| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Submitted on March 24, 2005
From the Division of Clinical Pharmacology (A.G., A.D., C.S., S.Y.P., G.F., I.B.), Department of Medicine (A.G., R.A., A.D., C.S., S.Y.P., G.F., I.B.) and Pharmacology (I.B.), and the Autonomic Dysfunction Center, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tenn. * To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: italo.biaggioni{at}vanderbilt.edu.
Background and Purpose--The combination of dipyridamole and aspirin has been shown to be more effective than aspirin alone in the secondary prevention of stroke. Dipyridamole may act by inhibiting adenosine uptake, thus potentiating its actions. Dipyridamole also inhibits cGMP-specific phosphodiesterases (PDE) and, through this mechanism, could potentiate cGMP-mediated actions of nitric oxide. Methods--To define the mechanism of action of dipyridamole, we studied the local vascular effects of adenosine, acetylcholine (NO-mediated dilation), and nitroprusside (cGMP-mediated dilation) in a double-blind study after treatment with dipyridamole/aspirin (200 mg dipyridamole/25 mg aspirin twice a day) or aspirin control for 7 days in 6 normal volunteers. Vasodilators were administered into the brachial artery in the nondominant arm in random order and forearm blood flow (FBF) was measured by venous occlusion plethysmography. Results--Adenosine at a dosage of 125 µg/min increased FBF from 4.6±0.9 to 29.4±5.3 (539% increase) with dipyridamole/aspirin and from 3.9±0.8 to 12±2.5 mL/100 mL forearm/min (208% increase) with aspirin alone (P=0.007). In contrast, dipyridamole/aspirin did not alter the response to acetylcholine or to nitroprusside. The magnitude of adenosine-induced vasodilation correlated with plasma dipyridamole concentrations (r2=0.6); no correlation was observed with acetylcholine- or nitroprusside-induced vasodilation. Similar potentiation of adenosine, but not acetylcholine or nitroprusside, was observed in 7 additional subjects when adenosine, acetylcholine, and nitroprusside were given in random order before and 2 hours after a single dose of dipyridamole/aspirin. Conclusion--The effects of dipyridamole on resistance vessels are preferentially explained by potentiation of adenosine mechanisms rather than potentiation of nitric oxide or other cGMP-mediated actions.
Revised on May 31, 2005
Accepted on June 1, 2005
Role of Adenosine and Nitric Oxide on the Mechanisms of Action of Dipyridamole
Alfredo Gamboa MD;
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
H.-H. Kim and J. K. Liao Translational Therapeutics of Dipyridamole Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., March 1, 2008; 28(3): s39 - s42. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
|
Stroke Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2005 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |