This Article Full Text Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Chang, Y.-J. Articles by Albers, G. W. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Chang, Y.-J. Articles by Albers, G. W.

(Stroke. 1995;26:1325-1328.)
© 1995 American Heart Association, Inc.

Articles

Detection of Carotid Stenosis

From NASCET Results to Clinical Practice

Yao-Jen Chang, BA; Alexandra J. Golby, BS Gregory W. Albers, MD

From the Stanford Stroke Center, Stanford, Calif.

Correspondence to Gregory W. Albers, MD, Stanford Stroke Center, 701 Welch Rd, Suite 325, Palo Alto, CA 94304-1705.

Background and Purpose Results from large multicenter studies have shown that carotid endarterectomy, performed with low perioperative morbidity and mortality, is beneficial for patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis 70% as calculated according to strict angiographic criteria. To apply these results in clinical practice, individual institutions should determine whether locally implemented duplex ultrasonography adequately identifies patients with 70% stenosis and whether the degree of stenosis reported by local angiographers correlates with strict angiographic measurements.

Methods We compared estimates of carotid stenosis obtained by duplex ultrasonography and the radiologists' reports from conventional cerebral angiography with each other and with results obtained using North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET) criteria.

Results One hundred seventy-one vessels were available for review. In 155 (91%) of the cases, the reports from the ultrasound and angiogram were in agreement with regard to whether the stenosis was 70% or <70%. In 11 of the 16 cases where there was a disparity between the studies, the ultrasound was in closer agreement with measurements obtained using NASCET criteria. Nine of the angiography reports overestimated the degree of stenosis compared with NASCET measurements; twice angiography underestimated the stenosis. Twice the ultrasound underestimated the stenosis, and three times it overestimated the stenosis.

Conclusions Duplex ultrasonography was highly sensitive for detecting significant carotid stenosis at our institution; however, angiography reports often graded the degree of stenosis to be more severe than measurements obtained using NASCET criteria. Institutions that evaluate patients for carotid endarterectomy should investigate the correlation between their ultrasound and angiographic studies so that the results of carotid endarterectomy trials can be accurately applied.

Key Words: angiography • carotid stenosis • ultrasonics

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. M. U-King-Im, M. J. Graves, J. J. Cross, N. J. Higgins, J. Wat, R. A. Trivedi, T. Tang, S. P. S. Howarth, P. J. Kirkpatrick, N. M. Antoun, et al. Internal Carotid Artery Stenosis: Accuracy of Subjective Visual Impression for Evaluation with Digital Subtraction Angiography and Contrast-enhanced MR Angiography Radiology, July 1, 2007; 244(1): 213 - 222. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. Onozuka, M. Muraki, T. Mikami, T. Yoshimoto, T. Yoshizumi, M. Kitaguchi, T. Sugawara, K. Tokuda, S. Kaneko, T. Kashiwaba, et al. Prevalence and Clinical Importance of Spontaneous Echo Contrast Within the Carotid Artery in Patients With Ischemic Cerebrovascular Disease J. Ultrasound Med., February 1, 2007; 26(2): 169 - 177. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Kamouchi, K. Kishikawa, Y. Okada, T. Inoue, S. Ibayashi, and M. Iida Reappraisal of Flow Velocity Ratio in Common Carotid Artery to Predict Hemodynamic Change in Carotid Stenosis AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., April 1, 2005; 26(4): 957 - 962. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. J. Nederkoorn, Y. van der Graaf, and M.G. M. Hunink Duplex Ultrasound and Magnetic Resonance Angiography Compared With Digital Subtraction Angiography in Carotid Artery Stenosis: A Systematic Review Stroke, May 1, 2003; 34(5): 1324 - 1331. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				O. E. H. Elgersma, M. van Leersum, P. C. Buijs, M. S. van Leeuwen, Y. T. van de Schouw, B. C. Eikelboom, and Y. van der Graaf Changes Over Time in Optimal Duplex Threshold for the Identification of Patients Eligible for Carotid Endarterectomy Stroke, November 1, 1998; 29(11): 2352 - 2356. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. N. Purcell and D. C. Brewster When Should Carotid Endarterectomy be Performed on the Basis of Carotid Noninvasive Examination Alone? Perspectives in Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, January 1, 1998; 9(2): 1 - 15. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. V. Alexandrov, D. Vital, D. S. Brodie, P. Hamilton, and J. C. Grotta Grading Carotid Stenosis With Ultrasound : An Interlaboratory Comparison Stroke, June 1, 1997; 28(6): 1208 - 1210. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				A. V. Alexandrov, D. S. Brodie, A. McLean, P. Hamilton, J. Murphy, and P. N. Burns Correlation of Peak Systolic Velocity and Angiographic Measurement of Carotid Stenosis Revisited Stroke, February 1, 1997; 28(2): 339 - 342. [Abstract] [Full Text]