| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Stroke. 1999;30:2585.)
© 1999 American Heart Association, Inc.
Original Contributions |
Randomized Controlled Trial of a Comprehensive Stroke Education Program for Patients and Caregivers
From the School of Clinical Medical Science (H.R., C.A.,R.D., R.C.) and the School of Health Sciences (H.R., S.B., R.D.), University of Newcastle on Tyne, Newcastle on Tyne, England; and North Tyneside General Hospital (H.R., M.S., R.C.), Northumbria Health Care NHS Trust, North Shields, Tyne and Wear, England.
Correspondence to Dr Helen Rodgers, Senior Lecturer in Stroke Medicine and Services, Centre for Health Services Research, 21 Claremont Place, The University Newcastle on Tyne NE2 4AA, England. E-mail helen.rodgers{at}ncl.ac.uk
Background and Purpose—We report the findings of a randomized controlled trial to determine the effectiveness of a multidisciplinary Stroke Education Program (SEP) for patients and their informal carers.
Methods—Two hundred four patients admitted with acute stroke and their 176 informal carers were randomized to receive an invitation to the SEP or to receive conventional stroke unit care. The SEP consisted of one 1-hour small group educational session for inpatients followed by six 1-hour sessions after discharge. The primary outcome measure was patient- and carer-perceived health status (SF-36) at 6 months after stroke. Knowledge of stroke, satisfaction with services, emotional outcome, disability, and handicap and were secondary outcome measures.
Results—Only 51 of 108 (47%) surviving patients randomized to the SEP completed the program, as did 20 of 93 (22%) informal carers of surviving patients. Perceived health status (Short Form 36 [SF-36] health survey) scores were similar for SEP patients and controls. Informal carers in the control group scored better on the social functioning component of the SF-36 than the SEP group (P=0.04). Patients and informal carers in the SEP group scored higher on the stroke knowledge scale than controls (patients, P=0.02; carers, P=0.01). Patients in the SEP group were more satisfied with the information that they had received about stroke (P=0.004). There were no differences in emotional or functional outcomes between groups.
Conclusions—Although the SEP improved patient and informal carer knowledge about stroke and patient satisfaction with some components of stroke services, this was not associated with an improvement in their perceived health status. Indeed, the social functioning of informal carers randomized to the SEP was less than in the control group.
Key Words: stroke management • clinical trials • rehabilitation
This article has been cited by other articles:
 |
|
 |
|
  S. P. Jones, A. J. Jenkinson, M. J. Leathley, and C. L. Watkins Stroke knowledge and awareness: an integrative review of the evidence Age Ageing, November 6, 2009; (2009) afp196v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 K. Berzins, S. Reilly, J. Abell, J. Hughes, and D. Challis UK self-care support initiatives for older patients with long-term conditions: a review Chronic Illness, March 1, 2009; 5(1): 56 - 72. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. Smith, A. Forster, J. Young, and On behalf of the Cochrane Group for information pr Cochrane review: information provision for stroke patients and their caregivers Clinical Rehabilitation, March 1, 2009; 23(3): 195 - 206. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Franzen-Dahlin, J. Larson, V. Murray, R. Wredling, and E. Billing A randomized controlled trial evaluating the effect of a support and education programme for spouses of people affected by stroke Clinical Rehabilitation, August 1, 2008; 22(8): 722 - 730. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 E. Howell, C. Graham, A Hoffman, D Lowe, C. McKevitt, R. Reeves, and A G Rudd Comparison of patients' assessments of the quality of stroke care with audit findings Qual. Saf. Health Care, December 1, 2007; 16(6): 450 - 455. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K.A. Ertel, M.M. Glymour, T.A. Glass, and L.F. Berkman Frailty modifies effectiveness of psychosocial intervention in recovery from stroke Clinical Rehabilitation, June 1, 2007; 21(6): 511 - 522. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. Lee, K. Soeken, and S. J. Picot A Meta-Analysis of Interventions for Informal Stroke Caregivers West J Nurs Res, April 1, 2007; 29(3): 344 - 356. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. M. Buckley Commentary by Buckley West J Nurs Res, April 1, 2007; 29(3): 357 - 359. [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. B. Lowe, A. K. Sharma, and M. J. Leathley The CareFile Project: a feasibility study to examine the effects of an individualised information booklet on patients after stroke Age Ageing, January 1, 2007; 36(1): 83 - 89. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. Redfern, C. McKevitt, and C. D.A. Wolfe Development of Complex Interventions in Stroke Care: A Systematic Review Stroke, September 1, 2006; 37(9): 2410 - 2419. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. W. Duncan, R. Zorowitz, B. Bates, J. Y. Choi, J. J. Glasberg, G. D. Graham, R. C. Katz, K. Lamberty, and D. Reker Management of Adult Stroke Rehabilitation Care: A Clinical Practice Guideline Stroke, September 1, 2005; 36(9): e100 - e143. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. Robinson, J. Francis, P. James, N. Tindle, K. Greenwell, and H. Rodgers Caring for carers of people with stroke: developing a complex intervention following the Medical Research Council framework Clinical Rehabilitation, May 1, 2005; 19(5): 560 - 571. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. Boter and for the HESTIA Study Group Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial of an Outreach Nursing Support Program for Recently Discharged Stroke Patients Stroke, December 1, 2004; 35(12): 2867 - 2872. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Smith, A. Forster, and J. Young A randomized trial to evaluate an education programme for patients and carers after stroke Clinical Rehabilitation, July 1, 2004; 18(7): 726 - 736. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J M A. Visser-Meily, M. W M Post, I. I Riphagen, and E. Lindeman Measures used to assess burden among caregivers of stroke patients: a review Clinical Rehabilitation, June 1, 2004; 18(6): 601 - 623. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 G. J Hankey Informal care giving for disabled stroke survivors BMJ, May 8, 2004; 328(7448): 1085 - 1086. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. Boter, G. J. Rinkel, and R. J de Haan Outreach nurse support after stroke: a descriptive study on patients' and carers' needs, and applied nursing interventions Clinical Rehabilitation, February 1, 2004; 18(2): 156 - 163. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. S Clark, S. Rubenach, and A. Winsor A randomized controlled trial of an education and counselling intervention for families after stroke Clinical Rehabilitation, July 1, 2003; 17(7): 703 - 712. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Fisher Recommendations for Advancing Development of Acute Stroke Therapies: Stroke Therapy Academic Industry Roundtable 3 Stroke, June 1, 2003; 34(6): 1539 - 1546. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|