Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Stroke
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Stroke. 1996;27:1249-1252

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Markus, H.
Right arrow Articles by Siebler, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Markus, H.
Right arrow Articles by Siebler, M.

(Stroke. 1996;27:1249-1252.)
© 1996 American Heart Association, Inc.


Articles

How Good Is Intercenter Agreement in the Identification of Embolic Signals in Carotid Artery Disease?

Hugh Markus, DM; J. Martin Bland, PhD; Georg Rose, PhD; Matthias Sitzer, MD Mario Siebler, MD

the Department of Neurology, King's College School of Medicine and Dentistry (H.M.), London, UK; Department of Public Health and Medicine, St George's Hospital Medical School (M.B.), London, UK; and Department of Neurology, University of Dusseldorf (G.R., M. Sitzer, M. Siebler), Germany.

Correspondence to Dr Hugh Markus, Department of Neurology, Institute of Psychiatry, De Crespigny Park, London SE5 8AF, UK.

Background and Purpose There has been concern regarding the reproducibility of the detection of embolic signals, particularly in patients with carotid artery stenosis in whom the signals are of low intensity. No published studies have examined intercenter agreement in reporting specific embolic signals or the factors responsible for any lack of agreement. We examined reproducibility between two centers in which widely differing proportions of embolic signals have previously been reported in patients with carotid artery stenosis.

Methods Recordings from the middle cerebral artery of eight patients with ipsilateral carotid artery stenosis in whom embolic signals had been detected during a previous study were independently examined by three experienced observers in one center and by one experienced observer in another center. We calculated agreement within and between centers by estimating the probability that one observer would identify a specific embolic signal if other observers had identified it (a probability of 1 indicates complete agreement). The influence of different characteristics of the embolic signal on the probability of its detection as an embolic signal was determined.

Results A high level of agreement in the identification of specific embolic signals was found. This was similar between all observers (.90), between the three observers in one center (.89), and between observers in the two different centers (.94). The probability of detection was independently related to the relative intensity of the embolic signal (P<.0001). It was less (although significantly) independently related to the posi-tion of the embolic signal in the cardiac cycle (P=.02), with signals in systole being more reliably detected. There was no independent relationship between the probability of detection and either the duration of the embolic signal or the velocity at the maximum intensity increase. The use of threshold intensity as a criterion for embolic signal detection increased inter-observer agreement but reduced the sensitivity in detecting signals.

Conclusions The high level of interobserver agreement suggests that the technique is sufficiently reproducible for clinical use.


Key Words: carotid artery diseases • cerebral embolism • ultrasonics




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
NeurologyHome page
R. M. Kwee, R. J. van Oostenbrugge, L. Hofstra, G. J. Teule, J.M.A. van Engelshoven, W. H. Mess, and M. E. Kooi
Identifying vulnerable carotid plaques by noninvasive imaging
Neurology, June 10, 2008; 70(24_Part_2): 2401 - 2409.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
R. Dittrich, M. A. Ritter, M. Kaps, M. Siebler, K. Lees, V. Larrue, D. G. Nabavi, E. B. Ringelstein, H. S. Markus, and D. W. Droste
The Use of Embolic Signal Detection in Multicenter Trials to Evaluate Antiplatelet Efficacy: Signal Analysis and Quality Control Mechanisms in the CARESS (Clopidogrel and Aspirin for Reduction of Emboli in Symptomatic carotid Stenosis) Trial
Stroke, April 1, 2006; 37(4): 1065 - 1069.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
A. D. Mackinnon, R. Aaslid, and H. S. Markus
Ambulatory Transcranial Doppler Cerebral Embolic Signal Detection in Symptomatic and Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis
Stroke, August 1, 2005; 36(8): 1726 - 1730.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
H. S. Markus, D. W. Droste, M. Kaps, V. Larrue, K. R. Lees, M. Siebler, and E. B. Ringelstein
Dual Antiplatelet Therapy With Clopidogrel and Aspirin in Symptomatic Carotid Stenosis Evaluated Using Doppler Embolic Signal Detection: The Clopidogrel and Aspirin for Reduction of Emboli in Symptomatic Carotid Stenosis (CARESS) Trial
Circulation, May 3, 2005; 111(17): 2233 - 2240.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
S. N. Meydani, L. S. Leka, B. C. Fine, G. E. Dallal, G. T. Keusch, M. F. Singh, and D. H. Hamer
Vitamin E and Respiratory Tract Infections in Elderly Nursing Home Residents: A Randomized Controlled Trial
JAMA, August 18, 2004; 292(7): 828 - 836.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
G. R. de Oliveira Filho and L. Schonhorst
The Development and Application of an Instrument for Assessing Resident Competence During Preanesthesia Consultation
Anesth. Analg., July 1, 2004; 99(1): 62 - 69.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
A. D. Mackinnon, R. Aaslid, and H. S. Markus
Long-Term Ambulatory Monitoring for Cerebral Emboli Using Transcranial Doppler Ultrasound
Stroke, January 1, 2004; 35(1): 73 - 78.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
Z. Kaposzta, A. Clifton, J. Molloy, J. F. Martin, and H. S. Markus
S-Nitrosoglutathione Reduces Asymptomatic Embolization After Carotid Angioplasty
Circulation, December 10, 2002; 106(24): 3057 - 3062.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
Z. Kaposzta, P. A. Baskerville, D. Madge, S. Fraser, J. F. Martin, and H. S. Markus
L-Arginine and S-Nitrosoglutathione Reduce Embolization in Humans
Circulation, May 15, 2001; 103(19): 2371 - 2375.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
M. Cullinane, G. Reid, R. Dittrich, Z. Kaposzta, R. Ackerstaff, V. Babikian, D. W. Droste, D. Grossett, M. Siebler, L. Valton, et al.
Evaluation of New Online Automated Embolic Signal Detection Algorithm, Including Comparison With Panel of International Experts
Stroke, June 1, 2000; 31(6): 1335 - 1341.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
M. Muller, W. Reiche, P. Langenscheidt, J. Ha{beta}feld, and T. Hagen
Ischemia after Carotid Endarterectomy: Comparison between Transcranial Doppler Sonography and Diffusion-Weighted MR Imaging
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., January 1, 2000; 21(1): 47 - 54.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
Z. Kaposzta, E. Young, P. M. W. Bath, and H. S. Markus
Clinical Application of Asymptomatic Embolic Signal Detection in Acute Stroke : A Prospective Study
Stroke, September 1, 1999; 30(9): 1814 - 1818.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
V. Kemeny, D. W. Droste, S. Hermes, D. G. Nabavi, G. Schulte-Altedorneburg, M. Siebler, and E. B. Ringelstein
Automatic Embolus Detection by a Neural Network
Stroke, April 1, 1999; 30(4): 807 - 810.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
M. Cullinane, R. Wainwright, A. Brown, M. Monaghan, and H. S. Markus
Asymptomatic Embolization in Subjects With Atrial Fibrillation Not Taking Anticoagulants : A Prospective Study
Stroke, September 1, 1998; 29(9): 1810 - 1815.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
E. Bernd Ringelstein, D. W. Droste, V. L. Babikian, D. H. Evans, D. G. Grosset, M. Kaps, H. S. Markus, D. Russell, and M. Siebler
Consensus on Microembolus Detection by TCD
Stroke, March 1, 1998; 29(3): 725 - 729.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
LupusHome page
C. Specker, A. Perniok, U. Brauckmann, M. Siebler, and M. Schneider
Review : Detection of cerebral microemboli in APS-- Introducing a novel investigation method and implications of analogies with carotid artery disease
Lupus, January 1, 1998; 7(2_suppl): S75 - S80.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
H. S. Markus, R. Ackerstaff, V. Babikian, C. Bladin, D. Droste, D. Grosset, C. Levi, D. Russell, M. Siebler, and C. Tegeler
Intercenter Agreement in Reading Doppler Embolic Signals : A Multicenter International Study
Stroke, July 1, 1997; 28(7): 1307 - 1310.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
StrokeHome page
H. S. Markus and J. Molloy
Use of a Decibel Threshold in Detecting Doppler Embolic Signals
Stroke, April 1, 1997; 28(4): 692 - 695.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
LupusHome page
C. Specker, J. Rademacher, D. Sohngen, M. Sitzer, I. Janda, M. Siebler, H. Steinmetz, and M. Schneider
Cerebral microemboli in patients with antiphospholipid syndrome
Lupus, January 1, 1997; 6(8): 638 - 644.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
Z. Kaposzta, J. F. Martin, and H. S. Markus
Switching off Embolization From Symptomatic Carotid Plaque Using S-Nitrosoglutathione
Circulation, March 26, 2002; 105(12): 1480 - 1484.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]