(Stroke. 1996;27:683-686.)
© 1996 American Heart Association, Inc.
Articles |
A Novel Technique for Identification of Doppler Microembolic Signals Based on the Coincidence Method
In Vitro and In Vivo Evaluation
From the Department of Neurology, University of Münster, and the Technical University of Cologne (J.G.) (Germany).
Correspondence to D. Georgiadis, MD, Department of Neurology, Martin-Luther-University, Ernst-Grube Str 40, 06097 Halle, Germany.
Background and Purpose The applicability of a novel differentiation technique in embolus detection based on the coincidence principle and using a multigate probe was evaluated in this study.
Methods According to the coincidence method, high-intensity transients should only be classified as microembolic signals if they appear sequentially in the two sample volumes monitored and within a defined time window calculated from the blood velocity and the spatial distance between the insonation depths. Part A: microbubbles were introduced in a continuous-flow bench model of the middle cerebral artery to evaluate the accuracy of the multigate probe in embolus detection. Part B: in the subjects and patients, the minimal and maximum time delays in the appearance of microembolic signals in the two middle cerebral artery sample volumes were calculated as 0.01 second and set at 0.1 second, respectively. The multigate probe was used to monitor (1) 5 normal volunteers in whom 1008 artifact signals were produced, (2) 2 patients undergoing aortic valve replacement surgery, and (3) 12 patients with potential cardiac or carotid embolic sources.
Results In the bench model, 95.5% of microembolic signals produced by microbubbles appeared in the two sample volumes with a time delay between 0.02 and 0.05 second, while in the remaining 4.5% a shorter passage time of 0.01 second was measured. A total of 1968 high-intensity signals were recorded in subjects and patients. All but 20 of these (99%) appeared in both monitoring channels within the above time frame. To summarize, 996 (98.8%) of the 1004 artifact signals and 943 (98.1%) of the 961 microembolic signals were correctly classified.
Conclusions Application of the coincidence theory to distinguish microembolic signals from artifacts provides a promising new technique with high sensitivity and specificity that could decisively improve the validity of embolus detection.
Key Words: diagnostic imaging • Doppler • embolism
This article has been cited by other articles:
 |
|
 |
|
  D. G. Nabavi, J. Stockmann, C. Schmid, M. Schneider, D. Hammel, H. H. Scheld, and E. B. Ringelstein Doppler microembolic load predicts risk of thromboembolic complications in Novacor patients J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., July 1, 2003; 126(1): 160 - 167. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 R. L. Taylor, M. A. Borger, R. D. Weisel, L. Fedorko, and C. M. Feindel Cerebral microemboli during cardiopulmonary bypass: increased emboli during perfusionist interventions Ann. Thorac. Surg., July 1, 1999; 68(1): 89 - 93. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 R. Lagos, F. M. Cabezas, and G. Deklunder Microemboli in Cerebral Circulation and Alteration of Cognitive Abilities in Patients With Mechanical Prosthetic Heart Valves • Response Stroke, May 1, 1999; 30(5): 1150 - 1150. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
V. Kemeny, D. W. Droste, S. Hermes, D. G. Nabavi, G. Schulte-Altedorneburg, M. Siebler, and E. B. Ringelstein Automatic Embolus Detection by a Neural Network Stroke, April 1, 1999; 30(4): 807 - 810. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. Furui, K. Hanzawa, H. Ohzeki, T. Nakajima, N. Fukuhara, M. Takamori, J.P. Mohr, and C. Stapf "Tail Sign" Associated With Microembolic Signals • Editorial Comment Stroke, April 1, 1999; 30(4): 863 - 866. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
F. Ries, K. Tiemann, C. Pohl, C. Bauer, M. Mundo, and H. Becher High-Resolution Emboli Detection and Differentiation by Characteristic Postembolic Spectral Patterns Stroke, March 1, 1998; 29(3): 668 - 672. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. Bernd Ringelstein, D. W. Droste, V. L. Babikian, D. H. Evans, D. G. Grosset, M. Kaps, H. S. Markus, D. Russell, and M. Siebler Consensus on Microembolus Detection by TCD Stroke, March 1, 1998; 29(3): 725 - 729. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. Georgiadis, A. Wenzel, H. R. Zerkowski, S. Zierz, and A. Lindner Automated Intraoperative Detection of Doppler Microembolic Signals Using the Bigate Approach Stroke, January 1, 1998; 29(1): 137 - 139. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
U. Sliwka, C. Klotzsch, O. Popescu, K. Brandt, P. Schmidt, P. Berlit, and J. Noth Do Chronic Middle Cerebral Artery Stenoses Represent an Embolic Focus? : A Multirange Transcranial Doppler Study Stroke, July 1, 1997; 28(7): 1324 - 1327. [Abstract] [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. S. Markus and J. Molloy Use of a Decibel Threshold in Detecting Doppler Embolic Signals Stroke, April 1, 1997; 28(4): 692 - 695. [Abstract] [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. W. Droste, G. Hagedorn, A. Notzold, H.-J. Siemens, H. H. Sievers, and M. Kaps Bigated Transcranial Doppler for the Detection of Clinically Silent Circulating Emboli in Normal Persons and Patients With Prosthetic Cardiac Valves Stroke, March 1, 1997; 28(3): 588 - 592. [Abstract] [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
|
|
U. Sliwka, A. Lingnau, W.-D. Stohlmann, P. Schmidt, M. Mull, R. R. Diehl, and J. Noth Prevalence and Time Course of Microembolic Signals in Patients With Acute Stroke: A Prospective Study Stroke, February 1, 1997; 28(2): 358 - 363. [Abstract] [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Molloy and H. S. Markus Multigated Doppler Ultrasound in the Detection of Emboli in a Flow Model and Embolic Signals in Patients Stroke, September 1, 1996; 27(9): 1548 - 1552. [Abstract] [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. G. Nabavi, D. Georgiadis, T. Mumme, P. Zunker, and E. B. Ringelstein Detection of Microembolic Signals in Patients With Middle Cerebral Artery Stenosis by Means of a Bigate Probe: A Pilot Study Stroke, August 1, 1996; 27(8): 1347 - 1349. [Abstract] [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D.G. Nabavi, D. Georgiadis, T. Mumme, C. Schmid, T.G. Mackay, H.H. Scheld, and E.B. Ringelstein Clinical Relevance of Intracranial Microembolic Signals in Patients With Left Ventricular Assist Devices : A Prospective Study Stroke, May 1, 1996; 27(5): 891 - 896. [Abstract] [Full Text]
|
|