Published Online
on August 11, 2005

A more recent version of this article appeared on September 1, 2005

This Article Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 36/9/1910    most recent 01.STR.0000177610.33478.65v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Aronow, H. D. Articles by Yadav, J. S. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Aronow, H. D. Articles by Yadav, J. S. Related Collections Cerebrovascular disease/stroke Pathophysiology Risk Factors Doppler ultrasound, Transcranial Doppler etc. Angioplasty and Stenting

Submitted on April 17, 2005
Accepted on April 21, 2005

Leukocyte Count Predicts Microembolic Doppler Signals During Carotid Stenting. A Link Between Inflammation and Embolization

Herbert D. Aronow^*; Mehdi Shishehbor; DonaLee A. Davis; Irene L. Katzan; Deepak L. Bhatt; Christopher T. Bajzer; Alex Abou-Chebl; Krieger W. Derk; Patrick L. Whitlow; and Jay S. Yadav

From Michigan Heart P.C. (H.D.A.), Ypsilanti, Michigan; and Cleveland Clinic Foundation (M.S., D.A.D., I.L.K., D.L.B., C.T.B., A.A.-C., K.W.D., P.L.W., J.S.Y.), Cleveland, Ohio.

^* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: haronow{at}michiganheart.com.

Background and Purpose--Protected stenting has emerged as a safe and effective alternative to endarterectomy for the treatment of carotid stenosis in patients at high operative risk. Distal microembolization occurs invariably during carotid stenting. Little is known about the relationship between systemic inflammation and embolization during carotid stenting.

Methods--We examined 43 consecutive patients who underwent carotid stenting with simultaneous transcranial Doppler (TCD) monitoring of the ipsilateral middle cerebral artery. Embolization was quantified by measuring microembolic signals (MES) on TCD. Preprocedure leukocyte counts were related to MES.

Results--In unadjusted analyses, preprocedure leukocyte count was positively correlated with total procedural MES (r²= 0.16; P=0.008). After considering age, gender, comorbidities, concomitant medical therapies, and the use of emboli prevention devices, increasing leukocyte count (=35 for each 1000/µL increment; P=0.018) remained a significant and independent predictor of embolization (model-adjusted r²=0.365; P=0.0005).

Conclusions--Increasing preprocedure leukocyte count independently predicted more frequent MES during carotid stenting. These data suggest that systemic inflammation may influence the degree of procedural embolization.

Key words: inflammation • leukocytes • stents

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. Belkin and D. L. Bhatt Carotid Stenting in the Elderly: Is 80 the New 60? Circulation, May 5, 2009; 119(17): 2302 - 2304. [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Groschel, U. Ernemann, J. Larsen, M. Knauth, F. Schmidt, J. Artschwager, and A. Kastrup Preprocedural C-Reactive Protein Levels Predict Stroke and Death in Patients Undergoing Carotid Stenting AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., October 1, 2007; 28(9): 1743 - 1746. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Chaturvedi and J. S. Yadav The Role of Antiplatelet Therapy in Carotid Stenting for Ischemic Stroke Prevention Stroke, June 1, 2006; 37(6): 1572 - 1577. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]