(Stroke. 1996;27:1347-1349.)
© 1996 American Heart Association, Inc.
Articles |
the Department of Neurology, University of Munster (Germany).
Correspondence to Darius G. Nabavi, MD, Department of Neurology, University of Munster, Albert-Schweitzer-Straße 33, 48129 Munster, Germany.
Background and Purpose Middle cerebral artery (MCA) stenosis is a relatively rare occlusive disease with an annual stroke risk of approximately 7% to 8%. However, the frequent coincidence of cardiac or ipsilateral carotid artery disease may lead to difficulties in identifying the relevant embolizing source in symptomatic patients. We undertook this study to evaluate the prevalence of microembolic signals (MES) as well as the potential and limitations of bigate monitoring in patients with MCA stenosis.
Methods Fourteen patients aged 33 to 87 years with angiographically demonstrated symptomatic (acute, n=2; chronic, n=8) or asymptomatic (n=4) MCA stenosis were examined. Six patients (43%) had additional cardiac (n=3) or carotid artery (n=3) disease. By means of a bigate probe, simultaneous insonation of prestenotic and poststenotic vessel segments was attempted.
Results In 10 patients (71%), MES detection could be performed sufficiently at target vessel sites. In the remaining patients, either prestenotic (n=3) or poststenotic (n=1) monitoring was not satisfactory due to insufficient transtemporal bone window or the great length or extent of MCA stenosis. Poststenotic MES were detectable in 2 acutely symptomatic and 1 asymptomatic patient (prevalence, 21%). In the latter case, the sequential appearance of MES in both prestenotic and poststenotic channels excluded MCA stenosis but strongly favored coexisting carotid artery stenosis as the active embolic source.
Conclusions MES are detectable in patients with MCA stenosis. Bigate monitoring in this setting is feasible and allows identification of the active source among "competing" embolizing conditions.
Key Words: cerebral embolism middle cerebral artery stenosis ultrasonics
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. Gao, K. S. Wong, T. Hansberg, W. W. M. Lam, D. W. Droste, and E. B. Ringelstein Microembolic Signal Predicts Recurrent Cerebral Ischemic Events in Acute Stroke Patients With Middle Cerebral Artery Stenosis Stroke, December 1, 2004; 35(12): 2832 - 2836. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C Kremer, T Schaettin, D Georgiadis, and R W Baumgartner Prognosis of asymptomatic stenosis of the middle cerebral artery J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, September 1, 2004; 75(9): 1300 - 1303. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Segura, J. Serena, M. Castellanos, J. Teruel, C. Vilar, and A. Davalos Embolism in acute middle cerebral artery stenosis Neurology, February 27, 2001; 56(4): 497 - 501. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Segura, J. Serena, A. Molins, and A. Davalos Clusters of Microembolic Signals: A New Form of Cerebral Microembolism Presentation in a Patient With Middle Cerebral Artery Stenosis Stroke, March 1, 1998; 29(3): 722 - 724. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
U. Sliwka, C. Klotzsch, O. Popescu, K. Brandt, P. Schmidt, P. Berlit, and J. Noth Do Chronic Middle Cerebral Artery Stenoses Represent an Embolic Focus? : A Multirange Transcranial Doppler Study Stroke, July 1, 1997; 28(7): 1324 - 1327. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
P. A. Lyrer, S. Engelter, E. W. Radu, and A. J. Steck Cerebral Infarcts Related to Isolated Middle Cerebral Artery Stenosis Stroke, May 1, 1997; 28(5): 1022 - 1027. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
D. W. Droste, G. Hagedorn, A. Notzold, H.-J. Siemens, H. H. Sievers, and M. Kaps Bigated Transcranial Doppler for the Detection of Clinically Silent Circulating Emboli in Normal Persons and Patients With Prosthetic Cardiac Valves Stroke, March 1, 1997; 28(3): 588 - 592. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
|
Stroke Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 1996 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |