(Stroke. 1999;30:1362-1369.)
© 1999 American Heart Association, Inc.
Original Contributions |
Development of a Stroke-Specific Quality of Life Scale
From Roudebush Veterans Affairs Medical Center (L.S.W., M.W.); Departments of Neurology (L.S.W., J.B.) and Medicine (M.W., L.E.H., D.O.C.), Indiana University School of Medicine; and Regenstrief Institute for Health Care (L.S.W., M.W., L.E.H., D.O.C.), Indianapolis, Ind.
Correspondence to Linda S. Williams, MD, Roudebush VAMC, HSR&D 11-H, Indiana University School of Medicine, 1481 W 10th St, Indianapolis, IN 46202. E-mail lwilliams{at}hsrd.va.iupui.edu
Background and Purpose—Clinical stroke trials are increasingly measuring patient-centered outcomes such as functional status and health-related quality of life (HRQOL). No stroke-specific HRQOL measure is currently available. This study presents the initial development of a valid, reliable, and responsive stroke-specific quality of life (SS-QOL) measure, for use in stroke trials.
Methods—Domains and items for the SS-QOL were developed from patient interviews. The SS-QOL, Short Form 36, Beck Depression Inventory, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale, and Barthel Index were administered to patients 1 and 3 months after ischemic stroke. Items were eliminated with the use of standard psychometric criteria. Construct validity was assessed by comparing domain scores with similar domains of established measures. Domain responsiveness was assessed with standardized effect sizes .
Results—All 12 domains of the SS-QOL were unidimensional. In the
final 49-item scale, all domains demonstrated excellent internal
reliability (Cronbach's 
values for each domain 
0.73). Most
domains were moderately correlated with similar domains of established
outcome measures (r2 range, 0.3 to 0.5).
Most domains were responsive to change (standardized effect sizes
>0.4). One- and 3-month SS-QOL scores were associated with patients'
self-report of HRQOL compared with before their stroke
(P<0.001).
Conclusions—The SS-QOL measures HRQOL, its primary underlying construct, in stroke patients. Preliminary results regarding the reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the SS-QOL are encouraging. Further studies in diverse stroke populations are needed.
Key Words: cerebral infarction • outcome • quality of life
This article has been cited by other articles:
 |
|
 |
|
  A. Long, A. Hesketh, and A. Bowen Communication outcome after stroke: a new measure of the carer's perspective Clinical Rehabilitation, September 1, 2009; 23(9): 846 - 856. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. Hilari, D. L Lamping, S. C Smith, S. Northcott, A. Lamb, and J. Marshall Psychometric properties of the Stroke and Aphasia Quality of Life Scale (SAQOL-39) in a generic stroke population Clinical Rehabilitation, June 1, 2009; 23(6): 544 - 557. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 I. Muus, M. Petzold, and K. C. Ringsberg Health-Related Quality of Life After Stroke: Reliability of Proxy Responses Clin Nurs Res, May 1, 2009; 18(2): 103 - 118. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M Hommel, S Trabucco-Miguel, S Joray, B Naegele, N Gonnet, and A Jaillard Social dysfunctioning after mild to moderate first-ever stroke at vocational age J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, April 1, 2009; 80(4): 371 - 375. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J.M. A. Visser-Meily, M. L. Rhebergen, G. J.E. Rinkel, M. J. van Zandvoort, and M. W.M. Post Long-Term Health-Related Quality of Life After Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: Relationship With Psychological Symptoms and Personality Characteristics Stroke, April 1, 2009; 40(4): 1526 - 1529. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 Cumberland Consensus Working Group, B. Cheeran, L. Cohen, B. Dobkin, G. Ford, R. Greenwood, D. Howard, M. Husain, M. Macleod, R. Nudo, et al. The Future of Restorative Neurosciences in Stroke: Driving the Translational Research Pipeline From Basic Science to Rehabilitation of People After Stroke Neurorehabil Neural Repair, February 1, 2009; 23(2): 97 - 107. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. L. Harvey, C. J. Winstein, and for the Everest Trial Group Design for the Everest Randomized Trial of Cortical Stimulation and Rehabilitation for Arm Function Following Stroke Neurorehabil Neural Repair, January 1, 2009; 23(1): 32 - 44. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Bruno, T. A. Kent, B. M. Coull, R. R. Shankar, C. Saha, K. J. Becker, B. M. Kissela, and L. S. Williams Treatment of Hyperglycemia In Ischemic Stroke (THIS): A Randomized Pilot Trial Stroke, February 1, 2008; 39(2): 384 - 389. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. Hilari, S. Owen, and S. J. Farrelly Proxy and self-report agreement on the Stroke and Aphasia Quality of Life Scale-39 J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, October 1, 2007; 78(10): 1072 - 1075. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. W. Gargano, M. J. Reeves, and for the Paul Coverdell National Acute Stroke Regis Sex Differences in Stroke Recovery and Stroke-Specific Quality of Life: Results From a Statewide Stroke Registry Stroke, September 1, 2007; 38(9): 2541 - 2548. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
I. Muus, L. S. Williams, and K. C. Ringsberg Validation of the Stroke Specific Quality of Life Scale (SS-QOL): test of reliability and validity of the Danish version (SS-QOL-DK) Clinical Rehabilitation, July 1, 2007; 21(7): 620 - 627. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. Ewert and G. Stucki Validity of the SS-QOL in Germany and in Survivors of Hemorrhagic or Ischemic Stroke Neurorehabil Neural Repair, March 1, 2007; 21(2): 161 - 168. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 D. C. Goff Jr, L. Brass, L. T. Braun, J. B. Croft, J. D. Flesch, F. G.R. Fowkes, Y. Hong, V. Howard, S. Huston, S. F. Jencks, et al. Essential Features of a Surveillance System to Support the Prevention and Management of Heart Disease and Stroke: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association Councils on Epidemiology and Prevention, Stroke, and Cardiovascular Nursing and the Interdisciplinary Working Groups on Quality of Care and Outcomes Research and Atherosclerotic Peripheral Vascular Disease Circulation, January 2, 2007; 115(1): 127 - 155. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. S. Williams, T. Bakas, E. Brizendine, L. Plue, W. Tu, H. Hendrie, and K. Kroenke How Valid Are Family Proxy Assessments of Stroke Patients' Health-Related Quality of Life? Stroke, August 1, 2006; 37(8): 2081 - 2085. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. Kissela The Value of Quality of Life Research in Stroke Stroke, August 1, 2006; 37(8): 1958 - 1959. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. L. Hallemeier, K. M. Rich, R. L. Grubb Jr, M. R. Chicoine, C. J. Moran, D. T. Cross III, G. J. Zipfel, R. G. Dacey Jr, and C. P. Derdeyn Clinical Features and Outcome in North American Adults With Moyamoya Phenomenon Stroke, June 1, 2006; 37(6): 1490 - 1496. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. Hilari, S. Byng, D. L. Lamping, and S. C. Smith Stroke and Aphasia Quality of Life Scale-39 (SAQOL-39): Evaluation of Acceptability, Reliability, and Validity Stroke, August 1, 2003; 34(8): 1944 - 1950. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
W. M. Hopman and J. Verner Quality of Life During and After Inpatient Stroke Rehabilitation Stroke, March 1, 2003; 34(3): 801 - 805. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 P.W. Duncan, S.M. Lai, R.K. Bode, S. Perera, and J. DeRosa Stroke Impact Scale-16: A brief assessment of physical function Neurology, January 28, 2003; 60(2): 291 - 296. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. W. Sturm, R. H. Osborne, H. M. Dewey, G. A. Donnan, R. A.L. Macdonell, and A. G. Thrift Brief Comprehensive Quality of Life Assessment After Stroke: The Assessment of Quality of Life Instrument in the North East Melbourne Stroke Incidence Study (NEMESIS) Stroke, December 1, 2002; 33(12): 2888 - 2894. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. J. Gladstone, S. E. Black, and A. M. Hakim Toward Wisdom From Failure: Lessons From Neuroprotective Stroke Trials and New Therapeutic Directions Stroke, August 1, 2002; 33(8): 2123 - 2136. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. C. Hobart, L. S. Williams, K. Moran, and A. J. Thompson Quality of Life Measurement After Stroke: Uses and Abuses of the SF-36 Stroke, May 1, 2002; 33(5): 1348 - 1356. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. J. Greenlund, W. H. Giles, N. L. Keenan, J. B. Croft, G. A. Mensah, and S. L. Huston Physician Advice, Patient Actions, and Health-Related Quality of Life in Secondary Prevention of Stroke Through Diet and Exercise * The Physician's Role in Helping Patients to Increase Physical Activity and Improve Eating Habits Stroke, February 1, 2002; 33(2): 565 - 571. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. A. Freeman, J. C. Hobart, and A. J. Thompson Does adding MS-specific items to a generic measure (the SF-36) improve measurement? Neurology, July 10, 2001; 57(1): 68 - 74. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. P. Samsa and D. B. Matchar Have Randomized Controlled Trials of Neuroprotective Drugs Been Underpowered? : An Illustration of Three Statistical Principles Stroke, March 1, 2001; 32(3): 669 - 674. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. G. Hamedani, C. K. Wells, L. M. Brass, W. N. Kernan, C. M. Viscoli, J. N. Maraire, I. A. Awad, and R. I. Horwitz A Quality-of-Life Instrument for Young Hemorrhagic Stroke Patients Stroke, March 1, 2001; 32(3): 687 - 695. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. Buck, A. Jacoby, A. Massey, and G. Ford Evaluation of Measures Used to Assess Quality of Life After Stroke Stroke, August 1, 2000; 31(8): 2004 - 2010. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. W. Duncan, H. S. Jorgensen, and D. T. Wade Outcome Measures in Acute Stroke Trials : A Systematic Review and Some Recommendations to Improve Practice Stroke, June 1, 2000; 31(6): 1429 - 1438. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. L. Hackett, J. R. Duncan, C. S. Anderson, J. B. Broad, and R. Bonita Health-Related Quality of Life Among Long-Term Survivors of Stroke : Results From the Auckland Stroke Study, 1991-1992 Stroke, February 1, 2000; 31(2): 440 - 447. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. S. Williams, M. Weinberger, L. E. Harris, and J. Biller Measuring quality of life in a way that is meaningful to stroke patients Neurology, November 1, 1999; 53(8): 1839 - 1839. [Abstract] [Full Text]
|
|