Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Stroke
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Strand, T.
Right arrow Articles by Wester, P. O.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Strand, T.
Right arrow Articles by Wester, P. O.

Stroke, Vol 17, 377-381, Copyright © 1986 by American Heart Association


ARTICLES

Stroke unit care--who benefits? Comparisons with general medical care in relation to prognostic indicators on admission

T Strand, K Asplund, S Eriksson, E Hagg, F Lithner and PO Wester

The clinical outcome in 110 patients admitted to a non-intensive stroke unit was compared to that in 183 patients treated for acute stroke in general medical wards. At entry, the two groups of patients were closely similar in all prognostic indicators. Subsets of patients were analyzed in an attempt to identify groups that benefit more than others from stroke unit care. The stroke unit regime had little effect on short-term and long-term mortality rates in the entire stroke population as well as in subgroups. But after the care in the stroke unit, the need for long-term hospitalization in survivors was reduced (p = 0.0001). This difference in favour of the stroke unit was independent of the patients' age, the extent of neurological deficit on admission and previous history. In subgroups where the general prognosis is fair or good (minor neurological deficits and less than 75 yrs), SU care accelerated the process of rehabilitation, but the need for institutional care very late after the stroke was influenced only little. In groups with a poor general prognosis (major deficits and greater than or equal to 75 yrs), the ultimate proportion of patients able to return home was enhanced by SU care. It is concluded that care in a stroke unit benefits the great majority of stroke patients and that such a unit should be designed to admit all acute stroke patients without selection.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
StrokeHome page
S. Olindo, P. Cabre, R. Deschamps, C. Chatot-Henry, P. Rene-Corail, P. Fournerie, M. Saint-Vil, F. May, and D. Smadja
Acute Stroke in the Very Elderly: Epidemiological Features, Stroke Subtypes, Management, and Outcome in Martinique, French West Indies
Stroke, July 1, 2003; 34(7): 1593 - 1597.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
J. J. Caro, K. F. Huybrechts, and H. E. Kelley
Predicting Treatment Costs After Acute Ischemic Stroke on the Basis of Patient Characteristics at Presentation and Early Dysfunction
Stroke, January 1, 2001; 32(1): 100 - 106.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
B. Fagerberg, L. Claesson, G. Gosman-Hedstrom, and C. Blomstrand
Effect of Acute Stroke Unit Care Integrated With Care Continuum Versus Conventional Treatment: A Randomized 1-Year Study of Elderly Patients : The Goteborg 70+ Stroke Study
Stroke, November 1, 2000; 31(11): 2578 - 2584.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
J. J. Caro, K. F. Huybrechts, and I. Duchesne
Management Patterns and Costs of Acute Ischemic Stroke : An International Study
Stroke, March 1, 2000; 31(3): 582 - 590.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
T. Steiner, G. Mendoza, M. De Georgia, P. Schellinger, R. Holle, and W. Hacke
Prognosis of Stroke Patients Requiring Mechanical Ventilation in a Neurological Critical Care Unit
Stroke, April 1, 1997; 28(4): 711 - 715.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
StrokeHome page
J. B. Mitchell, D. J. Ballard, J. P. Whisnant, C. J. Ammering, G. P. Samsa, and D. B. Matchar
What Role Do Neurologists Play in Determining the Costs and Outcomes of Stroke Patients?
Stroke, November 1, 1996; 27(11): 1937 - 1943.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
P. J Friedman
Stroke rehabilitation in the elderly: analysis of six years' experience
Clinical Rehabilitation, February 1, 1996; 10(1): 56 - 62.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
M. Kaste, H. Palomaki, and S. Sarna
Where and How Should Elderly Stroke Patients Be Treated? : A Randomized Trial
Stroke, February 1, 1995; 26(2): 249 - 253.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
A. Ashburn, C. Partridge, and L. De Souza
Review article : Physiotherapy in the rehabilitation of stroke: a review
Clinical Rehabilitation, November 1, 1993; 7(4): 337 - 345.
[PDF]


Home page
Vasc MedHome page
J. C Grotta
Prevention and management of stroke
Vascular Medicine, March 1, 1991; 2(1): 3 - 17.
[PDF]


Home page
Arch NeurolHome page
R. M. Parikh, R. G. Robinson, J. R. Lipsey, S. E. Starkstein, J. P. Fedoroff, and T. R. Price
The Impact of Poststroke Depression on Recovery in Activities of Daily Living Over a 2-Year Follow-up
Arch Neurol, July 1, 1990; 47(7): 785 - 789.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
D. Wade
Organization of stroke care services
Clinical Rehabilitation, August 1, 1989; 3(3): 227 - 233.
[PDF]


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
S. R. Levine
Acute Cerebral Ischemia in a Critical Care Unit: A Review of Diagnosis and Management
Arch Intern Med, January 1, 1989; 149(1): 90 - 98.
[Abstract] [PDF]