Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Stroke
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Published Online
on May 26, 2005

Stroke. 2005
Published online before print May 26, 2005, doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000169923.57038.a8
A more recent version of this article appeared on July 1, 2005
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
36/7/1519    most recent
01.STR.0000169923.57038.a8v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tooth, L.
Right arrow Articles by Varghese, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tooth, L.
Right arrow Articles by Varghese, P.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
Medline Plus Health Information
*Stroke
Related Collections
Right arrow Health policy and outcome research
Right arrow Rehabilitation, Stroke

Submitted on December 16, 2004
Revised on February 13, 2005
Accepted on April 6, 2005

Length of Stay, Discharge Destination, and Functional Improvement. Utility of the Australian National Subacute and Nonacute Patient Casemix Classification

Leigh Tooth PhD*; Kryss McKenna PhD; Kong Goh FAFRM(RACP); and Paul Varghese FRACP

From the Division of Occupational Therapy (K.M.), School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland; the Clinical Director (K.G.), Rehabilitation Medicine Gold Coast Hospital, Southport, Queensland; the Director of Geriatric Medicine (P.V.), Princess Alexandra Hospital, Woolloongabba, Brisbane, Queensland; and the School of Population Health (L.T.), University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: L.Tooth{at}sph.uq.edu.au.

Background and Purpose--Although implemented in 1998, no research has examined how well the Australian National Subacute and Nonacute Patient (AN-SNAP) Casemix Classification predicts length of stay (LOS), discharge destination, and functional improvement in public hospital stroke rehabilitation units in Australia.

Methods--406 consecutive admissions to 3 stroke rehabilitation units in Queensland, Australia were studied. Sociodemographic, clinical, and functional data were collected. General linear modeling and logistic regression were used to assess the ability of AN-SNAP to predict outcomes.

Results--AN-SNAP significantly predicted each outcome. There were clear relationships between the outcomes of longer LOS, poorer functional improvement and discharge into care, and the AN-SNAP classes that reflected poorer functional ability and older age. Other predictors included living situation, acute LOS, comorbidity, and stroke type.

Conclusions--AN-SNAP is a consistent predictor of LOS, functional change and discharge destination, and has utility in assisting clinicians to set rehabilitation goals and plan discharge.


Key words: rehabilitation • stroke outcome




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
StrokeHome page
J. Nuyen, P. M. Spreeuwenberg, P. P. Groenewegen, G. A.M. van den Bos, and F. G. Schellevis
Impact of Preexisting Depression on Length of Stay and Discharge Destination Among Patients Hospitalized for Acute Stroke: Linked Register-Based Study
Stroke, January 1, 2008; 39(1): 132 - 138.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]