This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by von Kummer, R. Articles by Grotta, J. C. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by von Kummer, R. Articles by Grotta, J. C.

(Stroke. 2000;31:231.)
© 2000 American Heart Association, Inc.

Letters to the Editor

"Self-Fulfilling Prophecy" or Recognition Requires a Concept of Perception

Rüdiger von Kummer, MD

Department of Neuroradiology, University of Technology, Dresden, Germany

Werner Hacke, MD

Department of Neurology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany

	Introduction

 
To the Editor:

The NINDS rt-PA Stroke Trial did not prospectively assess quantity and quality of ischemic brain parenchyma as detected by baseline CT.¹ In this trial, no CT reading panel graded CT scans on the basis of predefined definitions. Now the trialists hypothesized that there would be disagreement among them about the presence of early CT changes.² They randomly selected 70 baseline scans from the trial, and 16 of them reread the scans in a 1-day session. Among the investigators was 1 neuroradiologist who served as the "gold standard." He was able to predict the lesion location at 24 hours in 96% (95% CI 92% to 100%) of the scans based on the information provided by the baseline CT. In comparison, the 16 raters of the NINDS group were much less sensitive (78%) and specific (57%) in detecting any early CT change or in identifying changes involving >33% of the MCA territory. With this poor performance, it is not at all surprising that the agreement beyond chance among these raters was somewhat low and heterogeneous. Moreover, the authors did not design and power their study to detect an effect of the method of film viewing, the effect of image quality, or an effect of the raters’ different experiences and training on agreement. To our surprise, however, they conclude from their data that all these factors do not affect the raters’ agreement.

Can we generalize this experience? Correct interpretation of CT is a problem not only for the experienced stroke . . . [Full Text of this Article]

James C. Grotta, MD

for the NINDS rtPA Stroke Trial Study Group, University of Texas–Houston Medical School, Houston, Texas,

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A.K. Gilligan, R. Markus, S. Read, V. Srikanth, T. Hirano, G. Fitt, M. Arends, B.R. Chambers, S.M. Davis, and G.A. Donnan Baseline Blood Pressure but Not Early Computed Tomography Changes Predicts Major Hemorrhage After Streptokinase in Acute Ischemic Stroke Stroke, September 1, 2002; 33(9): 2236 - 2242. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]