Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Stroke
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Published Online
on October 19, 2006

Stroke. 2006
Published online before print October 19, 2006, doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000248457.55493.85
A more recent version of this article appeared on December 1, 2006
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
37/12/3019    most recent
01.STR.0000248457.55493.85v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gralla, J.
Right arrow Articles by Brekenfeld, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gralla, J.
Right arrow Articles by Brekenfeld, C.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
Medline Plus Health Information
*Stroke
Related Collections
Right arrow Animal models of human disease
Right arrow Embolic stroke
Right arrow Emergency treatment of Stroke
Right arrow Angiography

Submitted on January 17, 2006
Revised on April 13, 2006
Accepted on April 28, 2006

Mechanical Thrombectomy for Acute Ischemic Stroke. Thrombus-Device Interaction, Efficiency, and Complications In Vivo

Jan Gralla MD; Gerhard Schroth MD; Luca Remonda MD; Krassen Nedeltchev MD; Johannes Slotboom PhD; and Caspar Brekenfeld MD*

From the Departments of Interventional and Diagnostic Neuroradiology (J.G., G.S., L.R., J.S., C.B.), Interventional and Diagnostic Radiology (J.G.), and Neurology (K.N.), University of Bern, Switzerland.

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: caspar.brekenfeld{at}insel.ch.

Background and Purpose--Mechanical thrombectomy is a promising new modality of interventional stroke treatment. The various devices differ with regard to where they apply force on the thrombus, taking a proximal approach such as aspiration devices or a distal approach such as basket-like devices. The study compares the in vivo effectiveness and thrombus-device interaction of these 2 approaches.

Methods--Angiography and embolization with a radioopaque whole blood thrombus was performed in 10 swine. Mechanical thrombectomy was performed in 20 cranial vessels using a proximal aspiration device (Vasco35) and a distal basket-like device (Catch) with and without proximal balloon occlusion. Fifty-six retrieval attempts were made.

Results--The proximal device allowed fast repeated application with a low risk of thromboembolic events (3%) and vasospasm, but it had a significantly lower success rate (39.4%) in retrieving thrombotic material than the distal device (DD) (82.6%; odds ratio, 7.3; 95% CI, 2.0 to 26.4). The compaction of the thrombus during retrieval with DD increased the risk of vessel wall irritation significantly (P<0.01) and complicated retrieval into the guiding catheter. The number of embolic events was significantly higher with DD (26%; odds ratio, 11.3; 95% CI, 1.35 to 101.6) unless proximal balloon occlusion was used.

Conclusions--The proximal and the distal approaches to mechanical thrombectomy proved to be effective at achieving recanalization of cranial vessels. The proximal device is faster in application and allowed repeated attempts with a low complication rate. The DD is more successful at removing thrombotic material, but its method of application and attendant thrombus compaction increase the risk of thromboembolic events and vasospasms.


Key words: animal models • embolic stroke • interventional neuroradiology • stroke




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
C. Brekenfeld, P. Tinguely, G. Schroth, M. Arnold, M. El-Koussy, K. Nedeltchev, J.V. Byrne, and J. Gralla
Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty and Stent Placement in Acute Vessel Occlusion: Evaluation of New Methods for Interventional Stroke Treatment
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., June 1, 2009; 30(6): 1165 - 1172.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
R.G. Nogueira, L.H. Schwamm, and J.A. Hirsch
Endovascular Approaches to Acute Stroke, Part 1: Drugs, Devices, and Data
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., April 1, 2009; 30(4): 649 - 661.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
C. Brekenfeld, G. Schroth, M. El-Koussy, K. Nedeltchev, M. Reinert, J. Slotboom, and J. Gralla
Mechanical Thromboembolectomy for Acute Ischemic Stroke: Comparison of the Catch Thromboectomy Device and the Merci Retriever In Vivo
Stroke, April 1, 2008; 39(4): 1213 - 1219.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
J. Gralla, M. Burkhardt, G. Schroth, M. El-Koussy, M. Reinert, K. Nedeltchev, J. Slotboom, and C. Brekenfeld
Occlusion Length Is a Crucial Determinant of Efficiency and Complication Rate in Thrombectomy for Acute Ischemic Stroke
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., February 1, 2008; 29(2): 247 - 252.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
J. Slotboom
Localized therapeutic hypothermia in the brain for the treatment of ischemic stroke
J Appl Physiol, April 1, 2007; 102(4): 1303 - 1304.
[Full Text] [PDF]