Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Stroke
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Published Online
on December 1, 2005

Stroke. 2005
Published online before print December 1, 2005, doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000195149.44390.aa
A more recent version of this article appeared on January 1, 2006
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
37/1/123    most recent
01.STR.0000195149.44390.aav1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Elkins, J. S.
Right arrow Articles by Johnston, S. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Elkins, J. S.
Right arrow Articles by Johnston, S. C.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
Medline Plus Health Information
*Clinical Trials
*Stroke
Related Collections
Right arrow Health policy and outcome research
Right arrow Acute Cerebral Infarction

Submitted on July 14, 2005
Accepted on August 3, 2005

Recruiting Subjects for Acute Stroke Trials. A Meta-Analysis

Jacob S. Elkins MD; Talayeh Khatabi BA; Lawrence Fung MD; John Rootenberg MD; and S. Claiborne Johnston MD, PhD*

From the University of California, San Francisco (J.S.E., T.K., J.R., S.C.J.); Kaiser Permanente San Francisco, California (L.F.).

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: Clay.Johnston{at}ucsfmedctr.org.

Background and Purpose--Recruitment rate is a major determinant of the duration, cost, and feasibility of acute stroke trials.

Methods--We performed a meta-analysis of all randomized, controlled trials of ≥300 subjects that were designed to evaluate the efficacy of a medical intervention for the treatment of acute ischemic stroke. Data about trial recruitment, organization, and inclusion/exclusion criteria were abstracted independently by 2 reviewers who applied predefined criteria. Recruitment efficiency was defined as the number of subjects enrolled per study center per month of recruitment.

Results--Of 32 trials meeting inclusion criteria, the average recruitment efficiency was 0.79 subjects per center per month (range 0.08 to 3.7). Recruitment efficiency did not vary by geographic region (P=0.36), but trials conducted in 1 country had more efficient recruitment than international studies (P=0.03), and recruitment efficiency declined with each percentage increase in the total number of study centers (P=0.002). The primary study entry criteria that predicted reduced recruitment efficiency were the maximum allowable time from stroke to study enrollment (P=0.002) and the exclusion of mild strokes (P=0.009). Trials with a treatment window >6 hours had approximately double the recruitment rates of trials that used treatment windows ≤6 hours (1.03 versus 0.52 patients per center per month).

Conclusion--Recruitment rates for acute stroke trials are influenced by organizational structure and study entry criteria. Characterizing predictors of recruitment may help optimize future trial design.


Key words: randomized controlled trials • stroke, acute




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
NeurologyHome page
S. E. Kasner, A. Del Giudice, S. Rosenberg, M. Sheen, J. M. Luciano, B. L. Cucchiara, S. R. Messe, L. H. Sansing, and J. M. Baren
Who will participate in acute stroke trials?
Neurology, May 12, 2009; 72(19): 1682 - 1688.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mayo Clin Proc.Home page
B. M. Demaerschalk and J. F. Meschia
Stroke Telemedicine: State of Affairs-Reply-I
Mayo Clin. Proc., May 1, 2009; 84(5): 482 - 483.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NeurologyHome page
W. N. Kernan, C. M. Viscoli, D. DeMarco, B. Mendes, K. Shrauger, J. L. Schindler, J. C. McVeety, A. Sicklick, D. Moalli, P. Greco, et al.
Boosting enrollment in neurology trials with Local Identification and Outreach Networks (LIONs)
Neurology, April 14, 2009; 72(15): 1345 - 1351.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
E. C. Leira, A. Ahmed, D. L. Lamb, H. M. Olalde, R. C. Callison, J. C. Torner, H. P. Adams Jr, and for the AIRDOC study Investigators
Extending Acute Trials to Remote Populations: A Pilot Study During Interhospital Helicopter Transfer
Stroke, March 1, 2009; 40(3): 895 - 901.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NeurologyHome page
M. L. Flaherty, H. Tao, M. Haverbusch, P. Sekar, D. Kleindorfer, B. Kissela, P. Khatri, B. Stettler, O. Adeoye, C. J. Moomaw, et al.
Warfarin use leads to larger intracerebral hematomas
Neurology, September 30, 2008; 71(14): 1084 - 1089.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CJASNHome page
S. T. Crowley, G. M. Chertow, J. Vitale, T. O'Connor, J. Zhang, R. M.H. Schein, D. Choudhury, K. Finkel, A. Vijayan, E. Paganini, et al.
Lessons for Successful Study Enrollment from the Veterans Affairs/National Institutes of Health Acute Renal Failure Trial Network Study
Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., July 1, 2008; 3(4): 955 - 961.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ptjournalHome page
S. Blanton, D. M Morris, M. G Prettyman, K. McCulloch, S. Redmond, K. E Light, and S. L Wolf
Lessons Learned in Participant Recruitment and Retention: The EXCITE Trial
Physical Therapy, November 1, 2006; 86(11): 1520 - 1533.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]