This Article Full Text Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Alexandrov, A. V. Articles by Burns, P. N. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Alexandrov, A. V. Articles by Burns, P. N.

(Stroke. 1997;28:339-342.)
© 1997 American Heart Association, Inc.

Articles

Correlation of Peak Systolic Velocity and Angiographic Measurement of Carotid Stenosis Revisited

Andrei V. Alexandrov, MD; Dianne S. Brodie, RVT; Arline McLean, MD; Paul Hamilton, MD; John Murphy, MD Peter N. Burns, PhD

the Neurovascular Doppler Laboratory (A.V.A., D.S.B., A.M., P.H.) and the Departments of Neurology (A.V.A., A.M.), Radiology (P.H., J.M.), and Imaging Research (P.N.B.), Sunnybrook Health Science Center, University of Toronto, Canada.

Correspondence to Dr Andrei V. Alexandrov, Stroke Treatment Team, Department of Neurology, The University of Texas–Houston Medical School, 6431 Fannin St, MSB 7.044, Houston, TX 77030. E-mail avalexandrov@worldnet.att.net.

Background and Purpose Recent observations from the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET) questioned the reliability of peak systolic velocity (PSV) criteria for grading carotid stenosis. We compared PSV and angiographic measurements at our center together with known physiological relationships to investigate the accuracy of ultrasound.

Methods Consecutive patients who underwent both color-coded duplex ultrasound and intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography were studied. PSV was determined with angle correction at the site of the tightest internal carotid artery narrowing. Carotid stenosis was measured on angiograms with the North American (N) and common carotid (C) methods. Variables for the stepwise multiple linear regression analysis were selected from an axisymmetrical flow model.

Results Eighty bifurcations were imaged in 40 patients. PSV did not exceed 140 cm/s in normal vessels. In diseased arteries, PSV increased proportionally with increasing stenosis and decreased to 0 cm/s at occlusion. In stepwise selection of polynomial terms, the linear, quadratic, and cubic correlations of .38, .17, and .22 for N and .45, .24, and .03 for C were found to be significant (P<.02). When only stenosed vessels were evaluated, PSV increase was found with greater scatter for the N measurement: r²=.73 for N and r²=.85 for C (n=50; P=.03 for the difference between two correlated correlation coefficients).

Conclusions At our laboratory PSV consistently correlates well with N and C angiographic measurements, as determined with a simple flow model. The complex nature of these correlations and greater variability of the N measurement should be taken into account when data from different centers are compared.

Key Words: angiography • carotid stenosis • ultrasonics

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R. E. Latchaw, M. J. Alberts, M. H. Lev, J. J. Connors, R. E. Harbaugh, R. T. Higashida, R. Hobson, C. S. Kidwell, W. J. Koroshetz, V. Mathews, et al. Recommendations for Imaging of Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association Stroke, November 1, 2009; 40(11): 3646 - 3678. [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Setacci, E. Chisci, F. Setacci, F. Iacoponi, and G. de Donato Grading Carotid Intrastent Restenosis: A 6-Year Follow-Up Study Stroke, April 1, 2008; 39(4): 1189 - 1196. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. M.A. Box, J. van der Grond, A. J.M. de Craen, I. H. Palm-Meinders, R. J. van der Geest, J. W. Jukema, J. H.C. Reiber, M. A. van Buchem, G. J. Blauw, and for the PROSPER Study Group Pravastatin Decreases Wall Shear Stress and Blood Velocity in the Internal Carotid Artery Without Affecting Flow Volume: Results From the PROSPER MRI Study Stroke, April 1, 2007; 38(4): 1374 - 1376. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. Gaitini and M. Soudack Diagnosing Carotid Stenosis by Doppler Sonography: State of the Art J. Ultrasound Med., August 1, 2005; 24(8): 1127 - 1136. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Kamouchi, K. Kishikawa, Y. Okada, T. Inoue, S. Ibayashi, and M. Iida Reappraisal of Flow Velocity Ratio in Common Carotid Artery to Predict Hemodynamic Change in Carotid Stenosis AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., April 1, 2005; 26(4): 957 - 962. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Wessels, J. U. Harrer, S. Stetter, M. Mull, and C. Klotzsch Three-Dimensional Assessment of Extracranial Doppler Sonography in Carotid Artery Stenosis Compared With Digital Subtraction Angiography Stroke, August 1, 2004; 35(8): 1847 - 1851. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Nonent, J.-M. Serfaty, N. Nighoghossian, F. Rouhart, L. Derex, C. Rotaru, P. Chirossel, B. Guias, J.-F. Heautot, P. Gouny, et al. Concordance Rate Differences of 3 Noninvasive Imaging Techniques to Measure Carotid Stenosis in Clinical Routine Practice: Results of the CARMEDAS Multicenter Study Stroke, March 1, 2004; 35(3): 682 - 686. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. G. Grant, C. B. Benson, G. L. Moneta, A. V. Alexandrov, J. D. Baker, E. I. Bluth, B. A. Carroll, M. Eliasziw, J. Gocke, B. S. Hertzberg, et al. Carotid Artery Stenosis: Gray-Scale and Doppler US Diagnosis--Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound Consensus Conference Radiology, November 1, 2003; 229(2): 340 - 346. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. W. Norris, F. Morriello, D. W. Rowed, and R. Maggisano Vascular Imaging Before Carotid Endarterectomy Stroke, May 1, 2003; 34 (5): e16 - e16. [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. J. Nederkoorn, Y. van der Graaf, and M.G. M. Hunink Duplex Ultrasound and Magnetic Resonance Angiography Compared With Digital Subtraction Angiography in Carotid Artery Stenosis: A Systematic Review Stroke, May 1, 2003; 34(5): 1324 - 1331. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Z. G. Nadareishvili, P. M. Rothwell, V. Beletsky, A. Pagniello, and J. W. Norris Long-term Risk of Stroke and Other Vascular Events in Patients With Asymptomatic Carotid Artery Stenosis Arch Neurol, July 1, 2002; 59(7): 1162 - 1166. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Todo, M. Watanabe, R. Fukunaga, K. Araki, S. Yamamoto, M. Rai, T. Hoshi, M. Nukata, A. Taguchi, and N. Kinoshita Imaging of Distal Internal Carotid Artery by Ultrasonography With a 3.5-MHz Convex Probe Stroke, July 1, 2002; 33(7): 1792 - 1794. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. W. Norris and P. M. Rothwell Noninvasive carotid imaging to select patients for endarterectomy: Is it really safer than conventional angiography? Neurology, April 24, 2001; 56(8): 990 - 991. [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. Melissano, R. Castellano, R. Zucca, and R. Chiesa Results of Carotid Endarterectomy Performed with Preoperative Duplex Ultrasound Assessment Alone Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, March 1, 2001; 35(2): 95 - 101. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. D. Henderson, D. A. Steinman, M. Eliasziw, and H. J. M. Barnett Effect of Contralateral Carotid Artery Stenosis on Carotid Ultrasound Velocity Measurements Stroke, November 1, 2000; 31(11): 2636 - 2640. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				O. E. H. Elgersma, A. F. J. Wüst, P. C. Buijs, Y. van der Graaf, B. C. Eikelboom, and W. P. T. M. Mali Multidirectional Depiction of Internal Carotid Arterial Stenosis: Three-dimensional Time-of-Flight MR Angiography versus Rotational and Conventional Digital Subtraction Angiography Radiology, August 1, 2000; 216(2): 511 - 516. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				O. E. H. Elgersma, P. C. Buijs, A. F. J. Wüst, Y. van der Graaf, B. C. Eikelboom, and W. P. T. M. Mali Maximum Internal Carotid Arterial Stenosis: Assessment with Rotational Angiography versus Conventional Intraarterial Digital Subtraction Angiography Radiology, December 1, 1999; 213(3): 777 - 783. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				D. W. Droste, R. Jurgens, D. G. Nabavi, G. Schuierer, S. Weber, and E. B. Ringelstein Echocontrast-Enhanced Ultrasound of Extracranial Internal Carotid Artery High-Grade Stenosis and Occlusion Stroke, November 1, 1999; 30(11): 2302 - 2306. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				O. E. H. Elgersma, M. van Leersum, P. C. Buijs, M. S. van Leeuwen, Y. T. van de Schouw, B. C. Eikelboom, and Y. van der Graaf Changes Over Time in Optimal Duplex Threshold for the Identification of Patients Eligible for Carotid Endarterectomy Stroke, November 1, 1998; 29(11): 2352 - 2356. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Arning, W. Steinke, M. Hennerici, S. Ries, A. Schwartz, and N. Artemis Evaluation of Carotid Artery Stenosis by Power Doppler Imaging • Response Stroke, October 1, 1998; 29(10): 2211 - 2213. [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Owega, J. Klingelhofer, O. Sabri, H. J. Kunert, M. Albers, and H. Saß Cerebral Blood Flow Velocity in Acute Schizophrenic Patients : A Transcranial Doppler Ultrasonography Study Stroke, June 1, 1998; 29(6): 1149 - 1154. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. V. Alexandrov, D. Vital, D. S. Brodie, P. Hamilton, and J. C. Grotta Grading Carotid Stenosis With Ultrasound : An Interlaboratory Comparison Stroke, June 1, 1997; 28(6): 1208 - 1210. [Abstract] [Full Text]