This Article Full Text Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Steinke, W. Articles by Hennerici, M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Steinke, W. Articles by Hennerici, M. Pubmed/NCBI databases Medline Plus Health Information Ultrasound

(Stroke. 1997;28:1981-1987.)
© 1997 American Heart Association, Inc.

Articles

Power Doppler Imaging of Carotid Artery Stenosis

Comparison With Color Doppler Flow Imaging and Angiography

W. Steinke, MD; S. Ries, MD; N. Artemis, MD; A. Schwartz, MD; M. Hennerici, MD

From the Department of Neurology, Klinikum Mannheim, University of Heidelberg (Germany). Dr Artemis was a visiting fellow from the Department of Neurology, AHEPA Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece.

Correspondence to PD Dr W. Steinke, Department of Neurology, Marien-Hospital Düsseldorf, Rochusstr 2, 40479 Düsseldorf, Germany.

Background and Purpose Power Doppler imaging (PDI) is a new sonographic technique that has recently been introduced for vascular application. Since the technical principles of PDI may provide increased sensitivity to visualize the continuity of blood flow in arterial stenoses, we investigated the diagnostic significance of PDI and the intermethod relationship for the measurement and classification of internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis in comparison with both color Doppler flow imaging (CDFI) and angiography.

Methods One hundred patients with a total of 128 ICA stenoses (50% to 69%, n=37; 70% to 79%, n=27; 80% to 99%, n=64) and 12 ICA occlusions were consecutively investigated by means of PDI, CDFI, and intra-arterial angiography (n=48). Reduction of the intrastenotic lumen was measured on longitudinal and transverse views of PDI and CDFI for the calculation of the degree of diameter and area stenosis, respectively. Angiographic stenosis was determined with the use of the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET), European Carotid Surgery Trial (ECST), and common carotid (CC) methods.

Results PDI provided significantly more excellent or good (92% versus 79%; P<.01) displays of the intrastenotic lumen than CDFI, particularly in complicated high-grade stenosis. While linear regression analysis demonstrated a high overall correlation between PDI and CDFI for diameter (r=.88; P<.001) and area stenosis (r=.79; P<.001), categorization of ICA stenosis revealed best agreement for 80% to 99% area stenoses. Since angiography frequently either underclassified (NASCET method) or overclassified (ECST, CC methods) the degree of ICA stenosis in comparison to both PDI and CDFI, the sonographic-angiographic correlation was only moderate (regression coefficients ranged from .62 to .70; P<.001).

Conclusions PDI further improves the assessment of ICA stenosis by providing better visualization of the stenotic vascular lumen than CDFI. Sonographic imaging of the stenotic plaque on both PDI and CDFI provided a direct measurement of the local degree of stenosis, while the angiographic grade of stenosis essentially depended on the method used for evaluation.

Key Words: angiography • carotid artery diseases • ultrasonics

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. Kamouchi, K. Kishikawa, Y. Okada, T. Inoue, S. Ibayashi, and M. Iida Reappraisal of Flow Velocity Ratio in Common Carotid Artery to Predict Hemodynamic Change in Carotid Stenosis AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., April 1, 2005; 26(4): 957 - 962. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. H. Wierks and N. Labropoulos Noninvasive Carotid Imaging Perspectives in Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, June 1, 2004; 16(2): 89 - 99. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. A. Bucek, M. Reiter, A. Dirisamer, M. Haumer, A. Fritz, E. Minar, and J. Lammer Three-Dimensional Color Doppler Sonography in Carotid Artery Stenosis AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., August 1, 2003; 24(7): 1294 - 1299. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. J. Nederkoorn, Y. van der Graaf, and M.G. M. Hunink Duplex Ultrasound and Magnetic Resonance Angiography Compared With Digital Subtraction Angiography in Carotid Artery Stenosis: A Systematic Review Stroke, May 1, 2003; 34(5): 1324 - 1331. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. M. Romero, M. H. Lev, S.-T. Chan, M. M. Connelly, R. C. Curiel, A. E. Jackson, R. G. Gonzalez, and R. H. Ackerman US of Neurovascular Occlusive Disease: Interpretive Pearls and Pitfalls RadioGraphics, September 1, 2002; 22(5): 1165 - 1176. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Umemura and K. Yamada B-Mode Flow Imaging of the Carotid Artery Stroke, September 1, 2001; 32(9): 2055 - 2057. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Szabo, R. Kern, A. Gass, J. Hirsch, and M. Hennerici Acute Stroke Patterns in Patients With Internal Carotid Artery Disease : A Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study Stroke, June 1, 2001; 32(6): 1323 - 1329. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Koga, K. Kimura, K. Minematsu, and T. Yamaguchi Diagnosis of Internal Carotid Artery Stenosis Greater than 70% with Power Doppler Duplex Sonography AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., February 1, 2001; 22(2): 413 - 417. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. B. Anderson, R. Ashforth, D. E. Steinke, R. Ferdinandy, and J. M. Findlay CT Angiography for the Detection and Characterization of Carotid Artery Bifurcation Disease Stroke, September 1, 2000; 31(9): 2168 - 2174. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. Devuyst, N. Cals, V. de Borchgrave, P. Bara, and M. Vandooren Advantages of Transcranial Power Duplex Imaging After Contrast Injection to Detect Low Flow in a Moyamoya Syndrome Stroke, April 1, 1999; 30(4): 897 - 899. [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Arning, W. Steinke, M. Hennerici, S. Ries, A. Schwartz, and N. Artemis Evaluation of Carotid Artery Stenosis by Power Doppler Imaging • Response Stroke, October 1, 1998; 29(10): 2211 - 2213. [Full Text] [PDF]