| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stroke, Vol 25, 2337-2342, Copyright © 1994 by American Heart Association
T Komiya, M Kudo, T Urabe and Y Mizuno
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Antiplatelet therapy is currently one of the
methods for preventing transient ischemic attacks and cerebral thrombosis.
Because antiplatelet agents are generally administered on a long-term
basis, patient compliance is an important factor. The purpose of this study
was to determine the compliance of patients during antiplatelet therapy by
testing platelet aggregation. METHODS: To establish the conditions for
measuring platelet aggregation, the platelet aggregation test was performed
in patients taking 81 mg/d aspirin or 200 mg/d ticlopidine at the following
final concentrations of aggregation-inducing agents: 0.5, 1, 2, and 4
mumol/L ADP and 0.5 and 2 micrograms/mL collagen. The optimum measurement
conditions for assessing patient compliance were determined. Under the
conditions determined in the first study, platelet aggregation was
assessed, and the effects of treatment were studied in 159 outpatients and
79 inpatients undergoing antiplatelet therapy. If the antiplatelet effect
was insufficient, compliance was checked by interview. RESULTS: The agents
used and the final concentrations found to be optimum for assessing
platelet aggregation were 2 micrograms/mL collagen for patients taking
aspirin 81 mg/day and 2 mumol/L ADP for patients taking ticlopidine 200
mg/d. In 17 (10%) of the 159 outpatients, platelet aggregation was not
adequately reduced because of noncompliance with their antiplatelet
therapy. CONCLUSIONS: This study indicated that monitoring of compliance is
important for outpatients on antiplatelet therapy. It is best if platelet
aggregation can be checked, but when this is impossible it is necessary to
assess compliance periodically and provide patient guidance.
ARTICLES
Compliance with antiplatelet therapy in patients with ischemic cerebrovascular disease. Assessment by platelet aggregation testing
Department of Neurology, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. E. Ramsay, R. W. Morris, O. Papacosta, L. T. Lennon, M. C. Thomas, and P. H. Whincup Secondary prevention of coronary heart disease in older British men: extent of inequalities before and after implementation of the National Service Framework J. Public Health Med., December 1, 2005; 27(4): 338 - 343. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Vucenik and J. J. Podczasy Whole Blood Lumiaggregation: Evaluation of Reagents Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis, October 1, 1998; 4(4): 253 - 256. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. White and S. H. Y. Wong Standards of laboratory practice: analgesic drug monitoring Clin. Chem., May 1, 1998; 44(5): 1110 - 1123. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Patrono and G. J. Roth Aspirin in Ischemic Cerebrovascular Disease : How Strong Is the Case for a Different Dosing Regimen? Stroke, April 1, 1996; 27(4): 756 - 760. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
|
Stroke Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 1994 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |