This Article Full Text Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Hademenos, G. J. Articles by Massoud, T. F. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Hademenos, G. J. Articles by Massoud, T. F.

(Stroke. 1996;27:1072-1083.)
© 1996 American Heart Association, Inc.

Articles

Risk of Intracranial Arteriovenous Malformation Rupture Due to Venous Drainage Impairment

A Theoretical Analysis

George J. Hademenos, PhD Tarik F. Massoud, MD

From the Endovascular Therapy Service, Department of Radiological Sciences, University of California at Los Angeles School of Medicine.

Background and Purpose Increased resistance in the venous drainage of intracranial arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) may contribute to their increased risk of hemorrhage. Venous drainage impairment may result from naturally occurring stenoses/occlusions, or if draining veins (DVs) undergo occlusion before feeding arteries during surgical removal, or after surgery in the presence of "occlusive hyperemia." We employed a detailed biomathematical AVM model using electrical network analysis to investigate theoretically the hemodynamic consequences and the risk of AVM rupture due to venous drainage impairment.

Methods The AVM model consisted of a noncompartmentalized nidus with 28 vessels (24 plexiform components and 4 fistulous components), 4 arterial feeders, and 2 DVs. An expression for the risk of AVM nidus rupture was derived on the basis of functional distribution of the critical radii of component vessels. Risk was calculated from biomathematical simulations of volumetric flow rate with both DVs patent and for four stages of venous drainage obstruction: (1) 25%, (2) 50%, (3) 75%, and (4) 100%. Each stage of occlusion was applied to each DV while the other DV was patent and then to the patent DV while the other DV was totally occluded.

Results For flow through the AVM when both DVs were unobstructed, the baseline risk of AVM nidus rupture ranged from 4.4% to 91.2%. Theoretical rupture occurred in nidus components proximal to the DVs when the risk exceeded 100%, as was observed with the obstruction of DV1 and a patent DV2. The ranges for risk of rupture across the nidus for the four stages were (1) 4.7% to 90.5%, (2) 5.9% to 86.9%, (3) 0% to 98.4%, and (4) 0% to 106.3%, respectively. Rupture was observed for an 86% occlusion of DV1 (ie, the DV fed by the intranidal fistula) and DV2 patent, primarily because of the dramatic shift in the hemodynamic burden toward the weaker plexiform nidus vessels.

Conclusions On theoretical grounds, venous drainage impairment was predictive of AVM nidus rupture and was strongly dependent on AVM morphology (presence of intranidal fistulas and their spatial relation to DVs) and hemodynamics. Specifically, stenosis/occlusion of a high-flow DV induces a rapid redistribution of blood into the weak plexiform vessels of the opposing region of the nidus, causing a hemodynamic overload and an increased risk of rupture. These findings should be carefully considered among all factors affecting the natural history of intracranial AVMs and the mechanisms implicated in their spontaneous rupture. They may also provide a theoretical rationale for some of the hemorrhagic complications that occur during and after surgical treatment.

Key Words: cerebral arteriovenous malformations • cerebral hemorrhage • hemodynamics • models, theoretical

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. Cronqvist, R. Wirestam, B. Ramgren, L. Brandt, B. Romner, O. Nilsson, H. Saveland, S. Holtas, and E.-M. Larsson Endovascular Treatment of Intracerebral Arteriovenous Malformations: Procedural Safety, Complications, and Results Evaluated by MR Imaging, Including Diffusion and Perfusion Imaging AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., January 1, 2006; 27(1): 162 - 176. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Todaka, J.-i. Hamada, Y. Kai, M. Morioka, and Y. Ushio Analysis of Mean Transit Time of Contrast Medium in Ruptured and Unruptured Arteriovenous Malformations: A Digital Subtraction Angiographic Study Stroke, October 1, 2003; 34(10): 2410 - 2414. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. A. Stefani, P. J. Porter, K. G. terBrugge, W. Montanera, R. A. Willinsky, and M. C. Wallace Large and Deep Brain Arteriovenous Malformations Are Associated With Risk of Future Hemorrhage Stroke, May 1, 2002; 33(5): 1220 - 1224. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. A. Stefani, P. J. Porter, K. G. terBrugge, W. Montanera, R. A. Willinsky, and M. C. Wallace Angioarchitectural Factors Present in Brain Arteriovenous Malformations Associated With Hemorrhagic Presentation Stroke, April 1, 2002; 33(4): 920 - 924. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Al-Shahi and C. Warlow A systematic review of the frequency and prognosis of arteriovenous malformations of the brain in adults Brain, October 1, 2001; 124(10): 1900 - 1926. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. F. Massoud, G. J. Hademenos, A. A.F. De Salles, T. D. Solberg, and K. D. Kim Experimental Radiosurgery Simulations Using a Theoretical Model of Cerebral Arteriovenous Malformations Editorial Comment Stroke, October 1, 2000; 31(10): 2466 - 2477. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. F. Massoud, G. J. Hademenos, W. L. Young, E. Gao, and J. Pile-Spellman Can Induction of Systemic Hypotension Help Prevent Nidus Rupture Complicating Arteriovenous Malformation Embolization?: Analysis of Underlying Mechanisms Achieved Using a Theoretical Model AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., July 1, 2000; 21(7): 1255 - 1267. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. J. Hademenos and T. F. Massoud Biophysical Mechanisms of Stroke Stroke, October 1, 1997; 28(10): 2067 - 2077. [Abstract] [Full Text]