Published Online
on December 22, 2005

A more recent version of this article appeared on February 1, 2006

This Article Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 37/2/388    most recent 01.STR.0000199030.37274.88v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Endo, H. Articles by Ogawa, A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Endo, H. Articles by Ogawa, A.

Submitted on November 8, 2005
Accepted on November 16, 2005

Quantitative Assessment of Cerebral Hemodynamics Using Perfusion-Weighted MRI in Patients With Major Cerebral Artery Occlusive Disease. Comparison With Positron Emission Tomography

Hidehiko Endo MD; Takashi Inoue MD^*; Kuniaki Ogasawara MD; Takeshi Fukuda MD; Yoshiyuki Kanbara;; and Akira Ogawa MD

From the Department of Neurosurgery, School of Medicine, Iwate Medical University, Morioka, Japan.

^* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: tainoue{at}iwate-med.ac.jp.

Background and Purpose--Cerebrovascular reactivity (CVR) to acetazolamide is a key parameter in determining the severity of hemodynamic impairment in patients with major cerebral artery occlusive disease. Perfusion-weighted MRI (PW MRI) can measure the cerebral blood volume (CBV) as an indicator of hemodynamic impairment. CBV measured by PW MRI was compared with CVR measured by positron emission tomography (PET).

Methods--Twelve normal subjects and 17 patients with major cerebral artery occlusive disease underwent PW MRI and PET. The images were coregistered with 3-dimensional spoiled gradient-recalled acquisition images. Quantitative PW MRI-CBV maps were generated using the indicator dilution method with arterial input function. One large cortical region of interest for each unilateral middle cerebral artery territory was determined on each image. PET-CVR was calculated by measuring cerebral blood flow before and after acetazolamide challenge.

Results--A significant negative correlation was observed between PW MRI-CBV and PET-CVR (r=-0.713; P<0.0001). PW MRI-CBV higher than the mean +2 SD obtained in normal subjects (15.2 mL/100 g) was defined as elevated and PET-CVR lower than the mean -2 SD obtained in normal subjects (15.1%) was defined as reduced. Assuming the PET-CVR as the true determinant of hemodynamic impairment, PW MRI-CBV provided 80.0% sensitivity and 91.7% specificity, with 80.0% positive predictive value for detecting patients with reduced CVR.

Conclusions--The PW MRI-CBV method can simply and accurately identify patients with hemodynamic impairment without exposure to ionizing radiation.

Key words: cerebral blood volume • magnetic resonance imaging • perfusion-weighted imaging

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R. Hirooka, K. Ogasawara, T. Inoue, S. Fujiwara, M. Sasaki, K. Chida, D. Ishigaki, M. Kobayashi, H. Nishimoto, Y. Otawara, et al. Simple Assessment of Cerebral Hemodynamics Using Single-Slab 3D Time-of-Flight MR Angiography in Patients with Cervical Internal Carotid Artery Steno-Occlusive Diseases: Comparison with Quantitative Perfusion Single-Photon Emission CT AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., March 1, 2009; 30(3): 559 - 563. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N.-J. Rim, H.S. Kim, Y.S. Shin, and S.Y. Kim Which CT Perfusion Parameter Best Reflects Cerebrovascular Reserve?: Correlation of Acetazolamide-Challenged CT Perfusion with Single-Photon Emission CT in Moyamoya Patients AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., October 1, 2008; 29(9): 1658 - 1663. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Fukuda, K. Ogasawara, M. Kobayashi, N. Komoribayashi, H. Endo, T. Inoue, Y. Kuzu, H. Nishimoto, K. Terasaki, and A. Ogawa Prediction of Cerebral Hyperperfusion after Carotid Endarterectomy Using Cerebral Blood Volume Measured by Perfusion-Weighted MR Imaging Compared with Single-Photon Emission CT AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., April 1, 2007; 28(4): 737 - 742. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]