| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Submitted on May 29, 2006
From Stroke Center and Department of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Calif. * To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: jsaver{at}ucla.edu.
Background and Purpose--Baseline severity-adjusted end point analysis, an emerging approach to the evaluation of primary end points in acute stroke trials, offers a novel means of adjusting trial analysis for baseline imbalances in presenting stroke severity among treatment groups, a factor that has complicated interpretation and reception of the results of the pivotal National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke tissue plasminogen activator (NINDS-tPA) trials. Methods--The sliding scale dichotomy end point responder analysis applied in recent acute ischemic stroke clinical trials was used to analyze NINDS-tPA stroke trials 1 and 2. Good outcomes were: 3-month Rankin scale=0 if pretreatment NIHSS scores were 1 to 7; 3-month Rankin scale=0 to 1 if pretreatment NIHSS scores were 8 to 14; 3-month Rankin scale=0 to 2 if pretreatment NIHSS scores were >14. Results--Both of the NINDS-tPA stroke trials showed a statistically significant beneficial treatment effect of tPA. In unadjusted analyses, in trial 1, good outcomes in tPA versus placebo patients were 39.6% versus 28.6% (odds ratio 1.64, P=0.049); in trial 2, 35.7% versus 24.2% (odds ratio 1.74, P=0.024). Among all 624 patients in trials 1 and 2 combined, good outcomes occurred in 37.5% versus 26.3% patients (odds ratio 1.68, P=0.0034). In the 91- to 180-minute onset to treatment time subgroup of patients among whom baseline severity imbalance was particularly severe, good outcomes were noted in 36.1% versus 24.0% (odds ratio 1.80, P=0.021). Odds ratios favoring tPA generally further increased after adjustment for 12 additional covariates known to predict acute stroke outcome. Conclusion--Baseline-adjusted severity end point reanalysis of the NINDS Stroke tPA trials confirms a beneficial treatment effect of intravenous tPA.
Revised on September 1, 2006
Accepted on September 11, 2006
Confirmation of tPA Treatment Effect by Baseline Severity-Adjusted End Point Reanalysis of the NINDS-tPA Stroke Trials
Jeffrey L. Saver MD* and Banafsheh Yafeh MD
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. C. Chavez, O. Hurko, F. C. Barone, and G. Z. Feuerstein Pharmacologic Interventions for Stroke: Looking Beyond the Thrombolysis Time Window Into the Penumbra With Biomarkers, Not a Stopwatch Stroke, October 1, 2009; 40(10): e558 - e563. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Thrombolytic therapy with alteplase for ischaemic stroke DTB, February 1, 2009; 47(2): 14 - 18. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. J. Alberts, R. A. Felberg, L. R. Guterman, S. R. Levine, and for Writing Group 4 Atherosclerotic Peripheral Vascular Disease Symposium II: Stroke Intervention: State of the Art Circulation, December 16, 2008; 118(25): 2845 - 2851. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Zwienenberg-Lee, J. Hartman, N. Rudisill, L. K. Madden, K. Smith, J. Eskridge, D. Newell, B. Verweij, M. R. Bullock, A. Baker, et al. Effect of Prophylactic Transluminal Balloon Angioplasty on Cerebral Vasospasm and Outcome in Patients With Fisher Grade III Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: Results of a Phase II Multicenter, Randomized, Clinical Trial Stroke, June 1, 2008; 39(6): 1759 - 1765. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. L. Saver Novel End Point Analytic Techniques and Interpreting Shifts Across the Entire Range of Outcome Scales in Acute Stroke Trials Stroke, November 1, 2007; 38(11): 3055 - 3062. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
|
Stroke Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2007 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |