This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Lorber, M. Articles by Becher, H. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Lorber, M. Articles by Becher, H.

(Stroke. 1998;29:257-258.)
© 1998 American Heart Association, Inc.

Letters to the Editor

Dental and Other Aspects of a Possible Association Between Cerebrovascular Ischemia and Chronic Infection

M. Lorber, DMD, MD

Department of Physiology and Biophysics, Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC

To the editor:

I believe that the report of Grau and colleagues¹ concerning acute cerebrovascular ischemia and infections has diagnostic, statistical, dental, and terminological aspects worthy of comment. This letter will address them sequentially.

All possible participants with two or more episodes of "cough with phlegm" during 3 or more months in each of 2 years were said to have "frequent or chronic bronchitis." In addition, Table 2 tabulated people who had "two or more episodes in life so far." That might not be too unusual in a middle-aged population. Even if major causes of cough such as tuberculosis or heart failure are ruled out, morning "cigarette cough"² or postnasal drip syndrome, allergy, environmental irritants, vasomotor rhinitis, and sinusitis³ rather than true bronchitis quite possibly were present in some participants. Therefore, perhaps not all of the study's productive coughers merited such classification.

Although multiple statistical methods were used, no probability value for significance was stated. This unusual omission is important because it was written that "...patients with cerebrovascular ischemia tended to have a worse dental status than the control group (P=.070 and P=.062, respectively)." By customary statistical criteria those differences, which are greater than .05, are not significant. Do the authors believe those larger probability values indicate meaningful differences? If not, their paper is largely based on that tendency rather than a significant association, despite use of the latter word in the title. This could well mislead the casual reader.

Regarding the dental aspects, the discussion states, . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Armin J. Grau, MD; Florian Buggle; Werner Hacke, MD

Neurology Department, University of Heidelberg

Christoph Ziegler, DMD, MD; Wolfgang Schwarz

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Heidelberg

Heiko Becher, PhD

Department of Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany