Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Stroke
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bralet, J.
Right arrow Articles by Beley, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bralet, J.
Right arrow Articles by Beley, A.

Stroke, Vol 10, 653-656, Copyright © 1979 by American Heart Association


ARTICLES

Influence of various agents on the development of brain edema in the rat following microembolism. Protective effect of gamma-butyrolactone

J Bralet, P Beley, AM Bralet and A Beley

Brain edema was induced in rats by injecting 50 mu microspheres, labelled with 85Sr, into the internal carotid artery. The use of radioactive microspheres as embolic agents enabled the number of microspheres to be determined in each cerebral hemisphere. Edema was assessed 12 or 24 h after embolization by measuring brain water content and, in some experiments, sodium and potassium. Pretreatments with dexamethasone, parachlorophenylalanine (an inhibitor of 5- hydroxytryptamine synthesis), mepyramine and metiamide (H1 and H2 histamine receptor antagonists) or aminophylline did not influence significantly the development of brain edema evaluated 24 h after embolization. Aminophylline treatment (100 mg/kg) markedly increased mortality following embolization. Gamma-butyrolactone (300 mg/kg, every 2 h) inhibited significantly the development of brain edema evaluated 12 hours after embolization. Increases in water and sodium in the embolized cerebral hemisphere were reduced by about 50%. This protective effect may be related to the known depressant action on brain metabolism.