Published Online
on June 9, 2005

A more recent version of this article appeared on July 1, 2005

This Article Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 36/7/1457    most recent 01.STR.0000170698.20376.2ev1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Lord, S. E. Articles by Rochester, L. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Lord, S. E. Articles by Rochester, L. Pubmed/NCBI databases Medline Plus Health Information Stroke Related Collections Exercise/exercise testing/rehabilitation Acute Cerebral Infarction Acute Stroke Syndromes

Submitted on October 19, 2004
Revised on March 16, 2005
Accepted on April 14, 2005

Measurement of Community Ambulation After Stroke. Current Status and Future Developments

Susan E. Lord MSc^* and Lynn Rochester PhD

From the Department of Medicine (Rehabilitation; S.E.L.), Wellington School of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Otago, Wellington South, New Zealand; and the School of Health (L.R.), Community and Education Studies, Northumbria University, Coach Lane, Benton, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.

^* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: sue.lord{at}ts.co.nz.

Background and Purpose--This report considers the measurement of community ambulation for people with stroke. The conceptual issues underlying measurement of community ambulation are reviewed, and tests that measure either the task itself or at least some of its components are identified and discussed.

Conclusions--The findings from this review suggest that although some progress has been made toward identifying community ambulation as a stand-alone entity, reliable and valid measures have not yet been developed. Gait speed, which is used often as a proxy measure for community ambulation, does not consistently reflect the level of community ambulation attained, and continued reliance on its use, particularly the 10-m timed walk, is misplaced. The limitations of the measures reviewed here point toward self-report as being the most useful outcome for current clinical use. However, this report highlights the need for research to first inform a theoretical framework for the measurement of community ambulation, from which a measurement tool or a battery of measurements can be developed and tested.

Key words: ambulation • community • gait • mobility • stroke, acute

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D. S. Reisman, R. Wityk, K. Silver, and A. J. Bastian Split-Belt Treadmill Adaptation Transfers to Overground Walking in Persons Poststroke Neurorehabil Neural Repair, September 1, 2009; 23(7): 735 - 744. [Abstract] [PDF]

				L. Wevers, I. van de Port, M. Vermue, G. Mead, and G. Kwakkel Effects of Task-Oriented Circuit Class Training on Walking Competency After Stroke: A Systematic Review Stroke, July 1, 2009; 40(7): 2450 - 2459. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Dickstein Rehabilitation of Gait Speed After Stroke: A Critical Review of Intervention Approaches Neurorehabil Neural Repair, November 1, 2008; 22(6): 649 - 660. [Abstract] [PDF]

				K. Donovan, S. E Lord, H. K McNaughton, and M. Weatherall Mobility beyond the clinic: the effect of environment on gait and its measurement in community-ambulant stroke survivors Clinical Rehabilitation, June 1, 2008; 22(6): 556 - 563. [Abstract] [PDF]

				T. G. Hornby, D. D. Campbell, J. H. Kahn, T. Demott, J. L. Moore, and H. R. Roth Enhanced Gait-Related Improvements After Therapist- Versus Robotic-Assisted Locomotor Training in Subjects With Chronic Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Study Stroke, June 1, 2008; 39(6): 1786 - 1792. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. A. Schmid, P. W. Duncan, S. Studenski, and L. Richards Response to Letter by Lord and Rochester Stroke, April 1, 2008; 39(4): e76 - e76. [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Lord, K. M McPherson, H. K McNaughton, L. Rochester, and M. Weatherall How feasible is the attainment of community ambulation after stroke? A pilot randomized controlled trial to evaluate community-based physiotherapy in subacute stroke Clinical Rehabilitation, March 1, 2008; 22(3): 215 - 225. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. Schmid, P. W. Duncan, S. Studenski, S. M. Lai, L. Richards, S. Perera, and S. S. Wu Improvements in Speed-Based Gait Classifications Are Meaningful Stroke, July 1, 2007; 38(7): 2096 - 2100. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]