Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Stroke
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Stroke. 1994;25:2210-2214

This Article
Right arrow Order Full text via Infotrieve
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kalra, L.
Right arrow Articles by Fowle, A. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kalra, L.
Right arrow Articles by Fowle, A. J.

Stroke, Vol 25, 2210-2214, Copyright © 1994 by American Heart Association


ARTICLES

An integrated system for multidisciplinary assessments in stroke rehabilitation

L Kalra and AJ Fowle
Orpington Stroke Unit, Bromley Hospitals NHS Trust, Kent, UK.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: There is increasing emphasis on the use of integrated systems for timely, accurate, and efficient data collection for a range of service, audit, quality, and research applications. The present study evaluates the acceptability and the quality of data collected on a ward-based system over a 6-month period. METHODS: A multidisciplinary system specific for stroke rehabilitation was used. Members of each discipline were required to enter demographic, medical, nursing, therapy, and psychosocial data as appropriate to their specialty. A users' survey was undertaken at the beginning and at the end of the study. The quality and completeness of data entry were assessed by a "snapshot" of the database at the end of the study period. Primary users (n = 13) included physicians, nurses, and therapists. RESULTS: The user survey at the end of the evaluation showed a significant increase in confidence in using the system. Although the frequency of use had increased, the time spent in data entry had decreased significantly. The increase in work load, estimated at 15 to 60 minutes per week, was considered to be balanced by the benefits in patient care, audit, and research. There were 67 medical and 1046 other assessments on 67 patients entered into the system. Seven patients (11%) had incomplete medical records. Nursing and therapy assessments had been entered for all patients at admission and on discharge, with more than 95% of all possible assessments monitoring recovery being recorded accurately compared with conventional records. CONCLUSIONS: The study showed that it was possible to introduce a computerized multidisciplinary assessment system on rehabilitation wards as a part of day-to-day work without the need for significant extra resources.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
The Diabetes EducatorHome page
L. Courtney, M. Gordon, and L. Romer
A Clinical Path for Adult Diabetes
The Diabetes Educator, January 1, 1997; 23(6): 664 - 671.
[PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
L. Kalra and J. Eade
Role of Stroke Rehabilitation Units in Managing Severe Disability After Stroke
Stroke, November 1, 1995; 26(11): 2031 - 2034.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
StrokeHome page
L. Kalra, G. Yu, K. Wilson, and P. Roots
Medical Complications During Stroke Rehabilitation
Stroke, June 1, 1995; 26(6): 990 - 994.
[Abstract] [Full Text]