in ipsilesional primary sensorimotor cortex (SM1). Conversely, at the 6-month study, correlated {Delta}rCBF was primarily in ipsilesional SM1, extending to the cingulate gyrus. Better motor recovery was correlated with reduction in contralesional activity and increase in ipsilesional SM1.

Conclusions--Upper-limb motor function and recovery are correlated with {Delta}rCBF in SMA, cingulate, insula, and SM1, highlighting the role of these areas in the recovery process. The dynamic nature of the relationship suggests ongoing adaptation within motor networks.


Key words: brain mapping • cerebrovascular accident • neuronal plasticity • recovery of function • upper extremity




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
StrokeHome page
C. Enzinger, H. Johansen-Berg, H. Dawes, M. Bogdanovic, J. Collett, C. Guy, S. Ropele, U. Kischka, D. Wade, F. Fazekas, et al.
Functional MRI Correlates of Lower Limb Function in Stroke Victims With Gait Impairment
Stroke, May 1, 2008; 39(5): 1507 - 1513.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Neurorehabil Neural RepairHome page
P. G. Lindberg, C. Schmitz, M. Engardt, H. Forssberg, and J. Borg
Use-Dependent Up- and Down-Regulation of Sensorimotor Brain Circuits in Stroke Patients
Neurorehabil Neural Repair, July 1, 2007; 21(4): 315 - 326.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. PsychiatryHome page
M Moller, J Frandsen, G Andersen, A Gjedde, P Vestergaard-Poulsen, and L Ostergaard
Dynamic changes in corticospinal tracts after stroke detected by fibretracking
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, June 1, 2007; 78(6): 587 - 592.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BrainHome page
C. M. Stinear, P. A. Barber, P. R. Smale, J. P. Coxon, M. K. Fleming, and W. D. Byblow
Functional potential in chronic stroke patients depends on corticospinal tract integrity
Brain, January 1, 2007; 130(1): 170 - 180.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Neurorehabil Neural RepairHome page
L. M. Carey, D. F. Abbott, G. F. Egan, G. J. O'Keefe, G. D. Jackson, J. Bernhardt, and G. A. Donnan
Evolution of Brain Activation with Good and Poor Motor Recovery after Stroke
Neurorehabil Neural Repair, March 1, 2006; 20(1): 24 - 41.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
W.-D. Heiss and R. W. Teasel
Brain Recovery and Rehabilitation
Stroke, February 1, 2006; 37(2): 314 - 316.
[Full Text] [PDF]