| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Stroke. 1999;30:934-938.)
© 1999 American Heart Association, Inc.
Original Contributions |
From the School of Healthcare Studies (P.K.) and School of Psychology (J.H.), University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Correspondence to Dr P. Knapp, School of Healthcare Studies, 10 Clarendon Road, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9NN, UK. E-mail p.r.knapp{at}leeds.ac.uk
Background and PurposeThe aims of this study were to describe differences between functional ability assessments made by stroke patients and their informal carers and to investigate the psychological associates of the difference in assessments.
MethodsA prospective design was used, with repeated assessments of function, mood, and carer strain. Thirty hospital stroke patients and their main carer were interviewed 3 times: within 1 month of stroke, 1 month after discharge, and 6 months after discharge.
ResultsThere were significant differences between patient and carer assessments at all 3 time points, with patient self-assessment less disabled than carer assessment (at least P<0.02). The disagreement in assessment was unrelated to patient or carer mood (P>0.05) but greater disagreement was associated with greater carer strain (P<0.05). The source of the disagreement in functional ability assessment remains unclear.
ConclusionsThe method of assessment affects the rating of functional abilities after stroke. Carer strain is potentially increased when the patient or carer makes an unrealistic assessment of the patient's level of independence.
Key Words: activities of daily living caregivers mood disorders neuropsychological tests stroke
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M.-H. Chen, C.-L. Hsieh, H.-F. Mao, and S.-L. Huang Differences between patient and proxy reports in the assessment of disability after stroke Clinical Rehabilitation, April 1, 2007; 21(4): 351 - 356. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J M A. Visser-Meily, M. W M Post, I. I Riphagen, and E. Lindeman Measures used to assess burden among caregivers of stroke patients: a review Clinical Rehabilitation, June 1, 2004; 18(6): 601 - 623. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. R Tooth, K. T McKenna, and M. Smith Further evidence for the agreement between patients with stroke and their proxies on the Frenchay Activities Index Clinical Rehabilitation, June 1, 2003; 17(6): 656 - 665. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
|
Stroke Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 1999 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |