Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Stroke
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Griewing, B.
Right arrow Articles by Kessler, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Griewing, B.
Right arrow Articles by Kessler, C.

(Stroke. 1996;27:95-100.)
© 1996 American Heart Association, Inc.


Articles

Cerebrovascular Disease Assessed by Color-Flow and Power Doppler Ultrasonography

Comparison With Digital Subtraction Angiography in Internal Carotid Artery Stenosis

B. Griewing, MD; C. Morgenstern, MD; F. Driesner, MD; G. Kallwellis, MD; M.L. Walker, PhD C. Kessler, MD

From the Departments of Neurology and Neuroradiology (G.K.), Ernst Moritz Arndt University Greifswald (Germany).

Correspondence to Christof Kessler, MD, Department of Neurology, Ernst Moritz Arndt University of Greifswald, Ellernholzstrasse 1-2, D-17487 Greifswald, Germany.

Background and Purpose An understanding of carotid atherosclerosis is important to further our knowledge regarding the etiology of cerebral ischemia, and therefore it is necessary to accurately visualize carotid stenosis. The purpose of the present study was to compare different imaging techniques to determine their advantages and disadvantages in the diagnosis and quantification of middle- and high-grade internal carotid artery stenosis. In particular, we were interested in evaluating the effectiveness of the new ultrasound technique power Doppler.

Methods Fifty-four patients with greater than 50% extracranial internal carotid artery stenosis, as determined by continuous-wave Doppler, were recruited prospectively to serve as subjects. All subjects were examined with color-flow Doppler, power Doppler, and digital subtraction angiography to enable visualization of carotid stenosis and plaque surface morphology.

Results Thirty-four middle-grade stenoses (50% to 69%), 32 high-grade stenoses (70% to 99%), and 7 complete occlusions of the internal carotid artery were diagnosed with the use of digital subtraction angiography. Power Doppler visualized stenosis significantly more frequently and accurately than color-flow Doppler. Color-flow Doppler tended to overestimate and underestimate in patients with both middle- and high-grade stenosis. Power Doppler was superior to both color-flow Doppler and angiography with regard to differentiation of plaque surface morphology.

Conclusions This study demonstrates that power Doppler is an important, noninvasive imaging technique that has several advantages over color-flow Doppler in diagnosing carotid artery stenosis and visualizing plaque surface. Power Doppler, used in concert with other ultrasound techniques, should enable a more accurate detection and treatment of cerebrovascular disease.


Key Words: angiography • carotid artery disease • carotid stenosis • Doppler • ultrasonics




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
M. Reiter, R. Horvat, S. Puchner, W. Rinner, P. Polterauer, J. Lammer, E. Minar, and R.A Bucek
Plaque Imaging of the Internal Carotid Artery--Correlation of B-Flow Imaging with Histopathology
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., January 1, 2007; 28(1): 122 - 126.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
S.O. Oktar, C. Yucel, D. Karaosmanoglu, K. Akkan, H. Ozdemir, N. Tokgoz, and T. Tali
Blood-Flow Volume Quantification in Internal Carotid and Vertebral Arteries: Comparison of 3 Different Ultrasound Techniques with Phase-Contrast MR Imaging.
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., February 1, 2006; 27(2): 363 - 369.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
E. G. Grant, C. B. Benson, G. L. Moneta, A. V. Alexandrov, J. D. Baker, E. I. Bluth, B. A. Carroll, M. Eliasziw, J. Gocke, B. S. Hertzberg, et al.
Carotid Artery Stenosis: Gray-Scale and Doppler US Diagnosis--Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound Consensus Conference
Radiology, November 1, 2003; 229(2): 340 - 346.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
G. Schulte-Altedorneburg, D. W. Droste, S. Felszeghy, L. Csiba, V. Popa, K. Hegedus, J. Kollar, L. Modis, and E. B. Ringelstein
Detection of Carotid Artery Stenosis by In Vivo Duplex Ultrasound: Correlation With Planimetric Measurements of the Corresponding Postmortem Specimens
Stroke, October 1, 2002; 33(10): 2402 - 2407.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
A. Umemura and K. Yamada
B-Mode Flow Imaging of the Carotid Artery
Stroke, September 1, 2001; 32(9): 2055 - 2057.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NeurologyHome page
J. W. Norris and P. M. Rothwell
Noninvasive carotid imaging to select patients for endarterectomy: Is it really safer than conventional angiography?
Neurology, April 24, 2001; 56(8): 990 - 991.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
VASC ENDOVASCULAR SURGHome page
G. Melissano, R. Castellano, R. Zucca, and R. Chiesa
Results of Carotid Endarterectomy Performed with Preoperative Duplex Ultrasound Assessment Alone
Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, March 1, 2001; 35(2): 95 - 101.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
M. Koga, K. Kimura, K. Minematsu, and T. Yamaguchi
Diagnosis of Internal Carotid Artery Stenosis Greater than 70% with Power Doppler Duplex Sonography
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., February 1, 2001; 22(2): 413 - 417.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
M. Claudon, D. Winninger, S. Briançon, and P. Pesque
Power Doppler US: Evaluation of the Morphology of Stenoses with a Flow Phantom
Radiology, January 1, 2001; 218(1): 109 - 117.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
StrokeHome page
P. M. Rothwell, S. T. Pendlebury, J. Wardlaw, and C. P. Warlow
Critical Appraisal of the Design and Reporting of Studies of Imaging and Measurement of Carotid Stenosis
Stroke, June 1, 2000; 31(6): 1444 - 1450.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Diagnostic Medical SonographyHome page
G. S. Lin, D. T. Milburn, and S. Briggs
Power Doppler: How It Works, Its Clinical Benefits, and Recent Technologic Advances
Journal of Diagnostic Medical Sonography, July 1, 1998; 14(4): 151 - 161.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
W. Steinke, S. Ries, N. Artemis, A. Schwartz, and M. Hennerici
Power Doppler Imaging of Carotid Artery Stenosis : Comparison With Color Doppler Flow Imaging and Angiography
Stroke, October 1, 1997; 28(10): 1981 - 1987.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
StrokeHome page
N. Suwanwela, U. Can, K. L. Furie, J. F. Southern, N. R. Macdonald, C. S. Ogilvy, C. J. Hansen, F. S. Buonanno, W. M. Abbott, W. J. Koroshetz, et al.
Carotid Doppler Ultrasound Criteria for Internal Carotid Artery Stenosis Based on Residual Lumen Diameter Calculated From En Bloc Carotid Endarterectomy Specimens
Stroke, November 1, 1996; 27(11): 1965 - 1969.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
S. M. El-Saden, E. G. Grant, G. M. Hathout, P. T. Zimmerman, S. N. Cohen, and J. D. Baker
Imaging of the Internal Carotid Artery: The Dilemma of Total versus Near Total Occlusion
Radiology, November 1, 2001; 221(2): 301 - 308.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]