(Stroke. 1999;30:1384-1389.)
© 1999 American Heart Association, Inc.
Original Contributions |
Electrical Stimulation of Wrist Extensors in Poststroke Hemiplegia
From the Department of Bioengineering, University of Strathclyde (A.D.P., M.G.), and Academic Section of Geriatric Medicine, University of Glasgow (J.P., M.C., D.J.S.), Glasgow, Scotland.
Correspondence to Prof David J Stott, Academic Section of Geriatric Medicine, 3rd Floor Centre Block, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow G4 0SF, Scotland. E-mail d.j.stott{at}clinmed.gla.ac.uk
Background and Purpose—It has been suggested that cyclic neuromuscular electrical stimulation (ES) may enhance motor recovery after stroke. We have investigated the effects of ES of the wrist extensors on impairment of wrist function and on upper-limb disability in patients being rehabilitated after acute stroke.
Methods—We recruited 60 hemiparetic patients (mean age, 68 years) 2 to 4 weeks after stroke into a randomized, controlled, parallel-group study comparing standard rehabilitation treatment with standard treatment plus ES of wrist extensors (3 times 30 minutes daily for 8 weeks). Isometric strength of wrist extensors was measured using a device built for that purpose. Upper-limb disability was assessed with use of the Action Research Arm Test (ARAT). Observations were continued for 32 weeks (24 weeks after the finish of ES or the control intervention phase).
Results—The change in isometric strength of wrist extensors (at an angle of 0° extension) was significantly greater in the ES group than the control group at both 8 and 32 weeks (P=0.004, P=0.014 by Mann Whitney U test). At week 8 the grasp and grip subscores of the ARAT increased significantly in the ES group compared with that in the control group (P=0.013 and P=0.02, respectively); a similar trend was seen for the total ARAT score (P=0.11). In the subgroup of 33 patients with some residual wrist extensor strength at study entry (moment at 0° extension >0), the ARAT total score had increased at week 8 by a mean of 21.1 (SD, 12.7) in the ES group compared with 10.3 (SD, 9.0) in the control group (P=0.024, Mann Whitney U test); however, at 32 weeks the differences between these 2 subgroups were no longer statistically significant.
Conclusions—ES of the wrist extensors enhances the recovery of isometric wrist extensor strength in hemiparetic stroke patients. Upper-limb disability was reduced after 8 weeks of ES therapy, with benefits most apparent in those with some residual motor function at the wrist. However, it is not clear how long the improvements in upper-limb disability are maintained after ES is discontinued.
Key Words: arm • electric stimulation • hand strength • randomized controlled trials • rehabilitation • stroke
This article has been cited by other articles:
 |
|
 |
|
  A. Meilink, B. Hemmen, H. Seelen, and G. Kwakkel Impact of EMG-triggered neuromuscular stimulation of the wrist and finger extensors of the paretic hand after stroke: a systematic review of the literature Clinical Rehabilitation, April 1, 2008; 22(4): 291 - 305. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 N. Yozbatiran, L. Der-Yeghiaian, and S. C. Cramer A Standardized Approach to Performing the Action Research Arm Test Neurorehabil Neural Repair, February 1, 2008; 22(1): 78 - 90. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Chae, A. Ng, D. T. Yu, A. Kirsteins, E. P. Elovic, S. R. Flanagan, R. L. Harvey, R. D. Zorowitz, and Z.-P. Fang Intramuscular Electrical Stimulation for Shoulder Pain in Hemiplegia: Does Time From Stroke Onset Predict Treatment Success? Neurorehabil Neural Repair, December 1, 2007; 21(6): 561 - 567. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. Hemmen and H.A.M. Seelen Effects of movement imagery and electromyography-triggered feedback on arm hand function in stroke patients in the subacute phase Clinical Rehabilitation, July 1, 2007; 21(7): 587 - 594. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. Alon, A. F. Levitt, and P. A. McCarthy Functional Electrical Stimulation Enhancement of Upper Extremity Functional Recovery During Stroke Rehabilitation: A Pilot Study Neurorehabil Neural Repair, May 1, 2007; 21(3): 207 - 215. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. E Sullivan and L. D Hedman Effects of home-based sensory and motor amplitude electrical stimulation on arm dysfunction in chronic stroke Clinical Rehabilitation, February 1, 2007; 21(2): 142 - 150. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. Gondin, J. Duclay, and A. Martin Soleus- and Gastrocnemii-Evoked V-Wave Responses Increase After Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation Training J Neurophysiol, June 1, 2006; 95(6): 3328 - 3335. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
N. Yozbatiran, B. Donmez, N. Kayak, and O. Bozan Electrical stimulation of wrist and fingers for sensory and functional recovery in acute hemiplegia Clinical Rehabilitation, January 1, 2006; 20(1): 4 - 11. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J.-C. Chen, C.-C. Liang, and F.-Z. Shaw Facilitation of Sensory and Motor Recovery by Thermal Intervention for the Hemiplegic Upper Limb in Acute Stroke Patients: A Single-Blind Randomized Clinical Trial Stroke, December 1, 2005; 36(12): 2665 - 2669. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. Hesse, C. Werner, M. Pohl, S. Rueckriem, J. Mehrholz, and M.L. Lingnau Computerized Arm Training Improves the Motor Control of the Severely Affected Arm After Stroke: A Single-Blinded Randomized Trial in Two Centers Stroke, September 1, 2005; 36(9): 1960 - 1966. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
U. Gabr, P. Levine, and S. J Page Home-based electromyography-triggered stimulation in chronic stroke Clinical Rehabilitation, July 1, 2005; 19(7): 737 - 745. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. E Sullivan and L. D Hedman A Home Program of Sensory and Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation With Upper-Limb Task Practice in a Patient 5 Years After a Stroke Physical Therapy, November 1, 2004; 84(11): 1045 - 1054. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R P. Van Peppen, G Kwakkel, S Wood-Dauphinee, H J. Hendriks, P. J Van der Wees, and J Dekker The impact of physical therapy on functional outcomes after stroke: what's the evidence? Clinical Rehabilitation, August 1, 2004; 18(8): 833 - 862. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. Feys, W. De Weerdt, G. Verbeke, G. C. Steck, C. Capiau, C. Kiekens, E. Dejaeger, G. Van Hoydonck, G. Vermeersch, and P. Cras Early and Repetitive Stimulation of the Arm Can Substantially Improve the Long-Term Outcome After Stroke: A 5-Year Follow-up Study of a Randomized Trial Stroke, April 1, 2004; 35(4): 924 - 929. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. Barreca, S. L. Wolf, S. Fasoli, and R. Bohannon Treatment Interventions for the Paretic Upper Limb of Stroke Survivors: A Critical Review Neurorehabil Neural Repair, December 1, 2003; 17(4): 220 - 226. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A D Pandyan, M Cameron, J Powell, D J Stott, and M H Granat Contractures in the post-stroke wrist: a pilot study of its time course of development and its association with upper limb recovery Clinical Rehabilitation, January 1, 2003; 17(1): 88 - 95. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S H Peurala, K Pitkanen, J Sivenius, and I M Tarkka Cutaneous electrical stimulation may enhance sensorimotor recovery in chronic stroke Clinical Rehabilitation, July 1, 2002; 16(7): 709 - 716. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
I-P. Hsueh and C.-L. Hsieh Responsiveness of two upper extremity function instruments for stroke inpatients receiving rehabilitation Clinical Rehabilitation, June 1, 2002; 16(6): 617 - 624. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. H van der Lee, L. D Roorda, H. Beckerman, G. J Lankhorst, and L. M Bouter Improving the Action Research Arm test: a unidimensional hierarchical scale Clinical Rehabilitation, June 1, 2002; 16(6): 646 - 653. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Hallett Recent Advances in Stroke Rehabilitation Neurorehabil Neural Repair, June 1, 2002; 16(2): 211 - 217. [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 K Walsh, P H Gompertz, and A G Rudd Stroke care: how do we measure quality? Postgrad. Med. J., June 1, 2002; 78(920): 322 - 326. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J R de Kroon, J H van der Lee, M J IJzerman, and G J Lankhorst Therapeutic electrical stimulation to improve motor control and functional abilities of the upper extremity after stroke: a systematic review Clinical Rehabilitation, April 1, 2002; 16(4): 350 - 360. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
I-P. Hsueh, M.-M. Lee, and C.-L. Hsieh The Action Research Arm Test: is it necessary for patients being tested to sit at a standardized table? Clinical Rehabilitation, April 1, 2002; 16(4): 382 - 388. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 B. T. Volpe, H. I. Krebs, N. Hogan, L. Edelstein, C. Diels, and M. Aisen A novel approach to stroke rehabilitation: Robot-aided sensorimotor stimulation Neurology, May 23, 2000; 54(10): 1938 - 1944. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. Kaelin-Lang, A. R. Luft, L. Sawaki, A. H. Burstein, Y. H. Sohn, and L. G. Cohen Modulation of human corticomotor excitability by somatosensory input J. Physiol., April 15, 2002; 540(2): 623 - 633. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|