Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Stroke
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Published Online
on March 30, 2006

Stroke. 2006
Published online before print March 30, 2006, doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000217331.61083.3b
A more recent version of this article appeared on May 1, 2006
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
37/5/1195    most recent
01.STR.0000217331.61083.3bv1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Li, Z.-Y.
Right arrow Articles by Gillard, J. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Li, Z.-Y.
Right arrow Articles by Gillard, J. H.
Related Collections
Right arrow Risk Factors
Right arrow Carotid Stenosis
Right arrow Risk Factors for Stroke
Right arrow Carotid endarterectomy

Submitted on January 18, 2006
Accepted on February 10, 2006

How Critical Is Fibrous Cap Thickness to Carotid Plaque Stability? A Flow-Plaque Interaction Model

Zhi-Yong Li PhD*; Simon P.S. Howarth MRCS, Eng; Tjun Tang MRCS; and Jonathan H. Gillard FRCR

From the Department of Radiology, University of Cambridge and Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge, UK.

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: ZYL22{at}cam.ac.uk.

Background and Purpose--Acute cerebral ischemic events are associated with rupture of vulnerable carotid atheroma and subsequent thrombosis. Factors such as luminal stenosis and fibrous cap thickness have been thought to be important risk factors for plaque rupture. We used a flow-structure interaction model to simulate the interaction between blood flow and atheromatous plaque to evaluate the effect of the degree of luminal stenosis and fibrous cap thickness on plaque vulnerability.

Methods--A coupled nonlinear time-dependent model with a flow-plaque interaction simulation was used to perform flow and stress/strain analysis in a stenotic carotid artery model. The stress distribution within the plaque and the flow conditions within the vessel were calculated for every case when varying the fibrous cap thickness from 0.1 to 2 mm and the degree of luminal stenosis from 10% to 95%. A rupture stress of 300 kPa was chosen to indicate a high risk of plaque rupture. A 1-sample t test was used to compare plaque stresses with the rupture stress.

Results--High stress concentrations were found in the plaques in arteries with >70% degree of stenosis. Plaque stresses in arteries with 30% to 70% stenosis increased exponentially as fibrous cap thickness decreased. A decrease of fibrous cap thickness from 0.4 to 0.2 mm resulted in an increase of plaque stress from 141 to 409 kPa in a 40% degree stenotic artery.

Conclusions--There is an increase in plaque stress in arteries with a thin fibrous cap. The presence of a moderate carotid stenosis (30% to 70%) with a thin fibrous cap indicates a high risk for plaque rupture. Patients in the future may be risk stratified by measuring both fibrous cap thickness and luminal stenosis.


Key words: atherosclerosis • carotid stenosis • rupture • stress • stroke




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Phil Trans R Soc AHome page
N. El Khatib, S. Genieys, B. Kazmierczak, and V. Volpert
Mathematical modelling of atherosclerosis as an inflammatory disease
Phil Trans R Soc A, December 13, 2009; 367(1908): 4877 - 4886.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
K. Lee, G. M. Saidel, and M. S. Penn
Permeability change of arterial endothelium is an age-dependent function of lesion size in apolipoprotein E-null mice
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, December 1, 2008; 295(6): H2273 - H2279.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
H. Beaussier, I. Masson, C. Collin, E. Bozec, B. Laloux, D. Calvet, M. Zidi, P. Boutouyrie, and S. Laurent
Carotid Plaque, Arterial Stiffness Gradient, and Remodeling in Hypertension
Hypertension, October 1, 2008; 52(4): 729 - 736.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
Z.-Y. Li and J. H. Gillard
Plaque Rupture: Plaque Stress, Shear Stress, and Pressure Drop
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., September 23, 2008; 52(13): 1106 - 1107.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
T. Hiro, Y. Fukumoto, T. Fujii, and M. Matsuzaki
Reply
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., September 23, 2008; 52(13): 1107 - 1107.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
Z.-Y. Li and J. H. Gillard
Plaque Rupture: Plaque Stress, Shear Stress, and Pressure Drop
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., August 5, 2008; 52(6): 499 - 500.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
J. N. Redgrave, P. Gallagher, J. K. Lovett, and P. M. Rothwell
Critical Cap Thickness and Rupture in Symptomatic Carotid Plaques: The Oxford Plaque Study
Stroke, June 1, 2008; 39(6): 1722 - 1729.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
T. Karapanayiotides and G. Devuyst
Fibrous Cap Thickness and Stability of Carotid Atheromata
Stroke, October 1, 2006; 37(10): 2451 - 2451.
[Full Text] [PDF]