| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Stroke. 1999;30:855-862.)
© 1999 American Heart Association, Inc.
Original Contributions |
From the Departments of Neurological Surgery and Neurology, University of Miami School of Medicine (Fla).
Correspondence to W. Dalton Dietrich, PhD, Department of Neurological Surgery and Neurology (D4-5), PO Box 016960, University of Miami School of Medicine, Miami, FL 33101. E-mail dalton{at}stroke.med.miami.edu
Background and PurposeTransient distal platelet accumulation after common carotid artery thrombosis (CCAT) leads to hemodynamic, metabolic, and molecular events that may influence the response of the postthrombotic brain to secondary insults. We investigated how a thromboembolic insult would affect histopathological outcome when combined with an ischemic insult induced 24 hours later.
MethodsThree groups of rats underwent either (1) CCAT+10 minutes of normothermic 2-vessel occlusion (n=6), (2) CCAT+sham ischemia procedures (n=6), or (3) sham CCAT procedures+10 minutes of 2-vessel occlusion (n=6). At 7 days, rats were perfused for quantitative histopathological and immunocytochemical analysis.
ResultsRats undergoing combined insults (group 1) had significantly larger areas of ischemic injury (P<0.05) within the cerebral cortex, striatum, and thalamus compared with the other, single-injury groups. Increased ischemic damage included selective neuronal necrosis, infarction, and focal hemorrhage. By means of glial fibrillary acidic protein immunocytochemistry and lectin histochemistry, reactive astrocytes and microglia were found to be associated with widespread tissue necrosis. In contrast, infrequent infarction or CA1 hippocampal neuronal necrosis was observed in groups 2 and 3, respectively.
ConclusionsA prior thromboembolic event is a risk factor for widespread cerebral infarction and hemorrhage when combined with a delayed ischemic insult. The understanding of what factors enhance the susceptibility of the postthrombotic brain to secondary insults may aid in the development of neuroprotective strategies to be applied after transient ischemic attacks to prevent the initiation of stroke.
Department of Physiology, Center for Perinatal Biology, Loma Linda University School of Medicine, Loma Linda, California
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D.-W. Kang, L. L. Latour, J. A. Chalela, J. A. Dambrosia, and S. Warach Early and late recurrence of ischemic lesion on MRI: Evidence for a prolonged stroke-prone state? Neurology, December 28, 2004; 63(12): 2261 - 2265. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. H. Danton and W. D. Dietrich The Search for Neuroprotective Strategies in Stroke AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., February 1, 2004; 25(2): 181 - 194. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. H. Danton, R. Prado, B. D. Watson, and W. D. Dietrich Temporal Profile of Enhanced Vulnerability of the Postthrombotic Brain to Secondary Embolic Events Stroke, April 1, 2002; 33(4): 1113 - 1119. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
|
Stroke Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 1999 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |