This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Mirro, R. Articles by Leffler, C. W. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Mirro, R. Articles by Leffler, C. W.

Stroke, Vol 23, 1613-1616, Copyright © 1992 by American Heart Association

ARTICLES

Cerebral vasoconstriction in response to hypocapnia is maintained after ischemia/reperfusion injury in newborn pigs

R Mirro, L Lowery-Smith, WM Armstead, M Shibata, SL Zuckerman and CW Leffler
Department of Pediatrics, University of Tennessee, Memphis 38163.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Hypocapnic cerebral vasoconstriction is used therapeutically to reduce elevated intracranial pressure caused by cerebral edema. Because cerebral ischemia/reperfusion injury causes a selective loss of prostanoid-dependent responses, including vasodilation to hypercapnia, we designed these experiments to examine the effect of ischemia/reperfusion on hypocapnic cerebral vasoconstriction. METHODS: Microvascular responses were studied in 10 newborn pigs (closed cranial window) in response to hyperventilation- induced hypocapnia (PaCO2, 22 +/- 2 mm Hg) both before and 45 minutes after 20 minutes of global cerebral ischemia. Responses to hypercapnia (PaCO2, 63 +/- 3 mm Hg), topical isoproterenol (10(-7) M), and norepinephrine (10(-4) M) were also studied before and after ischemia in the same animals for comparison. RESULTS: Before ischemia/reperfusion, pial arterioles vasoconstricted to hypocapnia (- 17 +/- 2%) and norepinephrine (-35 +/- 4%) and vasodilated to CO2 (37 +/- 7%) and isoproterenol (25 +/- 2%). After ischemia/reperfusion, the constriction of pial arterioles to hypocapnia (-19 +/- 2%) was similar to that before ischemia. This is in contrast to the loss of dilation to hypercapnia. Dilation to isoproterenol and constriction to norepinephrine were not affected by ischemia. CONCLUSIONS: Hypocapnic cerebral vasoconstriction is maintained after ischemia/reperfusion. Since prostanoid-dependent responses, such as hypercapnic dilation, are lost following cerebral ischemia, these data suggest that hypocapnic constriction is not dependent on an intact prostanoid system and that cerebral vascular responses to CO2 involve multiple mechanisms, depending on whether CO2 is increasing or decreasing from baseline.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				E. M. Golding, M. L. Steenberg, C. F. Contant Jr., I. Krishnappa, C. S. Robertson, and R. M. Bryan Jr. Cerebrovascular reactivity to CO2 and hypotension after mild cortical impact injury Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, October 1, 1999; 277(4): H1457 - H1466. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]