Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Stroke
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Stroke. 2000;31:2603-2609

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bosworth, H. B.
Right arrow Articles by Matchar, D. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bosworth, H. B.
Right arrow Articles by Matchar, D. B.
Related Collections
Right arrow Behavioral/psychosocial - stroke
Right arrow Behavioral Changes and Stroke
Right arrow Rehabilitation, Stroke

(Stroke. 2000;31:2603.)
© 2000 American Heart Association, Inc.


Original Contributions

Depression and Other Determinants of Values Placed on Current Health State by Stroke Patients

Evidence From the VA Acute Stroke (VASt) Study

Presented as preliminary results at the 17th Annual Health Service Research and Development Meeting, Washington, DC, February 24–26, 1999.

Hayden B. Bosworth, PhD; Ronnie D. Horner, PhD; Lloyd J. Edwards, PhD; David B. Matchar, MD, MHS for the VASt Study Team

From Health Services Research and Development (H.B.B., R.D.H., L.J.E., D.B.M.) and Epidemiologic Research and Information Center (R.D.H.), Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center, and the Center for Aging and Human Development (H.B.B., R.D.H.), the Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine (H.B.B., R.D.H., D.B.M.), the Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences (H.B.B.), the Department of Family and Community Medicine, Division of Biometry (L.J.E.), and the Center for Clinical Health Policy (D.B.M.), Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC.

Correspondence to Hayden B. Bosworth, PhD, Health Services Research and Development, Building 16, Room 70, Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center (152), 508 Fulton St, Durham NC 27705. E-mail hboswort{at}acpub.duke.edu

Background and Purpose—This prospective study examined the determinants of the utility (value) placed on health status among a sample of patients with acute ischemic and intracerebral hemorrhagic stroke.

Methods—Data were from the VA Acute Stroke (VASt) study, a nationwide prospective cohort of 1073 acute stroke patients admitted at any of 9 Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center sites between April 1, 1995, and March 31, 1997. The primary outcome was the patient’s health status utility as measured by the time-tradeoff method. Data were obtained by telephone interviews at 1, 6, and 12 months and by medical record review. General linear mixed modeling was used to assess the effects of social, psychological, and physical factors on patients’ valuations of their current health state. The analysis was confined to the 327 patients who were able to provide self-reports at >=2 time points.

Results—Patients’ valuations of their health state status over the initial 12 months after stroke were very stable over time, with only a slight improvement at 6 months, followed by a slight decline at 12 months. In adjusted analyses, living alone, being institutionalized, decreased physical function, and depression were independently associated with lower levels of patient health status utility over time.

Conclusions—Stroke patient health status utilities are relatively stable during the initial year after stroke. In addition to physical function, psychological health and social environment are important determinants of patient health status utility. These factors need to be considered when conducting stroke decision analyses if more accurate conclusions are to be drawn regarding preferred patterns of care.


Key Words: depression • physical function • quality of life • stroke outcome




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Med Decis MakingHome page
J. S. Swan, W. F. Lawrence, and J. Roy
Process Utility in Breast Biopsy
Med Decis Making, July 1, 2006; 26(4): 347 - 359.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
M. Fisher and for the Stroke Therapy Academic Industry Roundtabl
Enhancing the Development and Approval of Acute Stroke Therapies: Stroke Therapy Academic Industry Roundtable
Stroke, August 1, 2005; 36(8): 1808 - 1813.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
R. C. Carlos, D. A. Axelrod, J. H. Ellis, P. H. Abrahamse, and A. M. Fendrick
Incorporating Patient-Centered Outcomes in the Analysis of Cost-Effectiveness: Imaging Strategies for Renovascular Hypertension
Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2003; 181(6): 1653 - 1661.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
R. D. Horner, J. W. Swanson, H. B. Bosworth, and D. B. Matchar
Effects of Race and Poverty on the Process and Outcome of Inpatient Rehabilitation Services Among Stroke Patients
Stroke, April 1, 2003; 34(4): 1027 - 1031.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NeurologyHome page
P.W. Duncan, S.M. Lai, R.K. Bode, S. Perera, and J. DeRosa
Stroke Impact Scale-16: A brief assessment of physical function
Neurology, January 28, 2003; 60(2): 291 - 296.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
P. N. Post, A. M. Stiggelbout, and P. P. Wakker
The Utility of Health States After Stroke : A Systematic Review of the Literature
Stroke, June 1, 2001; 32(6): 1425 - 1429.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
T. O. Tengs, M. Yu, E. Luistro, and H. B. Bosworth
Health-Related Quality of Life After Stroke A Comprehensive Review Editorial Comment : Health-Related Quality Of Life After Stroke: A Comprehensive Review
Stroke, April 1, 2001; 32(4): 964 - 972.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]