Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Stroke
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lincoln, N.B.
Right arrow Articles by Berman, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lincoln, N.B.
Right arrow Articles by Berman, P.

(Stroke. 1996;27:18-23.)
© 1996 American Heart Association, Inc.


Articles

Comparison of Rehabilitation Practice on Hospital Wards for Stroke Patients

N.B. Lincoln, PhD; D. Willis, BA; S.A. Philips, MSc; L.C. Juby, MMedSci P. Berman, FRCP

From the Stroke Research Unit and Department of Health Care of the Elderly (P.B.), City Hospital, Nottingham, UK.

Correspondence to Dr N.B. Lincoln, Stroke Research Unit, Nottingham City Hospital, Hucknall Rd, Nottingham NG5 1PB.

Background and Purpose The aim of the study was to observe patients on a stroke unit and to compare their activity with that of patients on conventional hospital wards to identify aspects of rehabilitation practice that might account for differences in outcome.

Methods Stroke patients admitted to the hospital were observed on three 8-hour shifts over 3 consecutive days. An observer recorded, at 10-minute intervals, where patients were, what they were doing, and whether their positioning was as recommended by rehabilitation therapists. Patients on a stroke unit were compared with those on conventional wards.

Results Stroke unit patients spent less time by their beds and more time in other locations on the ward (P<.001). There were significant differences in the frequency of behaviors observed in the two types of ward (P<.001). Stroke unit patients had significantly more interaction with nurses and therapists (P<.001). They were also more often in the recommended position (P<.001).

Conclusions The proportion of time in therapeutic activity was low in all locations, with patients spending many hours sitting and doing nothing. Despite this, stroke unit patients had more therapeutic contact with staff and were more often in the recommended position. These two features may account for some of the differences in outcome.


Key Words: hospitalization • outcome • rehabilitation • stroke units




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Age AgeingHome page
D. Hargroves, R. Tallis, V. Pomeroy, and A. Bhalla
The influence of positioning upon cerebral oxygenation after acute stroke: a pilot study
Age Ageing, September 1, 2008; 37(5): 581 - 585.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ptjournalHome page
Q. P. Tang, Q. D. Yang, Y. H. Wu, G. Q. Wang, Z. L. Huang, Z. J. Liu, X. S. Huang, L. Zhou, P. M. Yang, and Z. Y. Fan
Effects of Problem-Oriented Willed-Movement Therapy on Motor Abilities for People With Poststroke Cognitive Deficits
Physical Therapy, October 1, 2005; 85(10): 1020 - 1033.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
A. J Turton and E. Britton
A pilot randomized controlled trial of a daily muscle stretch regime to prevent contractures in the arm after stroke
Clinical Rehabilitation, June 1, 2005; 19(6): 600 - 612.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
J. Bernhardt, H. Dewey, A. Thrift, and G. Donnan
Inactive and Alone: Physical Activity Within the First 14 Days of Acute Stroke Unit Care
Stroke, April 1, 2004; 35(4): 1005 - 1009.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
L. W. Holmqvist and L. von Koch
Environmental factors in stroke rehabilitation
BMJ, June 23, 2001; 322(7301): 1501 - 1502.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
L. von Koch, L. W. Holmqvist, A. W. Wottrich, K. Tham, and J. de Pedro-Cuesta
Rehabilitation at home after stroke: a descriptive study of an individualized intervention
Clinical Rehabilitation, June 1, 2000; 14(6): 574 - 583.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
S. Tyson and G. Turner
Discharge and follow-up for people with stroke: what happens and why
Clinical Rehabilitation, April 1, 2000; 14(4): 381 - 392.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
H. Blake and N. B Lincoln
Factors associated with strain in co-resident spouses of patients following stroke
Clinical Rehabilitation, March 1, 2000; 14(3): 307 - 314.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
G. Dowswell, J. Lawler, and J. Young
Unpacking the 'black box' of a nurse-led stroke support service
Clinical Rehabilitation, February 1, 2000; 14(2): 160 - 171.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
C Ballinger, A Ashburn, J Low, and P Roderick
Unpacking the black box of therapy - a pilot study to describe occupational therapy and physiotherapy interventions for people with stroke
Clinical Rehabilitation, April 1, 1999; 13(4): 301 - 309.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
E K Carr, F D Kenney, J Wilson-Barnett, and D J Newham
Inter-rater reliability of postural observation after stroke
Clinical Rehabilitation, March 1, 1999; 13(3): 229 - 242.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
A. Jones, E. K. Carr, D. J. Newham, and J. Wilson-Barnett
Positioning of Stroke Patients : Evaluation of a Teaching Intervention With Nurses
Stroke, August 1, 1998; 29(8): 1612 - 1617.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
S. Unit Trialists' Collaboration
How Do Stroke Units Improve Patient Outcomes? : A Collaborative Systematic Review of the Randomized Trials
Stroke, November 1, 1997; 28(11): 2139 - 2144.
[Abstract] [Full Text]