Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Stroke
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Stroke. 1993;24:1789-1793

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Keren, O.
Right arrow Articles by Groswasser, Z.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Keren, O.
Right arrow Articles by Groswasser, Z.

Stroke, Vol 24, 1789-1793, Copyright © 1993 by American Heart Association


ARTICLES

Upper limb somatosensory evoked potentials as a predictor of rehabilitation progress in dominant hemisphere stroke patients

O Keren, H Ring, P Solzi, H Pratt and Z Groswasser
Evoked Potentials Laboratory, Loewenstein Rehabilitation Hospital, Ra'anana, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Israel.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to determine the predictive yield of upper limb short latency somatosensory evoked potential (USEP) in patients with first stroke in the dominant hemisphere. METHODS: Nineteen patients (average age, 58 years) were evaluated twice: on arrival at the rehabilitation center, approximately 3 weeks after the stroke, and again approximately 10 weeks later. The clinical assessment included a quantitative evaluation of motor ability, independence in activities of daily living, and communication ability. USEP was recorded during the week of the initial clinical evaluation. Special attention was paid to the relations between USEP parameters and the dynamics of the clinical condition. RESULTS: The seven patients in whom no cortical potential could be detected showed the worst outcomes; however, the existence of cortical potentials in the remaining 12 patients did not provide a precise prediction of their "rehabilitative capacity" (ie, the extent of their progress). A correlation was established between the amplitude of the potentials recorded over both hemispheres and changes in communication ability. Additional findings included an association between shortened central conduction time over the damaged hemisphere during the first month after stroke and improvement in motor ability. CONCLUSIONS: USEP can serve as an adjuvant tool for predicting the recovery progress of stroke patients.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. PsychiatryHome page
H. Feys, J. Van Hees, F. Bruyninckx, R. Mercelis, and W. De Weerdt
Value of somatosensory and motor evoked potentials in predicting arm recovery after a stroke
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, March 1, 2000; 68(3): 323 - 331.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]