This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Pell, G. S. Articles by Rosenberg, G. A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Pell, G. S. Articles by Rosenberg, G. A.

(Stroke. 1999;30:1263-1270.)
© 1999 American Heart Association, Inc.

Original Contributions

Reperfusion in a Gerbil Model of Forebrain Ischemia Using Serial Magnetic Resonance FAIR Perfusion Imaging

Gaby S. Pell, MSc; Mark F. Lythgoe, MSc; David L. Thomas, BSc; Fernando Calamante, BSc; Martin D. King, PhD; David G. Gadian, PhD Roger J. Ordidge, PhD

From the Department of Medical Physics and Bioengineering, University College London (G.S.P., D.L.T., R.J.O.), and The Royal College of Surgeons Unit of Biophysics, Institute of Child Health, University College London Medical School, (D.L.T., F.C., M.F.L., M.D.K., D.G.G.), London, UK.

Correspondence to Gaby Pell, RCS Unit of Biophysics, Institute of Child Health, 30 Guilford Street, London WC1N 1EH, UK. E-mail g.pell{at}medphys.ucl.ac.uk

Background and Purpose—Existing methods for the quantitative measurement of the changing cerebral blood flow (CBF) during reperfusion suffer from poor spatial or temporal resolution. The aim of this study was to implement a recently developed MRI technique for quantitative perfusion imaging in a gerbil model of reperfusion. Flow-sensitive alternating inversion recovery (FAIR) is a noninvasive procedure that uses blood water as an endogenous tracer.

Methods—Bilateral forebrain ischemia of 4 minutes' duration was induced in gerbils (n=8). A modified version of FAIR with improved time efficiency was used to provide CBF maps with a time resolution of 2.8 minutes after recirculation had been initiated. Quantitative diffusion imaging was also performed at intervals during the reperfusion period.

Results—On initiating recirculation after the transient period of ischemia, the FAIR measurements demonstrated either a symmetrical, bilateral pattern of flow impairment (n=4) or an immediate side-to-side difference that became apparent with respect to the cerebral hemispheres in the imaged slice (n=4). The flow in each hemisphere displayed a pattern of recovery close to the preocclusion level or, alternatively, returned to a lower level before displaying a delayed hypoperfusion and a subsequent slow recovery. The diffusion measurements during this latter response suggested the development of cell swelling during the reperfusion phase in the striatum.

Conclusions—The CBF during the reperfusion period was monitored with a high time resolution, noninvasive method. This study demonstrates the utility of MRI techniques in following blood flow changes and their pathophysiological consequences.

Editorial Comment

Gary A. Rosenberg, MD, Guest Editor

Department of Neurology, University of New Mexico School of Medicine, Albuquerque, New Mexico