From the Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Physical
Education and Physiotherapy, University of Leuven (H.M.F., W.J. De W.); the
Department of Rehabilitation and Geriatric Medicine, Bürgerspital,
Solothurn (B.E.S., G.A.C.S., R.S.); the Department of Physical Medicine and
Rehabilitation, University Hospital, Antwerpen-Edegem (L.E.V.); the Department
of Physiotherapy, O.L.Vr. Hospital, Aalst (K.D.P.); and the Department of
Physiotherapy, Rehabilitation Center Hof ter Schelde, Antwerpen (G.A. Van H.),
Belgium.
Correspondence and reprint requests to Hilde Feys, Faculty of Physical Education and Physiotherapy, Tervuursevest 101, B-3001 Heverlee-Leuven, Belgium. E-mail Hilde.Feys{at}flok.kuleuven.ac.be
Background and PurposeArm function
recovery is notoriously poor in stroke patients. The effect of
treatment modalities, particularly those directed at improving upper
limb function, has been studied primarily in chronic stroke patients.
The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of a specific
therapeutic intervention on arm function in the acute phase after
stroke.
MethodsIn a single-blind, randomized, controlled multicenter
trial, 100consecutive patients were allocated to either an experimental
group that received an additional treatment of sensorimotor stimulation
or to a control group. The intervention was applied for 6 weeks.
Patients were evaluated for level of impairment
(Brunnström-Fugl-Meyer test) and disability (Action Research Arm
test, Barthel Index) before, midway, and after the intervention period
and at follow-up 6 and 12 months after stroke.
ResultsPatients in the experimental group performed better on
the Brunnström-Fugl-Meyer test than those in the control group
throughout the study period, but differences were significant only at
follow-up. Results on the Action Research Arm test and Barthel Index
revealed no effect at the level of disability. The effect of the
therapy was attributed to the repetitive stimulation of muscle
activity. The treatment was most effective in patients with a severe
motor deficit and hemianopia or hemi-inattention. No adverse effects
due to the intervention were found.
ConclusionsAdding a specific intervention during the acute phase
after stroke improved motor recovery, which was apparent 1 year later.
These results emphasize the potential beneficial effect of therapeutic
interventions for the arm.
© 1998 American Heart Association, Inc.
Original Contributions
Effect of a Therapeutic Intervention for the Hemiplegic Upper Limb in the Acute Phase After Stroke
A Single-Blind, Randomized, Controlled Multicenter Trial
Key Words: clinical trials rehabilitation stroke
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. Chae, M. Y. Harley, T. Z. Hisel, C. M. Corrigan, J. A. Demchak, Y.-T. Wong, and Z.-P. Fang Intramuscular Electrical Stimulation for Upper Limb Recovery in Chronic Hemiparesis: An Exploratory Randomized Clinical Trial Neurorehabil Neural Repair, July 1, 2009; 23(6): 569 - 578. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G.B. Prange, M.J.A. Jannink, A.H.A. Stienen, H. van der Kooij, M.J. IJzerman, and H.J. Hermens Influence of Gravity Compensation on Muscle Activation Patterns During Different Temporal Phases of Arm Movements of Stroke Patients Neurorehabil Neural Repair, June 1, 2009; 23(5): 478 - 485. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. J. Housman, K. M. Scott, and D. J. Reinkensmeyer A Randomized Controlled Trial of Gravity-Supported, Computer-Enhanced Arm Exercise for Individuals With Severe Hemiparesis Neurorehabil Neural Repair, June 1, 2009; 23(5): 505 - 514. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Rijntjes, K. Haevernick, A. Barzel, H. van den Bussche, G. Ketels, and C. Weiller Repeat Therapy for Chronic Motor Stroke: A Pilot Study for Feasibility and Efficacy Neurorehabil Neural Repair, March 1, 2009; 23(3): 275 - 280. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Dohle, J. Pullen, A. Nakaten, J. Kust, C. Rietz, and H. Karbe Mirror Therapy Promotes Recovery From Severe Hemiparesis: A Randomized Controlled Trial Neurorehabil Neural Repair, March 1, 2009; 23(3): 209 - 217. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Brittle, M. Brown, J. Mant, R. McManus, J. Riddoch, and C. Sackley Short-term effects on mobility, activities of daily living and health-related quality of life of a Conductive Education programme for adults with multiple sclerosis, Parkinson's disease and stroke Clinical Rehabilitation, April 1, 2008; 22(4): 329 - 337. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Hemmen and H.A.M. Seelen Effects of movement imagery and electromyography-triggered feedback on arm hand function in stroke patients in the subacute phase Clinical Rehabilitation, July 1, 2007; 21(7): 587 - 594. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Gaggioli, A. Meneghini, F. Morganti, M. Alcaniz, and G. Riva A Strategy for Computer-Assisted Mental Practice in Stroke Rehabilitation Neurorehabil Neural Repair, December 1, 2006; 20(4): 503 - 507. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Church, C. Price, A. D. Pandyan, S. Huntley, R. Curless, and H. Rodgers Randomized Controlled Trial to Evaluate the Effect of Surface Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation to the Shoulder After Acute Stroke Stroke, December 1, 2006; 37(12): 2995 - 3001. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Van de Winckel, H. Feys, S. van der Knaap, R. Messerli, F. Baronti, R. Lehmann, B. Van Hemelrijk, F. Pante`, C. Perfetti, and W. De Weerdt Can quality of movement be measured? Rasch analysis and inter-rater reliability of the Motor Evaluation Scale for Upper Extremity in Stroke Patients (MESUPES) Clinical Rehabilitation, October 1, 2006; 20(10): 871 - 884. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. S. Merians, H. Poizner, R. Boian, G. Burdea, and S. Adamovich Sensorimotor Training in a Virtual Reality Environment: Does It Improve Functional Recovery Poststroke? Neurorehabil Neural Repair, June 1, 2006; 20(2): 252 - 267. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Higgins, N. M Salbach, S. Wood-Dauphinee, C. L Richards, R. Cote, and N. E Mayo The effect of a task-oriented intervention on arm function in people with stroke: a randomized controlled trial Clinical Rehabilitation, April 1, 2006; 20(4): 296 - 310. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Yozbatiran, B. Donmez, N. Kayak, and O. Bozan Electrical stimulation of wrist and fingers for sensory and functional recovery in acute hemiplegia Clinical Rehabilitation, January 1, 2006; 20(1): 4 - 11. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.-C. Chen, C.-C. Liang, and F.-Z. Shaw Facilitation of Sensory and Motor Recovery by Thermal Intervention for the Hemiplegic Upper Limb in Acute Stroke Patients: A Single-Blind Randomized Clinical Trial Stroke, December 1, 2005; 36(12): 2665 - 2669. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T Platz, C Eickhof, S van Kaick, U Engel, C Pinkowski, S Kalok, and M Pause Impairment-oriented training or Bobath therapy for severe arm paresis after stroke: a single-blind, multicentre randomized controlled trial Clinical Rehabilitation, July 1, 2005; 19(7): 714 - 724. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P M van Vliet, N B Lincoln, and A Foxall Comparison of Bobath based and movement science based treatment for stroke: a randomised controlled trial J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, April 1, 2005; 76(4): 503 - 508. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. M. Pomeroy, C. A. Clark, J. S. G. Miller, J.-C. Baron, H. S. Markus, and R. C. Tallis The Potential for Utilizing the "Mirror Neurone System" to Enhance Recovery of the Severely Affected Upper Limb Early after Stroke: A Review and Hypothesis Neurorehabil Neural Repair, March 1, 2005; 19(1): 4 - 13. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Kwakkel, R. van Peppen, R. C. Wagenaar, S. Wood Dauphinee, C. Richards, A. Ashburn, K. Miller, N. Lincoln, C. Partridge, I. Wellwood, et al. Effects of Augmented Exercise Therapy Time After Stroke: A Meta-Analysis Stroke, November 1, 2004; 35(11): 2529 - 2539. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R P. Van Peppen, G Kwakkel, S Wood-Dauphinee, H J. Hendriks, P. J Van der Wees, and J Dekker The impact of physical therapy on functional outcomes after stroke: what's the evidence? Clinical Rehabilitation, August 1, 2004; 18(8): 833 - 862. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Feys, W. De Weerdt, G. Verbeke, G. C. Steck, C. Capiau, C. Kiekens, E. Dejaeger, G. Van Hoydonck, G. Vermeersch, and P. Cras Early and Repetitive Stimulation of the Arm Can Substantially Improve the Long-Term Outcome After Stroke: A 5-Year Follow-up Study of a Randomized Trial Stroke, April 1, 2004; 35(4): 924 - 929. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. G Canning, L. Ada, R. Adams, and N. J O'Dwyer Loss of strength contributes more to physical disability after stroke than loss of dexterity Clinical Rehabilitation, March 1, 2004; 18(3): 300 - 308. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Barreca, S. L. Wolf, S. Fasoli, and R. Bohannon Treatment Interventions for the Paretic Upper Limb of Stroke Survivors: A Critical Review Neurorehabil Neural Repair, December 1, 2003; 17(4): 220 - 226. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Rodgers, J. Mackintosh, C. Price, R. Wood, P. McNamee, T. Fearon, A. Marritt, and R. Curless Does an early increased-intensity interdisciplinary upper limb therapy programme following acute stroke improve outcome? Clinical Rehabilitation, June 1, 2003; 17(6): 579 - 589. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. M.J. Steultjens, J. Dekker, L. M. Bouter, J. C.M. van de Nes, E. H.C. Cup, C. H.M. van den Ende, F. Landi, and R. Bernabei Occupational Therapy for Stroke Patients: A Systematic Review * Occupational Therapy for Stroke Patients: When, Where, and How? Stroke, March 1, 2003; 34(3): 676 - 687. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D C Cambier, E De Corte, L A Danneels, and E E Witvrouw Treating sensory impairments in the post-stroke upper limb with intermittent pneumatic compression. Results of a preliminary trial Clinical Rehabilitation, January 1, 2003; 17(1): 14 - 20. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Goodwin and A. Sunderland Intensive, time-series measurement of upper limb recovery in the subacute phase following stroke Clinical Rehabilitation, January 1, 2003; 17(1): 69 - 82. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Ferraro, J. H. Demaio, J. Krol, C. Trudell, K. Rannekleiv, L. Edelstein, P. Christos, M. Aisen, J. England, S. Fasoli, et al. Assessing the Motor Status Score: A Scale for the Evaluation of Upper Limb Motor Outcomes in Patients after Stroke Neurorehabil Neural Repair, September 1, 2002; 16(3): 283 - 289. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. S Merians, D. Jack, R. Boian, M. Tremaine, G. C Burdea, S. V Adamovich, M. Recce, and H. Poizner Virtual Reality-Augmented Rehabilitation for Patients Following Stroke Physical Therapy, September 1, 2002; 82(9): 898 - 915. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S H Peurala, K Pitkanen, J Sivenius, and I M Tarkka Cutaneous electrical stimulation may enhance sensorimotor recovery in chronic stroke Clinical Rehabilitation, July 1, 2002; 16(7): 709 - 716. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S.-M. Lai, S. Studenski, P. W. Duncan, and S. Perera Persisting Consequences of Stroke Measured by the Stroke Impact Scale Stroke, July 1, 2002; 33(7): 1840 - 1844. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. H van der Lee, L. D Roorda, H. Beckerman, G. J Lankhorst, and L. M Bouter Improving the Action Research Arm test: a unidimensional hierarchical scale Clinical Rehabilitation, June 1, 2002; 16(6): 646 - 653. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I-P. Hsueh, M.-M. Lee, and C.-L. Hsieh The Action Research Arm Test: is it necessary for patients being tested to sit at a standardized table? Clinical Rehabilitation, April 1, 2002; 16(4): 382 - 388. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. A. K. Snels, H. Beckerman, J. J. ten Kate, G. J. Lankhorst, and L. M. Bouter Measuring Subluxation of the Hemiplegic Shoulder: Reliability of a Method Neurorehabil Neural Repair, September 1, 2001; 15(3): 249 - 254. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C I. Price and A D Pandyan Electrical stimulation for preventing and treating post-stroke shoulder pain: a systematic Cochrane review Clinical Rehabilitation, January 1, 2001; 15(1): 5 - 19. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. H van der Lee, I. A. Snels, H. Beckerman, G. J Lankhorst, R. C Wagenaar, and L. M Bouter Exercise therapy for arm function in stroke patients: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials Clinical Rehabilitation, January 1, 2001; 15(1): 20 - 31. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. T. Volpe, H. I. Krebs, N. Hogan, L. Edelstein, C. Diels, and M. Aisen A novel approach to stroke rehabilitation: Robot-aided sensorimotor stimulation Neurology, May 23, 2000; 54(10): 1938 - 1944. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Feys, J. Van Hees, F. Bruyninckx, R. Mercelis, and W. De Weerdt Value of somatosensory and motor evoked potentials in predicting arm recovery after a stroke J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, March 1, 2000; 68(3): 323 - 331. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. T. Volpe, H. I. Krebs, N. Hogan, L. Edelsteinn, C. M. Diels, and M. L. Aisen Robot training enhanced motor outcome in patients with stroke maintained over 3 years Neurology, November 1, 1999; 53(8): 1874 - 1874. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
R H Parry, N B Lincoln, and C D Vass Effect of severity of arm impairment on response to additional physiotherapy early after stroke Clinical Rehabilitation, March 1, 1999; 13(3): 187 - 198. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. B. Lincoln, R. H. Parry, and C. D. Vass Randomized, Controlled Trial to Evaluate Increased Intensity of Physiotherapy Treatment of Arm Function After Stroke Stroke, March 1, 1999; 30(3): 573 - 579. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
|
Stroke Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 1998 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |