Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Stroke
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Published Online
on June 22, 2006

Stroke. 2006
Published online before print June 22, 2006, doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000231644.47325.aa
A more recent version of this article appeared on August 1, 2006
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
37/8/2039    most recent
01.STR.0000231644.47325.aav1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Poppert, H.
Right arrow Articles by Sander, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Poppert, H.
Right arrow Articles by Sander, D.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
Medline Plus Health Information
*Stroke
*Transient Ischemic Attack
Related Collections
Right arrow Heparin
Right arrow Acute Cerebral Infarction
Right arrow Carotid Stenosis
Right arrow Embolic stroke
Right arrow Doppler ultrasound, Transcranial Doppler etc.
Right arrow Anticoagulants
Right arrow Antiplatelets

Submitted on January 10, 2006
Revised on April 11, 2006
Accepted on May 3, 2006

Embolic Signals in Unselected Stroke Patients. Prevalence and Diagnostic Benefit

Holger Poppert MD*; Suwad Sadikovic; Kerstin Sander MD; Oliver Wolf MD; and Dirk Sander MD

From the Department of Neurology (S.S., K.S., D.S., H.P.), Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Munich University of Technology, Muenchen, Germany; and the Department of Vascular Surgery (O.W.), Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Munich University of Technology, Muenchen, Germany.

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: poppert{at}neuro.med.tu-muenchen.de.

Background and Purpose--The present study investigated the prevalence of cerebral microemboli detected by transcranial Doppler sonography in unselected stroke and transient ischemic attack (TIA) patients under standard clinical conditions. We aimed to evaluate the feasibility and the value of the method for clinical use.

Methods--The records of 937 consecutive patients who were investigated between October 1995 and August 2004 at our institution were reviewed. Stroke or TIA were subtyped using the TOAST classification criteria.

Results--Two hundred and eighty-four subjects were excluded because there was an interval of >14 days between onset of symptoms and examination, no definite diagnosis of stroke or TIA at discharge, or an artificial heart valve. Embolic signals (ES) were detected in 37 (5.7%) of the remaining 653 patients. In subjects with positive ES detection the mean interval between symptom onset and ES detection was 4.9 (SD 4.0) days compared with 5.4 (SD 3.5) days in the remaining patients (P=0.01). ES were more common in patients with large-artery atherosclerosis compared with other subtype groups (P<0.001). The proportion of detected signals was influenced by the antihemostatic treatment: ES were found more often in anticoagulated patients than in patients receiving antiplatelet medication (P<0.001).

Conclusions--The study shows a high clinical significance of ES in patients with recent stroke attributable to arterio-arterial embolism or of cardiac embolic origin and the high specificity of the technique. Given the low sensitivity shown, ES detection cannot generally be recommended for routine diagnostics in stroke patients.


Key words: cerebrovascular accident • intracranial embolism • ultrasonography • ultrasonography, Doppler, transcranial