Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Stroke
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Published Online
on April 14, 2005

Stroke. 2005
Published online before print April 14, 2005, doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000163109.67851.a0
A more recent version of this article appeared on May 1, 2005
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
36/5/e50    most recent
01.STR.0000163109.67851.a0v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cramer, S. C.
Right arrow Articles by Lutsep, H. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cramer, S. C.
Right arrow Articles by Lutsep, H. L.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
Medline Plus Health Information
*MRI Scans
*Stroke
Related Collections
Right arrow Exercise/exercise testing/rehabilitation
Right arrow Other Treatment
Right arrow CT and MRI
Right arrow Computerized tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Right arrow Rehabilitation, Stroke

Submitted on January 12, 2005
Accepted on January 27, 2005

Use of Functional MRI to Guide Decisions in a Clinical Stroke Trial

Steven C. Cramer MD*; Randall R. Benson MD; David M. Himes BS; Vijaya C. Burra MS; Jeri S. Janowsky PhD; Martin E. Weinand MD; Jeffrey A. Brown MD; and Helmi L. Lutsep MD

From the University of California (S.C.C.), Irvine, Calif and the UCI Medical Center, Orange, Calif; Wayne State University (R.R.B., V.C.B., J.A.B.), Detroit, Mich, and the Department of Neurology-UHC 8D, Detroit, Mich; Northstar Neuroscience, Inc (D.M.H.), Seattle, Wash; the Oregon Health & Science University (J.S.J., H.L.L.), Portland, Ore; and the University of Arizona (M.E.W.), Tucson, Ariz.

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: scramer{at}uci.edu.

Background and Purpose--An investigational trial examined safety and efficacy of targeted subthreshold cortical stimulation in patients with chronic stroke. The anatomical location for the target, hand motor area, varies across subjects, and so was localized with functional MRI (fMRI). This report describes the experience of incorporating standardized fMRI into a multisite stroke trial.

Methods--At 3 enrollment centers, patients moved (0.25 Hz) the affected hand during fMRI. Hand motor function was localized at a fourth center guiding intervention for those randomized to stimulation.

Results--The fMRI results were available within 24 hours. Across 12 patients, activation site variability was substantial (12, 23, and 11 mm in x, y, and z directions), exceeding stimulating electrode dimensions.

Conclusion--Use of fMRI to guide decision-making in a clinical stroke trial is feasible.


Key words: magnetic resonance imaging • motor activity • neuronal plasticity • stroke




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Neurorehabil Neural RepairHome page
S. J. Page, J. P. Szaflarski, J. C. Eliassen, H. Pan, and S. C. Cramer
Cortical Plasticity Following Motor Skill Learning During Mental Practice in Stroke
Neurorehabil Neural Repair, May 1, 2009; 23(4): 382 - 388.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
S. C. Cramer, T. B. Parrish, R. M. Levy, G. T. Stebbins, S. D. Ruland, D. W. Lowry, T. P. Trouard, S. W. Squire, M. E. Weinand, C. R. Savage, et al.
Predicting Functional Gains in a Stroke Trial
Stroke, July 1, 2007; 38(7): 2108 - 2114.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]