on March 2, 2006
Published online before print March 2, 2006, doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000206463.66461.97
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Submitted on June 6, 2005
From the Departments of Psychology (E.T., G.U.), Rehabilitation Services (D.K.K.), and Physical Therapy (D.M.), University of Alabama at Birmingham; Research Service, Birmingham Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Alabama (E.T.); and Department of Neurology, University of Pennsylvania (A.C.). * To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: etaub{at}uab.edu.
Background and Purpose--Constraint-Induced Movement therapy (CI therapy) is a neurorehabilitation technique developed to improve use of the more affected upper extremity after stroke. A number of studies have reported positive effects for this intervention, but an experiment with a credible placebo control group has not yet been published. Methods--We conducted a placebo-controlled trial of CI therapy in patients with mild to moderate chronic (mean=4.5 years after stroke) motor deficit after stroke. The CI therapy group received intensive training (shaping) of the more affected upper extremity for 6 hours per day on 10 consecutive weekdays, restraint of the less affected extremity for a target of 90% of waking hours during the 2-week treatment period, and application of a number of other techniques designed to produce transfer to the life situation. The placebo group received a program of physical fitness, cognitive, and relaxation exercises for the same length of time and with the same amount of therapist interaction as the experimental group. Results--After CI therapy, patients showed large (Wolf Motor Function Test) to very large improvements in the functional use of their more affected arm in their daily lives (Motor Activity Log; P<0.0001). The changes persisted over the 2 years tested. Placebo subjects showed no significant changes. Conclusion--The results support the efficacy of CI therapy for rehabilitating upper extremity motor function in patients with chronic stroke.
Revised on July 21, 2005
Accepted on July 22, 2005
A Placebo-Controlled Trial of Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy for Upper Extremity After Stroke
Edward Taub PhD*;
Key words: controlled clinical trials • rehabilitation • stroke • treatment outcome
This article has been cited by other articles:
 |
|
 |
|
  L. V. Gauthier, E. Taub, V. W. Mark, C. Perkins, and G. Uswatte Improvement After Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy Is Independent of Infarct Location in Chronic Stroke Patients * Supplemental Methods Stroke, July 1, 2009; 40(7): 2468 - 2472. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 L. F Ross, L. A Harvey, and N. A Lannin Do people with acquired brain impairment benefit from additional therapy specifically directed at the hand? A randomized controlled trial Clinical Rehabilitation, June 1, 2009; 23(6): 492 - 503. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. Brogardh, U.-B. Flansbjer, and J. Lexell What is the long-term benefit of constraint-induced movement therapy? A four-year follow-up Clinical Rehabilitation, May 1, 2009; 23(5): 418 - 423. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. Rijntjes, K. Haevernick, A. Barzel, H. van den Bussche, G. Ketels, and C. Weiller Repeat Therapy for Chronic Motor Stroke: A Pilot Study for Feasibility and Efficacy Neurorehabil Neural Repair, March 1, 2009; 23(3): 275 - 280. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K.-c. Lin, C.-y. Wu, J.-s. Liu, Y.-t. Chen, and C.-j. Hsu Constraint-Induced Therapy Versus Dose-Matched Control Intervention to Improve Motor Ability, Basic/Extended Daily Functions, and Quality of Life in Stroke Neurorehabil Neural Repair, February 1, 2009; 23(2): 160 - 165. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. S. Knutson, T. Z. Hisel, M. Y. Harley, and J. Chae A Novel Functional Electrical Stimulation Treatment for Recovery of Hand Function in Hemiplegia: 12-Week Pilot Study Neurorehabil Neural Repair, January 1, 2009; 23(1): 17 - 25. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 L. R. Cherney, J. P. Patterson, A. Raymer, T. Frymark, and T. Schooling Evidence-Based Systematic Review: Effects of Intensity of Treatment and Constraint-Induced Language Therapy for Individuals With Stroke-Induced Aphasia J Speech Lang Hear Res, October 1, 2008; 51(5): 1282 - 1299. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. Sawaki, A. J. Butler, Xiaoyan Leng, P. A. Wassenaar, Y. M. Mohammad, S. Blanton, K. Sathian, D. S. Nichols-Larsen, S. L. Wolf, D. C. Good, et al. Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy Results in Increased Motor Map Area in Subjects 3 to 9 Months After Stroke Neurorehabil Neural Repair, September 1, 2008; 22(5): 505 - 513. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Dahl, T. Askim, R. Stock, E. Langorgen, S. Lydersen, and B. Indredavik Short- and long-term outcome of constraint-induced movement therapy after stroke: a randomized controlled feasibility trial Clinical Rehabilitation, May 1, 2008; 22(5): 436 - 447. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. Page and P. Levine Author Response Physical Therapy, May 1, 2008; 88(5): 684 - 688. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. V. Gauthier, E. Taub, C. Perkins, M. Ortmann, V. W. Mark, and G. Uswatte Remodeling the Brain: Plastic Structural Brain Changes Produced by Different Motor Therapies After Stroke * Supplemental Material Stroke, May 1, 2008; 39(5): 1520 - 1525. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 V.W. Mark, E. Taub, C. Perkins, L.V. Gauthier, G. Uswatte, and J. Ogorek Poststroke Cerebral Peduncular Atrophy Correlates with a Measure of Corticospinal Tract Injury in the Cerebral Hemisphere AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., February 1, 2008; 29(2): 354 - 358. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. L. Wolf, C. J. Winstein, J. P. Miller, S. Blanton, P. C. Clark, and D. Nichols-Larsen Looking in the Rear View Mirror When Conversing With Back Seat Drivers: The EXCITE Trial Revisited Neurorehabil Neural Repair, October 1, 2007; 21(5): 379 - 387. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. L Wolf Revisiting Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy: Are We Too Smitten With the Mitten? Is All Nonuse "Learned"? and Other Quandaries Physical Therapy, September 1, 2007; 87(9): 1212 - 1223. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. C. Cramer, W. J. Koroshetz, and S. P. Finklestein The Case for Modality-Specific Outcome Measures in Clinical Trials of Stroke Recovery-Promoting Agents Stroke, April 1, 2007; 38(4): 1393 - 1395. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 C. M. Stinear, P. A. Barber, P. R. Smale, J. P. Coxon, M. K. Fleming, and W. D. Byblow Functional potential in chronic stroke patients depends on corticospinal tract integrity Brain, January 1, 2007; 130(1): 170 - 180. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 T. J. Carroll, R. D. Herbert, J. Munn, M. Lee, and S. C. Gandevia Contralateral effects of unilateral strength training: evidence and possible mechanisms J Appl Physiol, November 1, 2006; 101(5): 1514 - 1522. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 G. Uswatte, E. Taub, D. Morris, K. Light, and P. A. Thompson The Motor Activity Log-28: assessing daily use of the hemiparetic arm after stroke. Neurology, October 10, 2006; 67(7): 1189 - 1194. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 Exercise to Stimulate Recovery of Motor Function After Stroke Journal Watch Neurology, September 5, 2006; 2006(905): 2 - 2. [Full Text]
|
|