Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Stroke
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Stroke. 1998;29:2018-2025

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Moore, W. S.
Right arrow Articles by Toole, J. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Moore, W. S.
Right arrow Articles by Toole, J. F.

(Stroke. 1998;29:2018-2025.)
© 1998 American Heart Association, Inc.


Original Contributions

Recurrent Carotid Stenosis

Results of the Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerosis Study

Wesley S. Moore, MD; Richard F. Kempczinski, MD; J. J. Nelson, PhD; James F. Toole, MD; for the ACAS Investigators

From the Department of Surgery, University of California at Los Angeles School of Medicine (W.S.M.); Department of Surgery, University of Cincinnati Medical Center (Ohio) (R.F.K.); Department of Biostatistics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC (J.J.N.); and Department of Neurology, Bowman Gray School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC (J.F.T.).

Correspondence to Virginia J Howard, MSPH, Research Assistant Professor of Neurology, The Bowman Gray School of Medicine, Medical Center Blvd, Winston-Salem, NC 27157-1078. No reprints available.

Background and Purpose—We sought to determine the incidence of recurrent carotid stenosis in patients in the Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerosis Study (ACAS) who had undergone carotid endarterectomy and were prospectively followed with Doppler ultrasound for up to 5 years.

Methods—The ACAS database was interrogated to determine the rate of recurrent carotid stenosis (>=60%) based up angiogram-validated Doppler data, with a 90% and a 95% positive predictive value, as well as information concerning the technologists' interpretation of percent stenosis. These 3 parameters are reported for each of 3 time intervals: within 3 months of operation (residual disease), between 3 and 18 months (early restenoses), and between 18 and 60 months (late restenosis).

Results—Of the 825 patients randomized to the surgical arm of the study, 720 actually underwent carotid endarterectomy, and 645 had complete ultrasound data. The aggregate incidence of residual and recurrent carotid stenosis for all time intervals ranged from 12.7% to 20.4%, depending on the positive predictive value confidence level desired. Residual disease occurred in 4.1% to 6.5%; true, early restenosis was found in 7.6% to 11.4%; and late restenosis occurred in 1.9% to 4.9%. None of the traditional risk factors showed a statistically significant effect on recurrent stenosis. The use of patch angioplasty closure reduced overall risk of restenosis from 21.2% to 7.1%, from 16.7% to 4.6%, and from 27.4% to 8.2%, depending on the PPV confidence level desired (P<0.001). Of the 136 patients judged to have recurrent stenosis, only 8 (5.9%) underwent reoperation (only 1 for symptoms). There was no correlation between late stroke and recurrent stenosis.

Conclusions—Carotid endarterectomy is a durable procedure with a low rate of true restenosis, particularly when patch angioplasty is used to close the arteriotomy.


Key Words: angioplasty • carotid endarterectomy • carotid stenosis • prospective studies




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
N. Makihara, K. Toyoda, K. Uda, T. Inoue, S. Gotoh, S. Fujimoto, K. Yasumori, S. Ibayashi, M. Iida, and Y. Okada
Characteristic Sonographic Findings of Early Restenosis After Carotid Endarterectomy
J. Ultrasound Med., September 1, 2008; 27(9): 1345 - 1352.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio.Home page
G. Szeplaki, L. Varga, J. Laki, E. Dosa, S. Rugonfalvi-Kiss, H. O. Madsen, Z. Prohaszka, A. Kocsis, P. Gal, A. Szabo, et al.
Low C1-Inhibitor Levels Predict Early Restenosis After Eversion Carotid Endarterectomy
Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol, December 1, 2007; 27(12): 2756 - 2762.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
VASC ENDOVASCULAR SURGHome page
A. Schanzer, A. Hoel, C. D. Owens, N. Wake, L. L. Nguyen, M. S. Conte, and M. Belkin
Restenosis After Carotid Endarterectomy Performed With Routine Intraoperative Duplex Ultrasonography and Arterial Patch Closure: A Contemporary Series
Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, July 1, 2007; 41(3): 200 - 205.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
K. Groschel, A. Riecker, J. B. Schulz, U. Ernemann, and A. Kastrup
Systematic Review of Early Recurrent Stenosis After Carotid Angioplasty and Stenting
Stroke, February 1, 2005; 36(2): 367 - 373.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
VASC ENDOVASCULAR SURGHome page
C. D. Liapis and K. I. Paraskevas
Factors Affecting Recurrent Carotid Stenosis
Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, January 1, 2005; 39(1): 83 - 95.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
R. T. Higashida, P. M. Meyers, C. C. Phatouros, J. J. Connors III, J. D. Barr, D. Sacks, and for the Technology Assessment Committees of the Am
Reporting Standards for Carotid Artery Angioplasty and Stent Placement
Stroke, May 1, 2004; 35(5): e112 - e134.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
J. D. Barr, J. J. Connors III, D. Sacks, J. C. Wojak, G. J. Becker, J. F. Cardella, B. Chopko, J. E. Dion, A. J. Fox, R. T. Higashida, et al.
Quality Improvement Guidelines for the Performance of Cervical Carotid Angioplasty and Stent Placement: Developed by a Collaborative Panel of the American Society of Interventional and Therapeutic Neuroradiology, the American Society of Neuroradiology, and the Society of Interventional Radiology
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., November 1, 2003; 24(10): 2020 - 2034.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch SurgHome page
B. J. Marien, J. D. Raffetto, C. S. Seidman, W. W. LaMorte, and J. O. Menzoian
Bovine Pericardium vs Dacron for Patch Angioplasty After Carotid Endarterectomy: A Prospective Randomized Study
Arch Surg, July 1, 2002; 137(7): 785 - 788.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
W. A. Gray, H. J. White Jr, D. M. Barrett, G. Chandran, R. Turner, and M. Reisman
Carotid Stenting and Endarterectomy: A Clinical and Cost Comparison of Revascularization Strategies
Stroke, April 1, 2002; 33(4): 1063 - 1070.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
A. M. Malek, R. T. Higashida, C. C. Phatouros, T. E. Lempert, P. M. Meyers, W. S. Smith, C. F. Dowd, and V. V. Halbach
Stent Angioplasty for Cervical Carotid Artery Stenosis in High-Risk Symptomatic NASCET-Ineligible Patients
Stroke, December 1, 2000; 31(12): 3029 - 3033.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
C. C. Phatouros, R. T. Higashida, A. M. Malek, P. M. Meyers, T. E. Lempert, C. F. Dowd, and V. V. Halbach
Carotid Artery Stent Placement for Atherosclerotic Disease: Rationale, Technique, and Current Status
Radiology, October 1, 2000; 217(1): 26 - 41.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
CirculationHome page
P. Pauletto, M. Puato, E. Faggin, N. Santipolo, V. Pagliara, M. Zoleo, G. P. Deriu, F. Grego, M. Plebani, S. Sartore, et al.
Specific Cellular Features of Atheroma Associated With Development of Neointima After Carotid Endarterectomy : The Carotid Atherosclerosis and Restenosis Study
Circulation, August 15, 2000; 102(7): 771 - 778.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
A. F. AbuRahma, P. A. Robinson, S. Saiedy, B. K. Richmond, and J. Khan
Prospective Randomized Trial of Bilateral Carotid Endarterectomies : Primary Closure Versus Patching
Stroke, June 1, 1999; 30(6): 1185 - 1189.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]