Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Stroke
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Stroke. 2000;31:2517-2527

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Harwood, M.
Right arrow Articles by Biller, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Harwood, M.
Right arrow Articles by Biller, J.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
Medline Plus Health Information
*Stroke
Related Collections
Right arrow Health policy and outcome research
Right arrow Genetics of Stroke
Right arrow Rehabilitation, Stroke
Right arrow Risk Factors for Stroke

(Stroke. 2000;31:2517.)
© 2000 American Heart Association, Inc.


Letters to the Editor

Ethnicity and Equity: Missing the Point

Matire Harwood, MBChB; Harry McNaughton, FRACP, FAFRM; Kathryn McPherson, PhD Mark Weatherall, FRACP, FAFRM

Rehabilitation Teaching and Research Unit, Wellington School of Medicine, Wellington South, New Zealand

To the Editor:

We read with interest the recent editorial by Fustinoni and Biller on ethnicity and stroke.1 We feel that ethnicity is a critical aspect of understanding stroke outcomes, particularly within the Pacific rim, and are concerned by what appears a dismissive and cursory approach to the subject.

Despite the variation in definitions of "ethnicity" and "stroke," ethnicity has consistently been shown to be a significant variable for stroke. Ethnic differences in stroke incidence and stroke related mortality have been well documented in the United States, Europe, and New Zealand.2 3 4 Differences in risk factor prevalence and management,5 6 utilization of services,7 and functional and motor impairments8 have also been described to a lesser extent.

We agree with the suggestion of Fustinoni and Biller that lower socioeconomic status and associated risk factors may explain some of the stroke burden carried by ethnic minority populations. However, within each social class, premature stroke mortality still remains substantially greater for black men than white men in the United States9 and for Maori than non-Maori in New Zealand.10

Despite the increased stroke incidence rates, increased stroke severity and poor functional outcomes, mortality rates, and discharge destinations are the same for both black and white populations in Europe,3 and our recent work found that such outcomes are better for non-Europeans than Europeans in New Zealand. This challenges the fallacy that ethnic minorities are an unhealthy burden and that "whites" are the "gold standard." We propose that the family unit plays a pivotal part in this important . . . [Full Text of this Article]

O. Fustinoni, MD

Department of Neurology, University of Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina

J. Biller, MD

Department of Neurology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana