Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Stroke
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lenzi, G. L.
Right arrow Articles by Dennis, M. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lenzi, G. L.
Right arrow Articles by Dennis, M. S.

(Stroke. 1998;29:2665.)
© 1998 American Heart Association, Inc.


Letters to the Editor

Is Visible Infarction on Computed Tomography Associated With an Adverse Prognosis in Acute Ischemic Stroke?

Gian Luigi Lenzi, MD

Department of Neurological Sciences, University of Roma I, Rome, Italy

To the Editor:

In the article by Wardlaw et al in the July issue of Stroke,1 the outcome of stroke patients with an evident lesion on CT scan was compared with the outcome of stroke patients with no evident lesion. The result was that the prognosis for a patient with a "clinical stroke" evident on CT scan also was worse than the prognosis for a patient showing no evidence on CT scan of the lesion causing the clinical stroke.

However, obvious, it may due to a bias.

How severe were the patients without the CT lesion? How were the various times of their CT scans distributed. Was it in a manner similar to that shown in the article's Figure 2, for patients with CT lesions? In fact, patients with total anterior circulation infarcts (TACI) are more frequent (80%–95%) in the group with a positive CT, and vice-versa, lacunar infarcts (LACI) are more frequent in the group without positive CT scan (45%–60%): ie, the results may be due just to this unbalance. In fact, the sentence, "Patients who had a CT scan within a week of the stroke were more likely to be dead or dependent at 6 months than those scanned later ..." (p 1317), does not indicate a lethal effect of the CT scan but rather that in the Lothian Area physicians tend to ask for CT scan earlier in the more severe cases.

Regarding the number of patients (n=124; 10% of the registry) who did not have . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Joanna M. Wardlaw, MRCP, FRCR, MD; Stephanie C. Lewis, MSc Martin S. Dennis, FRCP, MD

Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Western General Hospital NHS Trust, Edinburgh, Scotland