Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Stroke
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Stroke. 1992;23:1358-1359

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Keilson, G. R.
Right arrow Articles by Recht, L. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Keilson, G. R.
Right arrow Articles by Recht, L. D.

Stroke, Vol 23, 1358-1359, Copyright © 1992 by American Heart Association


ARTICLES

The preponderance of posterior circulatory events is independent of the route of cardiac catheterization

GR Keilson, WJ Schwartz and LD Recht
Department of Neurology, University of Massachusetts Medical Center, Worcester 01655.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Central nervous system complications of cardiac catheterization are most often attributed to embolic events that occur at the time of catheter manipulation. Nevertheless, the reason that over 50% of these events are localized to the posterior circulation remains unexplained. One potential explanation offered for this preponderance is the use of the brachial artery approach. In this report, we examined the relation between the route of catheterization and central nervous system complications. SUMMARY OF REPORT: We retrospectively analyzed all central nervous system complications that occurred after cardiac catheterization through a femoral route at our institution over a 3 1/2-year period. Thirteen patients were identified as having central nervous system complications. Using defined criteria, posterior circulatory events still accounted for at least 54% of central nervous system complications. CONCLUSIONS: The preponderance of posterior circulatory events is apparently independent of the route of catheterization. Furthermore, given the array of neurological symptoms and their often complete resolution, we feel it is unlikely that embolism is the sole pathophysiological mechanism involved in these events.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Arch NeurolHome page
P. Khatri and S. E. Kasner
Ischemic strokes after cardiac catheterization: opportune thrombolysis candidates?
Arch Neurol, June 1, 2006; 63(6): 817 - 821.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. PsychiatryHome page
A. M Kennedy, M. Grocott, M. S Schwartz, H. Modarres, M. Scott, and F. Schon
Median nerve injury: an underrecognised complication of brachial artery cardiac catheterisation?
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, October 1, 1997; 63(4): 542 - 546.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CLIN PEDIATRHome page
R. B. Easley, C. Lastra, and J. D. Tobias
Posterior Cerebral Circulation Infarct Following Cardiac Catheterization and Balloon Angioplasty in an Adolescent
Clinical Pediatrics, September 1, 1997; 36(9): 535 - 538.
[PDF]