(Stroke. 1997;28:692-695.)
© 1997 American Heart Association, Inc.
Articles |
Use of a Decibel Threshold in Detecting Doppler Embolic Signals
From the Department of Neurology, King's College School of Medicine and Dentistry, and the Institute of Psychiatry, London, UK.
Correspondence to Dr Hugh Markus, Department of Neurology, Institute of Psychiatry, De Crespigny Park, London, SE5 8AF, UK. E-mail h.markus{at}iop.bpmf.ac.uk
Background and Purpose To improve reproducibility and reliability in the identification of embolic signals detected with the use of Doppler ultrasound, many studies have used an intensity threshold. However, variable thresholds between 3 and 12 dB have been used, and often the method of measurement of intensity is not stated. Potentially different methods of measurement could result in different intensity measurements for the same embolic signal. We determined the effect of these differences using commercial transcranial Doppler systems.
Methods We analyzed 81 embolic signals recorded from the middle cerebral arteries of patients with carotid artery disease using three different methods of measuring intensity that had been previously used in research studies. In method 1 individual time frames of the frequency spectra were analyzed, in method 2 a color-coded intensity scale was used, and in method 3 automated software was used.
Results There was a highly significant correlation between measurements made by the different techniques (method 1 versus method 2: r=.68, P<.0001; method 1 versus method 3: r=.66, P<.0001; method 2 versus method 3: r=.70, P<.0001). However, the absolute values of intensity for the same embolic signals varied markedly for the different methods. For example, a 4-dB threshold according to method 1 was equivalent to an approximately 7-dB threshold measured by method 2. These differences had major effects on the proportion of embolic signals detected with the use of the same decibel threshold but with intensity measured in the different ways. For example, using a threshold of 7 dB would result in only 4.9% of signals being missed by method 2 but 42.2% and 51.4% being missed by methods 1 and 3, respectively.
Conclusions Our results demonstrate that the intensities of the same embolic signals, recorded with the same parameters, are markedly different when analyzed in the different ways used in previous studies. This has important implications when a decibel threshold is used and emphasizes that criteria developed by one investigator on one machine cannot be used by another investigator without initial reevaluation. This could account for some of the differences in frequencies of embolic signals reported in previous clinical studies.
Key Words: carotid stenosis • cerebral embolism • ultrasonics
This article has been cited by other articles:
 |
|
 |
|
  V. K. Sharma, G. Tsivgoulis, A. Y. Lao, M. D. Malkoff, A. W. Alexandrov, and A. V. Alexandrov Quantification of Microspheres Appearance in Brain Vessels: Implications for Residual Flow Velocity Measurements, Dose Calculations, and Potential Drug Delivery Stroke, May 1, 2008; 39(5): 1476 - 1481. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. S. Markus and A. MacKinnon Asymptomatic Embolization Detected by Doppler Ultrasound Predicts Stroke Risk in Symptomatic Carotid Artery Stenosis Stroke, May 1, 2005; 36(5): 971 - 975. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 W. Plochl, C. G. Krenn, D. J. Cook, E. Gollob, T. Pezawas, H. Schima, O. Ipsiroglu, G. Wollenek, and G. Grubhofer Can hypocapnia reduce cerebral embolization during cardiopulmonary bypass? Ann. Thorac. Surg., September 1, 2001; 72(3): 845 - 849. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Cullinane, G. Reid, R. Dittrich, Z. Kaposzta, R. Ackerstaff, V. Babikian, D. W. Droste, D. Grossett, M. Siebler, L. Valton, et al. Evaluation of New Online Automated Embolic Signal Detection Algorithm, Including Comparison With Panel of International Experts Stroke, June 1, 2000; 31(6): 1335 - 1341. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. Markus, M. Cullinane, and G. Reid Improved Automated Detection of Embolic Signals Using a Novel Frequency Filtering Approach Stroke, August 1, 1999; 30(8): 1610 - 1615. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. L. Taylor, M. A. Borger, R. D. Weisel, L. Fedorko, and C. M. Feindel Cerebral microemboli during cardiopulmonary bypass: increased emboli during perfusionist interventions Ann. Thorac. Surg., July 1, 1999; 68(1): 89 - 93. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Molloy and H. S. Markus Asymptomatic Embolization Predicts Stroke and TIA Risk in Patients With Carotid Artery Stenosis Stroke, July 1, 1999; 30(7): 1440 - 1443. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. Molloy, J. F. Martin, P. A. Baskerville, S. C. A. Fraser, and H. S. Markus S-Nitrosoglutathione Reduces the Rate of Embolization in Humans Circulation, October 6, 1998; 98(14): 1372 - 1375. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Cullinane, R. Wainwright, A. Brown, M. Monaghan, and H. S. Markus Asymptomatic Embolization in Subjects With Atrial Fibrillation Not Taking Anticoagulants : A Prospective Study Stroke, September 1, 1998; 29(9): 1810 - 1815. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. W. M. Keunen, C. J. Stam, D. L. J. Tavy, W. H. Mess, B. M. Titulaer, and R. G. A. Ackerstaff Preliminary Report of Detecting Microembolic Signals in Transcranial Doppler Time Series With Nonlinear Forecasting Stroke, August 1, 1998; 29(8): 1638 - 1643. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. Bernd Ringelstein, D. W. Droste, V. L. Babikian, D. H. Evans, D. G. Grosset, M. Kaps, H. S. Markus, D. Russell, and M. Siebler Consensus on Microembolus Detection by TCD Stroke, March 1, 1998; 29(3): 725 - 729. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. S. Markus, R. Ackerstaff, V. Babikian, C. Bladin, D. Droste, D. Grosset, C. Levi, D. Russell, M. Siebler, and C. Tegeler Intercenter Agreement in Reading Doppler Embolic Signals : A Multicenter International Study Stroke, July 1, 1997; 28(7): 1307 - 1310. [Abstract] [Full Text]
|
|