Published Online
on December 14, 2006

A more recent version of this article appeared on February 1, 2007

This Article Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 38/2/286    most recent 01.STR.0000254596.81137.51v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Bartlett, E. S. Articles by Fox, A. J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Bartlett, E. S. Articles by Fox, A. J. Pubmed/NCBI databases Medline Plus Health Information CT Scans Related Collections CT and MRI Carotid Stenosis Angiography Computerized tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Submitted on August 30, 2006
Accepted on September 25, 2006

Carotid Stenosis Index Revisited With Direct CT Angiography Measurement of Carotid Arteries to Quantify Carotid Stenosis

Eric S. Bartlett MPH, MD^*; Thomas D. Walters MBBS, DCH, FRACP; Sean P. Symons MPH, MD; and Allan J. Fox MD, FRCPC, FACR

From Northwestern University (E.S.B.), Chicago, Illinois; The Hospital for Sick Children (T.D.W.), Toronto, Ontario, Canada; and the University of Toronto (S.P.S., A.J.F.), Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

^* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: ebartlett5544{at}rogers.com.

Background and Purpose--All carotid stenosis ratio methods are based on the inability of digital subtraction angiography to measure in millimeters. Each method has potential flaws. The Carotid Stenosis Index (CSI) was designed to reduce ambiguities of NASCET and ECST ratios. We test this method’s ability to correctly estimate carotid stenosis using direct computed tomography angiography millimeter measures of the carotid arteries.

Methods--Two neuroradiologists reviewed computed tomography angiographies of 268 carotids with atherosclerotic disease. Millimeter measurements were obtained at the narrowest diameter of the residual stenotic lumen, actual carotid bulb diameter (at level of greatest stenosis), and common carotid artery. Pearson correlation compared the CSI estimate of the carotid bulb to the actual carotid bulb measurement. Ratio calculations of the stenosis were performed using (1) CSI carotid bulb estimate and (2) actual carotid bulb measurement as denominator data. A paired-sample Wilcoxon signed rank test compared the results of these 2 ratio measurements per carotid.

Results--Interobserver variability was good to excellent (0.64 to 0.87). The CSI estimate of the carotid bulb size overestimated the measured carotid bulb by an average of 1.5 mm in a random distribution (correlation=0.39, N=151). Paired-sample Wilcoxon signed rank test demonstrated a significant difference between the 2 sets of ratios (z-value of -9.87, P<0.001).

Conclusions--Direct measurement of carotid stenosis, vessel wall soft tissues, and computed tomography plaque imaging is now possible with the high-resolution anatomic data present in high-speed computed tomography angiography, alleviating the need for ratios and inaccurate mathematic estimations of carotid anatomy for carotid stenosis quantification.

Key words: angiography • carotid stenosis • CT • CT angiography • imaging • neuroradiology • radiology

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. J. Fox, S. P. Symons, R. I. Aviv, P. Howard, R. Yeung, and E. S. Bartlett Should Modeling Methodology Suppress Anatomic Excellence? Stroke, November 1, 2009; 40(11): 3411 - 3412. [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. C. Schumacher, P. M. Meyers, R. T. Higashida, C. P. Derdeyn, S. D. Lavine, G. M. Nesbit, D. Sacks, P. Rasmussen, and L. R. Wechsler Reporting Standards for Angioplasty and Stent-Assisted Angioplasty for Intracranial Atherosclerosis Stroke, May 1, 2009; 40(5): e348 - e365. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L.S. Babiarz, J.M. Romero, E.K. Murphy, B. Brobeck, P.W. Schaefer, R.G. Gonzalez, and M.H. Lev Contrast-Enhanced MR Angiography Is Not More Accurate Than Unenhanced 2D Time-of-Flight MR Angiography for Determining >=70% Internal Carotid Artery Stenosis AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., April 1, 2009; 30(4): 761 - 768. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. Runck, R.P. Steiner, W.A. Bautz, and M.M. Lell MR Imaging: Influence of Imaging Technique and Postprocessing on Measurement of Internal Carotid Artery Stenosis AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., October 1, 2008; 29(9): 1736 - 1742. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E.S. Bartlett, T.D. Walters, S.P. Symons, R.I. Aviv, and A.J. Fox Classification of Carotid Stenosis by Millimeter CT Angiography Measures: Effects of Prevalence and Gender AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., October 1, 2008; 29(9): 1677 - 1683. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Bladin, A. V. Alexandrov, and J. Norris Comparison of the Carotid Stenosis Index With CT Angiography Stroke, October 1, 2007; 38(10): e100 - e101. [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. S. Bartlett, T. D. Walters, S. P. Symons, and A. J. Fox Response to Letter by Bladin et al Stroke, October 1, 2007; 38(10): e102 - e102. [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. Schulte-Altedorneburg, F. J. Ahlhelm, E. S. Bartlett, S. P. Symons, and A. J. Fox Simplification of the residual lumen geometry in measuring carodid stenosis. AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., May 1, 2007; 28(5): 804 - 804. [Full Text] [PDF]