Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Stroke
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Stroke. 1998;29:1838-1842

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lai, S.-M.
Right arrow Articles by Keighley, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lai, S.-M.
Right arrow Articles by Keighley, J.

(Stroke. 1998;29:1838-1842.)
© 1998 American Heart Association, Inc.


Original Contributions

Prediction of Functional Outcome After Stroke

Comparison of the Orpington Prognostic Scale and the NIH Stroke Scale

Sue-Min Lai, PhD, MS, MBA; Pamela W. Duncan, PhD, PT; John Keighley, MS

From the Department of Preventive Medicine (S.-M.L., J.K.), and the Center on Aging (P.W.D.), University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City; the Department of Veteran Affairs Medical Center (P.W.D.), Kansas City, Mo; and the Department of Health Services Research, University of Kansas, Lawrence.

Correspondence to Sue-Min Lai, PhD, MS, MBA, Department of Preventive Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, 3901 Rainbow Blvd, Kansas City, KS 66160-7313. E-mail smlai{at}kumc.edu

Background and Purpose—This study compared the ability of 2 stroke impairment scales, Orpington Prognostic Scale and National Institutes of Health (NIH) Stroke Scale, to predict disability as measured by the Barthel activities of daily living (ADL) Index and higher level of self-reported physical functioning as measured by the SF-36 physical functioning index (PFI) at 1, 3, and 6 months after stroke.

Methods—The participants in this ongoing study are 184 individuals who sustained an eligible stroke and were recruited for the Kansas City Stroke Study. All patients were prospectively evaluated using standardized assessments at enrollment (within 14 days of stroke onset) and followed at 1, 3, and 6 months after stroke. Coefficient of determination (R2) was used to assess the ability of the 2 stroke scales to prognosticate outcomes.

Results—Means and SDs of the Orpington Prognostic Scale and NIH Stroke Scale measured at baseline were 3.6±1.31 and 5.5±4.58, respectively. The Spearman's rank correlation between the 2 baseline measures was 0.83 (P=0.0001). The Orpington Prognostic Scale and the NIH Stroke Scale explained well the variance in Barthel ADL Index (P<0.001). However, the Orpington Prognostic Scale explained more variance than did the NIH Stroke Scale. Similarly, the Orpington Prognostic Score explained more variance in higher level of physical function than did the NIH Stroke Scale. The amount of variance in Barthel ADL Index and SF-36 PFI, which were explained by both stroke severity measures, decreased over time.

Conclusions—Our results demonstrate that in a sample of mostly mild and moderate strokes, the Orpington Prognostic Scale compared with the NIH Stroke Scale is simpler to use and is a slightly better predictor of ADL and higher levels of physical function.


Key Words: activities of daily living • impairment • physical function • stroke




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Neurorehabil Neural RepairHome page
S. F. Tyson, M. Hanley, J. Chillala, A. B. Selley, and R. C. Tallis
Sensory Loss in Hospital-Admitted People With Stroke: Characteristics, Associated Factors, and Relationship With Function
Neurorehabil Neural Repair, April 1, 2008; 22(2): 166 - 172.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
ptjournalHome page
D. S Reisman and J. P Scholz
Deficits in Surface Force Production During Seated Reaching in People After Stroke
Physical Therapy, March 1, 2007; 87(3): 326 - 336.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ptjournalHome page
J. E Harris and J. J Eng
Paretic Upper-Limb Strength Best Explains Arm Activity in People With Stroke
Physical Therapy, January 1, 2007; 87(1): 88 - 97.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ptjournalHome page
M. Schenkman, J. E Deutsch, and K. M Gill-Body
An Integrated Framework for Decision Making in Neurologic Physical Therapist Practice
Physical Therapy, December 1, 2006; 86(12): 1681 - 1702.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Neurorehabil Neural RepairHome page
B. M. Quaney, S. Perera, R. Maletsky, C. W. Luchies, and R. J. Nudo
Impaired Grip Force Modulation in the Ipsilesional Hand after Unilateral Middle Cerebral Artery Stroke
Neurorehabil Neural Repair, December 1, 2005; 19(4): 338 - 349.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
T. Koyama, K. Matsumoto, T. Okuno, and K. Domen
A new method for predicting functional recovery of stroke patients with hemiplegia: logarithmic modelling
Clinical Rehabilitation, July 1, 2005; 19(7): 779 - 789.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
D. Meldrum, S. J Pittock, O. Hardiman, C. N. Dhuill, M. O'Regan, and J. T Moroney
Recovery of the upper limb post ischaemic stroke and the predictive value of the Orpington Prognostic Score
Clinical Rehabilitation, June 1, 2004; 18(6): 694 - 702.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
M. M. Ouellette, N. K. LeBrasseur, J. F. Bean, E. Phillips, J. Stein, W. R. Frontera, and R. A. Fielding
High-Intensity Resistance Training Improves Muscle Strength, Self-Reported Function, and Disability in Long-Term Stroke Survivors
Stroke, June 1, 2004; 35(6): 1404 - 1409.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
S. Kwon, A. G. Hartzema, P. W. Duncan, and S. Min-Lai
Disability Measures in Stroke: Relationship Among the Barthel Index, the Functional Independence Measure, and the Modified Rankin Scale
Stroke, April 1, 2004; 35(4): 918 - 923.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
Performance of a Statistical Model to Predict Stroke Outcome in the Context of a Large, Simple, Randomized, Controlled Trial of Feeding
Stroke, January 1, 2003; 34(1): 127 - 133.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
D. L. Tirschwell, W.T. Longstreth Jr, K. J. Becker, R. E. Gammans Sr, L. A. Sabounjian, S. Hamilton, and L. B. Morgenstern
Shortening the NIH Stroke Scale for Use in the Prehospital Setting
Stroke, December 1, 2002; 33(12): 2801 - 2806.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
D. J. Gladstone, S. E. Black, and A. M. Hakim
Toward Wisdom From Failure: Lessons From Neuroprotective Stroke Trials and New Therapeutic Directions
Stroke, August 1, 2002; 33(8): 2123 - 2136.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
S.-M. Lai, S. Studenski, P. W. Duncan, and S. Perera
Persisting Consequences of Stroke Measured by the Stroke Impact Scale
Stroke, July 1, 2002; 33(7): 1840 - 1844.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
P. W. Duncan, D. Wallace, S. M. Lai, D. Johnson, S. Embretson, and L. J. Laster
The Stroke Impact Scale Version 2.0 : Evaluation of Reliability, Validity, and Sensitivity to Change
Stroke, October 1, 1999; 30 (10): 2131k - 2140.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
S. Shafqat, J. C. Kvedar, M. M. Guanci, Y. Chang, and L. H. Schwamm
Role for Telemedicine in Acute Stroke : Feasibility and Reliability of Remote Administration of the NIH Stroke Scale
Stroke, October 1, 1999; 30(10): 2141 - 2145.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
S.-M. Lai and P. W. Duncan
Evaluation of the American Heart Association Stroke Outcome Classification
Stroke, September 1, 1999; 30(9): 1840 - 1843.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]